langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

chatglm-turbo support 3.2k token #809

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00 by yindo · 8 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @hunter-eric on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @crazywoola on GitHub.

Self Checks

Dify version

0.3.32

Cloud or Self Hosted

Self Hosted (Docker)

Steps to reproduce

image

✔️ Expected Behavior

image

❌ Actual Behavior

image we can not change max token of chatglm-turbo
Originally created by @hunter-eric on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023). Originally assigned to: @crazywoola on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to file this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). ### Dify version 0.3.32 ### Cloud or Self Hosted Self Hosted (Docker) ### Steps to reproduce <img width="556" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/1303119/89560ee3-ef0e-4e1d-9b11-2d793fd92b8e"> ### ✔️ Expected Behavior <img width="556" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/1303119/54bf1899-947b-4fc6-b2f8-9bbd5b864481"> ### ❌ Actual Behavior <img width="385" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/1303119/dccd5f4f-2b10-4ce8-b0e5-37871f9b1d1c"> we can not change max token of chatglm-turbo
yindo added the 🐞 bug label 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

We will take a look into this issue. :)

---- Update----
The model did not provide a setting called max_token, so it shouldn't be able to display anyway. We will remove this setting later.

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): We will take a look into this issue. :) ---- Update---- The model did not provide a setting called `max_token`, so it shouldn't be able to display anyway. We will remove this setting later.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@hunter-eric commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

We will take a look into this issue. :)

---- Update---- The model did not provide a setting called max_token, so it shouldn't be able to display anyway. We will remove this setting later.

so we have to wait the version of 0.3.4?
now the request log show that dify did not submit the content to llm model when context larger than 512token.

@hunter-eric commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): > We will take a look into this issue. :) > > ---- Update---- The model did not provide a setting called `max_token`, so it shouldn't be able to display anyway. We will remove this setting later. so we have to wait the version of 0.3.4? now the request log show that dify did not submit the content to llm model when context larger than 512token.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

Yes, until we fix this.

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): Yes, until we fix this.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

I have a question about the version, we are currently using v0.3.33, And you said you are using 0.3.2? Do you mean 0.3.32?

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): I have a question about the version, we are currently using v0.3.33, And you said you are using 0.3.2? Do you mean 0.3.32?
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@hunter-eric commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

I have a question about the version, we are currently using v0.3.33, And you said you are using 0.3.2? Do you mean 0.3.32?

yes ,i mean 0.3.32. Thanks

@hunter-eric commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): > I have a question about the version, we are currently using v0.3.33, And you said you are using 0.3.2? Do you mean 0.3.32? yes ,i mean 0.3.32. Thanks
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023):

This is a frontend bug, it won't affect what it will send to the llm. Because we do not have max token for chatglm_turbo. So it's a placeholder(default) value.
First image shows the 512 tokens, but actually it costs more than this one.
image

image
@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2023): This is a frontend bug, it won't affect what it will send to the llm. Because we do not have max token for chatglm_turbo. So it's a placeholder(default) value. First image shows the 512 tokens, but actually it costs more than this one. <img width="421" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/100913391/bfe070ed-fdf9-47b2-9a1f-270b89c6d120"> <img width="453" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/100913391/58d0032c-36c7-448c-bc58-525e45227ea8">
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@WSDzju commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2023):

This is a frontend bug, it won't affect what it will send to the llm. Because we do not have max token for chatglm_turbo. So it's a placeholder(default) value. First image shows the 512 tokens, but actually it costs more than this one. image

image

I also found the problem. In the case of gpt-3.5-turbo, the Max Token can be costomized. So the Max Token option will be added for Chatglm? I also try the lastest version 0.3.34, the option have not provided yet. BTW, the ouput length of chatglm-turbo is relatively short, although I have provided considerable context docs and prompted to give the answer as long as possible. So the situation is only related to LLM itself ?

@WSDzju commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2023): > This is a frontend bug, it won't affect what it will send to the llm. Because we do not have max token for chatglm_turbo. So it's a placeholder(default) value. First image shows the 512 tokens, but actually it costs more than this one. <img alt="image" width="421" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/100913391/290530422-bfe070ed-fdf9-47b2-9a1f-270b89c6d120.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTEiLCJleHAiOjE3MDMwNTYyODgsIm5iZiI6MTcwMzA1NTk4OCwicGF0aCI6Ii8xMDA5MTMzOTEvMjkwNTMwNDIyLWJmZTA3MGVkLWZkZjktNDdiMi05YTFmLTI3MGI4OWM2ZDEyMC5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBSVdOSllBWDRDU1ZFSDUzQSUyRjIwMjMxMjIwJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDIzMTIyMFQwNzA2MjhaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT1iNzkyZjNjNjc4MmM2ZDBlYjNhODI5Mjc4ZjFjYzFlMTRiNmQ3MmUzZjhlMzhjYmMzMjlmMzIzZjgyMDg2NWUyJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.cyplFR5pBf7Iina9aWO6WxYKJoFW5g3B9sW5-k_XafI"> > > <img alt="image" width="453" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/100913391/290530369-58d0032c-36c7-448c-bc58-525e45227ea8.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTEiLCJleHAiOjE3MDMwNTYyODgsIm5iZiI6MTcwMzA1NTk4OCwicGF0aCI6Ii8xMDA5MTMzOTEvMjkwNTMwMzY5LTU4ZDAwMzJjLTM2YzctNDQ4Yy1iYzU4LTUyNWU0NTIyN2VhOC5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBSVdOSllBWDRDU1ZFSDUzQSUyRjIwMjMxMjIwJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDIzMTIyMFQwNzA2MjhaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT1hZWE5YTdiZmIyOTJmY2RjZTcyMTJkMDRiOTg2YWQ1OTA3ZWI3ZGNhMWVhODgwYzg4ZjNmMmMxMzU2MThiYmFjJlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCZhY3Rvcl9pZD0wJmtleV9pZD0wJnJlcG9faWQ9MCJ9.alBJSq3GkSLYTS0_cFT0DzRYTcoJEOkNwAiExg3sLys"> I also found the problem. In the case of gpt-3.5-turbo, the Max Token can be costomized. So the Max Token option will be added for Chatglm? I also try the lastest version 0.3.34, the option have not provided yet. BTW, the ouput length of chatglm-turbo is relatively short, although I have provided considerable context docs and prompted to give the answer as long as possible. So the situation is only related to LLM itself ?
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:28:33 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2024):

We have update the UI, and there is no max_token in ChatGLM. This should be resolved in v0.4.x

image
@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2024): We have update the UI, and there is no max_token in ChatGLM. This should be resolved in v0.4.x <img width="656" alt="image" src="https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/100913391/6d1b76a3-fb96-42f0-9f72-b1ae86b9ed05">
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 🐞 bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#809
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?