langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-22 12:36:14 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Request to Add API Base Configuration for Google Gemini Model Provider #7891

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:22:55 -05:00 by yindo · 7 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:55 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @lbersl on GitHub (Jan 25, 2025).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Provide a description of requested docs changes

Hello, I noticed that when setting up "Model Providers," OpenAI has an "API Base" configuration option, but when setting up Google Gemini, there is only an API key setting and no "API Base" configuration option.

  1. Could you add an "API Base" configuration option for Google Gemini?
  2. Alternatively, could you point me to which source code file I need to modify to implement a custom API Base?

Thank you!

Image

Originally created by @lbersl on GitHub (Jan 25, 2025). ### Self Checks - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [x] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### Provide a description of requested docs changes Hello, I noticed that when setting up "Model Providers," OpenAI has an "API Base" configuration option, but when setting up Google Gemini, there is only an API key setting and no "API Base" configuration option. 1. Could you add an "API Base" configuration option for Google Gemini? 2. Alternatively, could you point me to which source code file I need to modify to implement a custom API Base? Thank you! ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aad24de9-1e63-4096-b5b9-72b93e96bce9)
yindo added the 💪 enhancementstale labels 2026-02-21 18:22:55 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:22:55 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jiandanfeng commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2025):

Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk

@jiandanfeng commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2025): Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@G-TTYg commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2025):

I'm experiencing the same need. A custom API base option for Gemini would enable me to direct requests through a reverse proxy. This is crucial in my setup to work around specific limitations.

Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk

@G-TTYg commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2025): I'm experiencing the same need. A custom API base option for Gemini would enable me to direct requests through a reverse proxy. This is crucial in my setup to work around specific limitations. > Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Cp0204 commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025):

Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk

China has a firewall that prevents direct access to Google

@Cp0204 commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2025): > Why do you need this? Gemini's API base is packaged in sdk China has a firewall that prevents direct access to Google
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@appwcn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2025):

Yes, I also need it badly.
appreciated

@appwcn commented on GitHub (Feb 22, 2025): Yes, I also need it badly. appreciated
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Tina-patentpro commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2025):

yes，this would be a good solution

@Tina-patentpro commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2025): yes，this would be a good solution
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Cp0204 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2025):

I found a temporary solution: adding environment variable proxy in the dify-api service:

http_proxy: http://172.17.0.1:10808
https_proxy: http://172.17.0.1:10808
no_proxy: 127.0.0.1,api,worker,web,db,redis,sandbox,plugin_daemon,ssrf_proxy,nginx,weaviate

Note: Use lowercase.

References:

@Cp0204 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2025): I found a temporary solution: adding environment variable proxy in the `dify-api` service: ```yaml http_proxy: http://172.17.0.1:10808 https_proxy: http://172.17.0.1:10808 no_proxy: 127.0.0.1,api,worker,web,db,redis,sandbox,plugin_daemon,ssrf_proxy,nginx,weaviate ``` Note: Use lowercase. References: - https://blog.csdn.net/zhyhang/article/details/146140019 - https://www.5ee.net/archives/SvwO2F0M - https://linux.do/t/topic/314470/4
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:22:56 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2025):

Hi, @lbersl. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested an "API Base" configuration option for the Google Gemini model provider, similar to OpenAI's.
  • @jiandanfeng questioned the necessity, noting the API base is in the SDK.
  • @G-TTYg and @Cp0204 highlighted the need for a custom API base to bypass restrictions like China's firewall.
  • @Cp0204 provided a temporary workaround using environment variables for a proxy setup.

Next Steps:

  • Please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting here.
  • If there is no further activity, the issue will be automatically closed in 15 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 12, 2025): Hi, @lbersl. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You requested an "API Base" configuration option for the Google Gemini model provider, similar to OpenAI's. - @jiandanfeng questioned the necessity, noting the API base is in the SDK. - @G-TTYg and @Cp0204 highlighted the need for a custom API base to bypass restrictions like China's firewall. - @Cp0204 provided a temporary workaround using environment variables for a proxy setup. **Next Steps:** - Please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting here. - If there is no further activity, the issue will be automatically closed in 15 days. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label stale 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#7891
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?