langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Automatic addition of all Ollama models #4811

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:08:06 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:08:06 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @gakugaku on GitHub (Jul 29, 2024).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

When selecting Ollama as a model provider and adding models, it is necessary to configure each model individually. If there is only one model registered in Ollama, this is not an issue, but when there are multiple models (e.g., more than 10), it becomes a very tedious task. One of Ollama's attractions is the ability to easily manage multiple models, which makes this problem more significant.

2. Additional context or comments

Other tools integrated with Ollama have implemented this feature.

Example: OpenWebUI

When the application is started, all models present in Ollama are available for selection.
Sequence: /api/models API → backend.main.get_models → backend.main.get_all_models → ollama.main.get_all_models
Ollama API: ollama/docs/api.md List Local Models

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @gakugaku on GitHub (Jul 29, 2024). ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. When selecting Ollama as a model provider and adding models, it is necessary to configure each model individually. If there is only one model registered in Ollama, this is not an issue, but when there are multiple models (e.g., more than 10), it becomes a very tedious task. One of Ollama's attractions is the ability to easily manage multiple models, which makes this problem more significant. ### 2. Additional context or comments Other tools integrated with Ollama have implemented this feature. #### Example: [OpenWebUI](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui) When the application is started, all models present in Ollama are available for selection. Sequence: `/api/models` API → [`backend.main.get_models`](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/82079e644a291349926008adffe8fe2fc3b33566/backend/main.py#L1061) → [`backend.main.get_all_models`](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/82079e644a291349926008adffe8fe2fc3b33566/backend/main.py#L935) → [`ollama.main.get_all_models`](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/82079e644a291349926008adffe8fe2fc3b33566/backend/apps/ollama/main.py#L211) Ollama API: [ollama/docs/api.md List Local Models](https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/docs/api.md#list-local-models) ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 18:08:06 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:08:06 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:08:06 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Sakura4036 commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2024):

+1, Automatic updating of the ollama model list should be done in the settings, requiring the administrator to select which models can be used in the application, not all of them!

@Sakura4036 commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2024): +1, Automatic updating of the ollama model list should be done in the settings, requiring the **administrator** to select which models can be used in the application, not all of them!
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:08:07 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@JokerQyou commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2025):

This should be reopened.

@JokerQyou commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2025): This should be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#4811
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?