langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 20:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Can the tool's input parameters support object inputs? #5227

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @haike-1213 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

To enhance the flexibility and usability of our tools, I would like to propose a feature request:
Feature Request: Support Object Parameters for Tool Inputs
Objective: Allow the tool to accept object parameters as inputs, providing more structured and versatile data handling capabilities.
Rationale:
Enhanced Flexibility: Object parameters can encapsulate multiple values and configurations in a single input, making the tool more flexible and adaptable.
Improved Usability: Structured data formats (like JSON objects) are widely used and understood, making it easier for users to interact with the tool.
Better Data Management: Objects can provide a clear structure for input data, improving data management and reducing errors.
Implementation Details:
Object Structure Definition:
Define the required properties and their data types within the object.
Provide clear documentation on the expected object structure.
Documentation Update:
Update the tool's documentation to include details about the supported object parameters.
Include examples demonstrating how to use object parameters effectively.
Error Handling:
Implement robust error handling mechanisms to handle invalid or missing properties.
Provide clear error messages to guide users in correcting issues.
Testing:
Develop comprehensive unit tests to ensure the tool functions correctly with object parameters.
Test edge cases and error conditions to validate robustness.
Example Usage:
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"preferences": {
"language": "English",
"theme": "Dark"
}
}

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @haike-1213 on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024). ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. To enhance the flexibility and usability of our tools, I would like to propose a feature request: Feature Request: Support Object Parameters for Tool Inputs Objective: Allow the tool to accept object parameters as inputs, providing more structured and versatile data handling capabilities. Rationale: Enhanced Flexibility: Object parameters can encapsulate multiple values and configurations in a single input, making the tool more flexible and adaptable. Improved Usability: Structured data formats (like JSON objects) are widely used and understood, making it easier for users to interact with the tool. Better Data Management: Objects can provide a clear structure for input data, improving data management and reducing errors. Implementation Details: Object Structure Definition: Define the required properties and their data types within the object. Provide clear documentation on the expected object structure. Documentation Update: Update the tool's documentation to include details about the supported object parameters. Include examples demonstrating how to use object parameters effectively. Error Handling: Implement robust error handling mechanisms to handle invalid or missing properties. Provide clear error messages to guide users in correcting issues. Testing: Develop comprehensive unit tests to ensure the tool functions correctly with object parameters. Test edge cases and error conditions to validate robustness. Example Usage: { "name": "John Doe", "age": 30, "preferences": { "language": "English", "theme": "Dark" } } ### 2. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024):

There is a pr for this already https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/6845

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024): There is a pr for this already https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/6845
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@itzhoujun commented on GitHub (May 12, 2025):

Hi, the pr is closed. would you reopen this issue?

There is a pr for this already #6845

@itzhoujun commented on GitHub (May 12, 2025): Hi, the pr is closed. would you reopen this issue? > There is a pr for this already [#6845](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/6845)
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:09:58 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Seelly commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2025):

@crazywoola so，did the problem solved?

@Seelly commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2025): @crazywoola so，did the problem solved?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#5227
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?