langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

q&a adds split sources #6116

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:14:09 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:14:09 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @silence-pan84 on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @Yawen-1010 on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

Can we add the source of the current q&a in the document to the results returned by the q&a

2. Additional context or comments

The q&a is generated from those parts of the document, or paragraphs, so that Operations can easily check the accuracy of the q&a.

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @silence-pan84 on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024). Originally assigned to: @Yawen-1010 on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. Can we add the source of the current q&a in the document to the results returned by the q&a ### 2. Additional context or comments The q&a is generated from those parts of the document, or paragraphs, so that Operations can easily check the accuracy of the q&a. ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement🌚 invalid labels 2026-02-21 18:14:09 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:14:09 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:14:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details?

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details?
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:14:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@silence-pan84 commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024):

What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details?

The q&a is generated from those parts of the document, or paragraphs, so that Operations can easily check the accuracy of the q&a.

@silence-pan84 commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2024): > What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details? The q&a is generated from those parts of the document, or paragraphs, so that Operations can easily check the accuracy of the q&a.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:14:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@silence-pan84 commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2024):

Question and answer pairs are generated from those parts of the document or paragraph so that the operator can easily check the accuracy of the question and answer.

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "langgenius/dify" @.>;
发送时间: 2024年10月16日(星期三) 上午10:30
@.>;
@.@.>;
主题: Re: [langgenius/dify] q&a adds split sources (Issue #9390)

What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

@silence-pan84 commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2024): Question and answer pairs are generated from those parts of the document or paragraph so that the operator can easily check the accuracy of the question and answer. ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "langgenius/dify" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2024年10月16日(星期三) 上午10:30 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [langgenius/dify] q&a adds split sources (Issue #9390) What kind of source do you want to add? Can you provide more details? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:14:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2024):

Hi, @silence-pan84. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary

  • You requested a feature for the Q&A system to include document sections used for generating Q&A to verify accuracy.
  • @crazywoola asked for more details about the type of source information needed.
  • You clarified the need for operators to easily check accuracy by identifying document sections.
  • You mentioned you are not interested in contributing to the development of this feature.

Next Steps

  • Please let us know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting on this issue.
  • If there is no further input, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2024): Hi, @silence-pan84. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary** - You requested a feature for the Q&A system to include document sections used for generating Q&A to verify accuracy. - @crazywoola asked for more details about the type of source information needed. - You clarified the need for operators to easily check accuracy by identifying document sections. - You mentioned you are not interested in contributing to the development of this feature. **Next Steps** - Please let us know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting on this issue. - If there is no further input, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 🌚 invalid 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#6116
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?