langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-08-27 21:10:04 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Use LlamaIndex to splitter pdf and excels #8469

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:25:50 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:25:50 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @Zwxxxxxxx on GitHub (Feb 20, 2025).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

When uploading PDFs and Excel files to the knowledge base, the chunking process does not work well, resulting in poor recall performance. Why not use LlamaIndex to process PDFs and Excel files, making the knowledge base more efficient and user-friendly?

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @Zwxxxxxxx on GitHub (Feb 20, 2025). ### Self Checks - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [x] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. When uploading PDFs and Excel files to the knowledge base, the chunking process does not work well, resulting in poor recall performance. Why not use LlamaIndex to process PDFs and Excel files, making the knowledge base more efficient and user-friendly? ### 2. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [x] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 18:25:50 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:25:50 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:25:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@laipz8200 commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025):

It's an interesting thought! I think allowing users to choose the splitter they want to use is better.

@laipz8200 commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025): It's an interesting thought! I think allowing users to choose the splitter they want to use is better.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:25:51 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025):

Hi, @Zwxxxxxxx. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You are experiencing issues with the chunking process during PDF and Excel file uploads, impacting recall performance.
  • You proposed using LlamaIndex to improve file processing and expressed interest in contributing to this feature.
  • Another user, Laipz8200, suggested allowing users to select their preferred splitter, which you reacted to positively.

Next Steps:

  • Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository? If so, feel free to comment to keep the discussion open.
  • If there are no further updates, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025): Hi, @Zwxxxxxxx. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You are experiencing issues with the chunking process during PDF and Excel file uploads, impacting recall performance. - You proposed using LlamaIndex to improve file processing and expressed interest in contributing to this feature. - Another user, Laipz8200, suggested allowing users to select their preferred splitter, which you reacted to positively. **Next Steps:** - Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository? If so, feel free to comment to keep the discussion open. - If there are no further updates, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#8469
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?