mirror of
https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel.git
synced 2026-10-12 11:19:56 +00:00
e110472edd3597eb863822d85535bb173deee06a
712
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
da8ca43064 |
Python: fix (openai): only propagate usage metadata for final streaming chunk without choices (#12977)
### Motivation and Context
1. Why is this change required?
- The previous condition copied usage metadata whenever chunk.usage
existed, which could incorrectly propagate usage into chunks that
already contained choices.
2. What problem does it solve?
- Prevents incorrect propagation of usage metadata that can cause empty
messages or duplicated metadata when a streaming chunk contains choices
plus usage.
3. What scenario does it contribute to?
- Streaming OpenAI chat responses where the API may send a final
usage-only chunk (no choices) to report usage stats.
4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
- No linked issue.
### Description
- File modified:
-
python/semantic_kernel/connectors/ai/open_ai/services/open_ai_chat_completion_base.py
- Change summary:
- In
OpenAIChatCompletionBase._inner_get_streaming_chat_message_contents,
replace:
if chunk.usage is not None
with:
if len(chunk.choices) == 0 and chunk.usage is not None
- Design notes:
- This is a minimal, targeted fix to ensure usage metadata is only
copied when the streaming chunk contains no choices (typical for the
final usage-only chunk).
- Behavior of other streaming logic is unchanged.
- Recommend adding unit tests covering:
- A chunk that contains choices and usage (should not propagate usage).
- A usage-only final chunk (should propagate usage to the synthesized
choice).
### Contribution Checklist
- [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [x] The PR follows the SK Contribution Guidelines and formatting
script raises no violations
- [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [x] I didn't break anyone 😄
Files changed:
-
python/semantic_kernel/connectors/ai/open_ai/services/open_ai_chat_completion_base.py
---------
Co-authored-by: chentiantian <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]>
|
||
|
|
4e9ea78390 |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.36.1 for a release (#13049)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.36.1 for a release <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.36.1 for a release <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
f7fdfcd9a9 |
Python: Add AzureAIAgent Deep Research Tool support (#13034)
### Motivation and Context The deep research tool was introduced for the AzureAIAgent; however, we didn't have support yet in SK. Adding support now for using the deep research tool for both streaming and non-streaming. Samples added as well. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Add support for deep research tool. - Add samples with notes on prerequisites to configure the sample to run properly. - Added support for `AZURE_AI_AGENT_DEEP_RESEARCH_MODEL` env var within `AzureAIAgentSettings` class. - Bumped min allowed `azure-ai-agents` package ver to 1.2.0b3. - Closes #12978 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
86b10b95d2 |
Python: provide AzureAIAgent thread msg id during streaming (#13032)
### Motivation and Context As part of invoking an AzureAIAgent via streaming, we weren't providing the `thread_id` via the `AgentStreamEvent.THREAD_MESSAGE_CREATED` event. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Supply the caller with the `thread_msg_id` by sticking it into the returned SCMC's `metadata` dictionary. - Closes #12959 Sample output looks like: ``` Sample Output: # User: 'Hello' # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT: (thread message id: msg_HZ2h4Wzbj7GEcnVCjnyEuYWT) Hello! How can I assist you with the menu today? # User: 'What is the special soup?' # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT: (thread message id: msg_TSjkJK6hHJojIkPvF6uUofHD) The special soup today is Clam Chowder. Would you like to know more about it or anything else from the menu? # User: 'How much does that cost?' # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT: (thread message id: msg_liwTpBFrB9JpCM1oM9EXKiwq) The Clam Chowder costs $9.99. Is there anything else you'd like to know? # User: 'Thank you' # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT: (thread message id: msg_K6lpR3gYIHethXq17T6gJcxi) You're welcome! If you have any more questions or need assistance, feel free to ask. Enjoy your meal! ``` <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
5e50e190c4 |
Python: Add reasoning support for OpenAI Responses Agents (GPT-5, o4-mini, o3) (#12881)
