langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 20:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

support qwen long input format：system role input twice #7277

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:19:47 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:19:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @lyl3321 on GitHub (Dec 18, 2024).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

I want to use the qwen long model for a lot of text processing, but I find that using qwenlong on dify doesn't allow me to enter a lot of text because the input format is different from the qwenlong interface call specification

2. Additional context or comments

image
Qwenlong's interface specification requires two input system roles, the first system input is the role definition, and the second input system is the full text of the document

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @lyl3321 on GitHub (Dec 18, 2024). ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. I want to use the qwen long model for a lot of text processing, but I find that using qwenlong on dify doesn't allow me to enter a lot of text because the input format is different from the qwenlong interface call specification ### 2. Additional context or comments ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d48189e-987a-4834-8363-51621a4bfe30) Qwenlong's interface specification requires two input system roles, the **first** system input is the **role definition**, and the **second** input system is the **full text of the document** ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:19:47 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:19:47 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025):

Hi, @lyl3321. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary

  • You reported an incompatibility issue with the qwen long model on Dify.
  • The problem involves the input format not aligning with the qwenlong interface call specification.
  • This issue affects processing large text volumes due to the need for two system role inputs.
  • No further comments or developments have been made on this issue.

Next Steps

  • Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of the Dify repository? If so, feel free to comment to keep the discussion open.
  • If there are no updates, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2025): Hi, @lyl3321. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary** - You reported an incompatibility issue with the qwen long model on Dify. - The problem involves the input format not aligning with the qwenlong interface call specification. - This issue affects processing large text volumes due to the need for two system role inputs. - No further comments or developments have been made on this issue. **Next Steps** - Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of the Dify repository? If so, feel free to comment to keep the discussion open. - If there are no updates, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#7277
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?