## Summary Adds reasoning capabilities to Python OpenAI ResponsesAgent, bringing parity with the C# implementation. This enables fine-grained control over reasoning effort for O-series models (o1, o3-mini, o4-mini) and gpt-5 that support the reasoning parameter. Fixes #12843 ## Changes ### Core Implementation - **`openai_responses_agent.py`**: Added reasoning configuration support - Constructor-level reasoning effort setting - Per-invocation reasoning effort override capability - Proper parameter validation and model compatibility checks - **`responses_agent_thread_actions.py`**: Extended thread actions to support reasoning parameters - Reasoning effort propagation through thread operations - Metadata preservation for reasoning tokens and summaries ### Sample and Tests - **`responses_agent_reasoning.py`**: Comprehensive demonstration sample - Constructor vs per-invocation reasoning configuration - Function calling integration with reasoning - Reasoning comparison scenarios (low/medium/high effort) - Error handling and troubleshooting guidance - **`test_openai_responses_agent_reasoning.py`**: Full unit test coverage - Parameter validation tests - Integration scenarios with function calling - Edge cases and error conditions ## Features ✅ **Constructor-Level Reasoning**: Set default reasoning effort when creating agents ✅ **Per-Invocation Override**: Override reasoning effort per request ✅ **Priority Hierarchy**: per-invocation > constructor > model default ✅ **Function Calling Compatible**: Works seamlessly with existing plugin system ✅ **Azure OpenAI & OpenAI Support**: Compatible with both service providers ✅ **Model Validation**: Automatic compatibility checks for O-series models nad GÜT-5 ✅ **Metadata Access**: Reasoning tokens and summaries available in response metadata ## Usage Example ```python # Constructor-level reasoning # Constructor-level reasoning configuration agent = AzureResponsesAgent( ai_model_id="gpt-5", client=client, reasoning={"effort": "low"} # Default reasoning for all requests ) # Per-invocation override response = await agent.invoke( "Solve this complex problem step by step", reasoning={"effort": "high"} ) # Invoke with reasoning callback to capture intermediate thoughts response = await agent.invoke( "Analyze this data step by step", reasoning={"effort": "high", "summary": "detailed"}, on_intermediate_message=handle_reasoning_message ) # Streaming with reasoning async for response in agent.invoke_stream( "Explain quantum computing in detail", reasoning={"effort": "high", "summary": "detailed"}, on_intermediate_message=handle_reasoning_message ): print(response.content, end="", flush=True) --------- Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
d3318adfc2 |
Python: Add container_id and filename fields to AnnotationContent class (#12985)
### Motivation and Context
I confirmed that Code Interpreter can run via Azure Responses API in
Semantic Kernel, but I found two issues: an error occurs when a file is
created inside the Code Interpreter, and the response lacks parameters
required to access the created file.
### Description
#### Bug 1: ValidationError for AnnotationContent
Semantic Kernel uses the following enum for
`AnnotationContent.content_type`:
```python
@experimental
class CitationType(str, Enum):
"""Citation type."""
URL_CITATION = "url_citation"
FILE_PATH = "file_path"
FILE_CITATION = "file_citation"
```
However, the Responses API returns file citations with a `type` like
this:
```json
{"container_id": "cntr_68a6c50135d88190b6fdc062051155b50847ddec73d3be1b", "end_index": 94, "file_id": "cfile_68a6c67a7fcc8190889d7e1789d485e2", "filename": "sample.txt", "start_index": 66, "type": "container_file_citation"}
```
There is no matching enum member on the Semantic Kernel side. The
`CitationType` should include `CONTAINER_FILE_CITATION`, for example:
```python
@experimental
class CitationType(str, Enum):
"""Citation type."""
URL_CITATION = "url_citation"
FILE_PATH = "file_path"
FILE_CITATION = "file_citation"
CONTAINER_FILE_CITATION = "container_file_citation"
```
#### Bug 2: Missing parameters to access generated files
The response returned by the agent shows a `file_id`, but lacks the
`container_id` and `filename` required to download the file (the
filename is needed to replace `sandbox:/mnt/data/sample.txt`):
Example call:
```python
r = await agent.get_response(cast(list, history.messages), thread=thread)
print(r.content.items)
```
Example output:
```python
[
TextContent(inner_content=None, ai_model_id=None, metadata={}, content_type='text', text='<user_prompt>', encoding=None),
TextContent(inner_content=None, ai_model_id=None, metadata={}, content_type='text', text='<assistant_message>\n\n[sample.txt](sandbox:/mnt/data/sample.txt)', encoding=None),
AnnotationContent(inner_content=None, ai_model_id=None, metadata={}, content_type='annotation', file_id='cfile_68a6c67a7fcc8190889d7e1789d485e2', quote=None, start_index=88, end_index=116, url=None, title=None, citation_type=<CitationType.CONTAINER_FILE_CITATION: 'container_file_citation'>)
]
```
To include these values in the parsed result, `AnnotationContent` in
`semantic_kernel/contents/annotation_content.py` should expose
`container_id` and `filename`, and map the incoming `type` to
`citation_type`. Example suggested structure:
```python
@experimental
class AnnotationContent(KernelContent):
"""Annotation content."""
content_type: Literal[ContentTypes.ANNOTATION_CONTENT] = Field(ANNOTATION_CONTENT_TAG, init=False) # type: ignore
tag: ClassVar[str] = ANNOTATION_CONTENT_TAG
file_id: str | None = None
quote: str | None = None
start_index: int | None = None
end_index: int | None = None
url: str | None = None
title: str | None = None
# added
container_id: str | None = None
filename: str | None = None
citation_type: CitationType | None = Field(None, alias="type")
model_config = ConfigDict(
extra="ignore",
populate_by_name=True,
)
def __str__(self) -> str:
...
def to_element(self) -> Element:
...
@classmethod
def from_element(cls: type[_T], element: Element) -> _T:
...
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
...
```
Summary: add the missing enum value `container_file_citation` and extend
`AnnotationContent` to include `container_id` and `filename` (and map
`type` to `citation_type`) so file references returned by the Azure
Responses API are fully usable.
#### Code
```python
client: AsyncAzureOpenAI = AsyncAzureOpenAI(
base_url=urljoin(server_settings.AZURE_OPENAI_COMPLETION_ENDPOINT.rstrip("/") + "/", "openai/v1/"),
api_key=server_settings.AZURE_OPENAI_COMPLETION_API_KEY,
api_version="preview",
)
async def run(history: ChatHistory) -> dict[str, Any]:
with open("sample.txt", "rb") as fp:
f = await client.files.create(file=fp, purpose="assistants")
agent = AzureResponsesAgent(
ai_model_id=server_settings.AZURE_OPENAI_COMPLETION_DEPLOYMENT_NAME,
client=client,
name="name",
function_choice_behavior=FunctionChoiceBehavior.Required(),
tools=[
CodeInterpreter(
type="code_interpreter",
container=CodeInterpreterContainerCodeInterpreterToolAuto(type="auto", file_ids=[f.id]),
)
],
)
thread = ResponsesAgentThread(client, history, previous_response_id=None, enable_store=True)
r = await agent.get_response(cast(list, history.messages), thread=thread)
print(thread.id, r.content.items)
annotation_content = [item for item in r.content.items if isinstance(item, AnnotationContent)]
for ac in annotation_content:
print(ac.file_id, ac.filename, ac.container_id)
```
### Contribution Checklist
<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->
- [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [x] I didn't break anyone 😄
Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]>
|
||
|
|
1179122a5e |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.36.0 for a release. (#13014)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.36.0 for a release. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.36.0 for a release. <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
18d9a8e8b2 |
Python: .Net: Updated encoding logic in prompt templates (#12983)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Resolves: https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/issues/11821 Today, the encoding of template arguments is performed only if argument type is `string`. In case of custom type, anonymous type or collection - the encoding is not performed. This PR contains changes to throw an exception in case if encoding is enabled but complex type is used. In case of complex type, the encoding should be performed manually according to business logic and automatic encoding should be explicitly disabled. This enforces stricter, but more secure template rendering rules. **Note**: this is a breaking change for customers who use Handlebars or Liquid template with complex type arguments. Code changes are required when initializing template arguments: ```diff var arguments = new KernelArguments() { { "customer", new { - firstName = userInput.FirstName, - lastName = userInput.LastName, + firstName = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(userInput.FirstName), + lastName = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(userInput.LastName), } } }; var templateFactory = new LiquidPromptTemplateFactory(); var promptTemplateConfig = new PromptTemplateConfig() { TemplateFormat = "liquid" + InputVariables = new() + { + // We set AllowDangerouslySetContent to 'true' because each property of this argument is encoded manually. + new() { Name = "customer", AllowDangerouslySetContent = true }, + } }; var promptTemplate = templateFactory.Create(promptTemplateConfig); var renderedPrompt = await promptTemplate.RenderAsync(kernel, arguments); ``` ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
2a47ba9b7d |
Python: Removed usage of DefaultAzureCredential (#12964)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> The usage of `DefaultAzureCredential` by default is unsafe and raises security issues. Instead, users should provide their own credential types such as `AzureCliCredential`, `ManagedIdentityCredential` and so on. More information here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/python/api/azure-identity/azure.identity.aio?view=azure-python In this PR: 1. Removed the usage of `DefaultAzureCredential` from authentication logic. 2. Replaced `DefaultAzureCredential` with `AzureCliCredential` in all examples. **Note**: this is breaking change for Azure users, who relies on `DefaultAzureCredential`. Users will need to update the code and pass the credential type of their choice by using `credential` parameter when initializing one of the Azure clients. Before: ```python chat_completion = AzureChatCompletion() ``` After: ```python chat_completion = AzureChatCompletion(credential=AzureCliCredential()) ``` ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
45fe60545c |
Python: Fix issue with orphaned tool/tool_calls (#12923)
### Motivation and Context Tool/tool_calls are getting orphaned. Issue : https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/issues/12708 How to reproduce : ```python from semantic_kernel.contents import ( AuthorRole, ChatMessageContent, FunctionCallContent, FunctionResultContent, ChatHistoryTruncationReducer, ) messages = [ ChatMessageContent(role=AuthorRole.SYSTEM, content="sys"), ChatMessageContent(role=AuthorRole.USER, content="user A"), ChatMessageContent( role=AuthorRole.ASSISTANT, items=[ FunctionCallContent( id="123", function_name="search", plugin_name="plugin", arguments={"q": "x"} ) ], ), ChatMessageContent( role=AuthorRole.TOOL, items=[ FunctionResultContent( id="123", function_name="search", plugin_name="plugin", result="RESULT" ) ], ), ChatMessageContent(role=AuthorRole.USER, content="user B"), ChatMessageContent(role=AuthorRole.ASSISTANT, content="done"), ] reducer = ChatHistoryTruncationReducer(target_count=3, threshold_count=0) reducer.messages = messages print("Before reduce:", [m.role for m in reducer.messages]) await reducer.reduce() print("After reduce:", [m.role for m in reducer.messages]) # After reduce: [<AuthorRole.TOOL: 'tool'>, <AuthorRole.USER: 'user'>, <AuthorRole.ASSISTANT: 'assistant'>] ``` ### Description Move backward as long as we are in a tool/tool_call island when reducing the messages. --------- Co-authored-by: Allaoua Benchikh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
09fb007bb1 |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.35.3 for a release (#12945)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.35.3 for a release <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.35.3 for a release <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
6416c58b90 |
Python: Add arguments and results attributes to execute tool span (#12940)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> We are adding two new attributes to the execute tool span according to this proposal to Otel Semantic Conventions: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/pull/2528 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> The following two attributes are added to the `execute_tool` span: 1. `gen_ai.tool.call.arguments` 2. `gen_ai.tool.call.result` ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
40734345dc |
Python: Fix the Responses agent msg chaining with reasoning models (#12907)
### Motivation and Context When running a reasoning model with the OpenAI responses agent, it was producing 400s due to the way we were either including or not including FCC related to tool calls. This PR fixes it for both the default (store_enabled=True) and the case where uses don't want to use OpenAI's previous response id as a pseudo-thread (store_enabled=False). <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Closes #12843 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
d4e0278330 |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.35.2 for a release (#12894)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.35.2 for a release <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.35.2 for a release <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
73ad6e8923 |
Python: Fix: Implement __deepcopy__ on KernelFunction to handle non-serializable OTEL metrics (#12803)
### Description This PR fixes TypeError: cannot pickle '_thread.RLock' object which occurs when kernel.clone() is called while OpenTelemetry metrics are enabled. - Fixes: #12802 ### Motivation and Context When using features like `HandoffOrchestration`, the agent's `Kernel` is cloned. This process uses `copy.deepcopy`, which fails on the `KernelFunction`'s OpenTelemetry `Histogram` fields (`invocation_duration_histogram` and `streaming_duration_histogram`). These histogram objects contain thread locks, making them non-serializable. Previous solutions, like the one in **PR #9292**, used `Field(exclude=True, default_factory=...)`. While that was a necessary step, it was insufficient because `deepcopy` does not respect the `exclude` flag in the same way that Pydantic's serialization does. This bug blocks the use of certain agentic features in any application that has metrics-based observability enabled. ### Description of the change This solution introduces a custom __deepcopy__ method to the KernelFunction Pydantic model. This method correctly handles the deep-copying process for KernelFunction instances: 1. It intercepts the deepcopy call for KernelFunction objects. 2. It uses self.model_copy(deep=False) to create a new instance of the Pydantic model. Using deep=False allows the default_factory for the histogram fields to create new, clean instances on the copied object, while other fields are shallow-copied. 3. It then manually deep-copies all other attributes from the original object to the new one, ensuring that any other mutable objects (like metadata`) are correctly duplicated. The histogram fields are explicitly skipped in this step, as they have already been recreated by `model_copy. 4. Standard deepcopy memoization is used to prevent infinite recursion in the case of cyclic object graphs. This approach ensures that the non-serializable fields are re-initialized instead of copied, resolving the TypeError while maintaining the integrity of the cloned object. ### How has this been tested? The fix was validated using the reproduction steps outlined in the associated issue. Running an agent orchestration that triggers kernel.clone() with OpenTelemetry metrics enabled now completes successfully without any errors. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
a6b5f34d9b |
Python: fix parsing of types in mcp server (#12871)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> The parsing of tool call output was not working correctly, this fixes that. Solves #12850 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
91392a77e0 |
Python: Fix ResponsesAgent image duplication in chat history preparation (#12859)
### Motivation and Context The ResponsesAgent is duplicating messages in chat history preparation when messages contained multiple content items (text + images). The `response_inputs.append()` call is inside the content processing loop, causing each message to be added once per content item. The fix: - Moved `response_inputs.append()` outside the content processing loop - Added unit test to verify multiple images don't get duplicated <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Fixed loop placement in `_prepare_chat_history_for_request` - Added test `test_prepare_chat_history_multiple_images_no_duplication` - Fixes #12848 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
58c3c4d27f |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.35.1 for a release. (#12856)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.35.1 for a release. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.35.1 for a release. <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
8336c320d9 |
Python: Add bedrock model provider parameter (#12853)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Fixes #12833 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Add an optional setting to the Bedrock AI connectors to allow users to specify the Bedrock model providers (i.e. amazon, anthropic, etc) so that they can use application inference profiles. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Dmytro Struk <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
1198b573d1 |
Python: Add ability to specify encoding when adding a plugin. Add tests. (#12797)
### Motivation and Context Right now when adding a plugin, we don't allow one to specify the type of encoding used. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Allow configuration for the type of encoding used. - Adds unit tests - Closes #12440 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
e5972e2430 |
Python: Add incomplete details reason to AzureAIAgent error message (#12796)
### Motivation and Context When errors occur processing a run of an AzureAIAgent, we surface the error message but not the incomplete_details reason if it exists. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description This PR adds handling for the incomplete details reason, if it exists, so it can be passed back via the error message. - Closes #12752 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
b7bb2832aa |
Python: Input & output attributes in invoke_agent span (#12834)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> The OTel workgroup has been thinking about enhancing tracing for agents. This is a proposal from our tracing team: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/pull/2528. This PR implements part of the proposal so that when the proposal gets merged, we can quickly follow. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Two new attributes are added to the `invoke_agent` span, namely the `gen_ai.agent.invocation_input` and `gen_ai.agent.invocation_output`. <img width="747" height="583" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8b81f68-915b-48ee-8f86-66a0d4f686cc" /> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Evan Mattson <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
358b0f343b |
Python: .Net: Magentic orchestration to return the last agent message when limits reached (#12839)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Related to #12687 Related to #12656 Currently, the Magentic orchestration returns a static message if the max reset limit or the max invocation limit is reached. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Return the last agent response if either of the limit is reached. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 --------- Co-authored-by: Chris <[email protected]> |
||
|
|
1efc7ad04e |
Python: Pass through arguments when creating agents from specs (#12771)
### Motivation and Context Currently, attempting to pass through KernelArguments through agent creation via declarative spec isn't working properly. The arguments are used to normalize fields, but are then not passed through fully to where the agent is created. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Pass arguments through, and merge them properly with the normalized fields. This allows for underlying args to be used by the agent, like in the case of structured outputs. - Closes #12770 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
5332c2e330 |
Python: Require tool_call_id parameter for string-based tool messages in ChatHistory (#12753)
### Motivation and Context The `add_tool_message` method of `ChatHistory` accepts string content without requiring a `tool_call_id` parameter. This design is flawed from an API design perspective. It created tool messages that: 1. Violated chat completion protocols: most LLM APIs (OpenAI, etc.) require tool messages to have a `tool_call_id` that references a previous function call 2. Broke conversation flow: tool messages should always be responses to specific tool calls, maintaining the call-response relationship 3. Created malformed message sequences: messages without proper tool call IDs would fail when sent to language models <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description This PR modifies the `add_tool_message` string overload to require a `tool_call_id` parameter, which makes sure we have proper tool call protocol compliance. 1. The string overload now validates that `tool_call_id` is provided and raises a clear error if missing 2. Tool messages now create `FunctionResultContent` objects with both `id` and `call_id` set to the provided `tool_call_id` 3. Added support for an optional `function_name` parameter for better bookkeeping 4. Provides informative error messages explaining why `tool_call_id` is required - Closes #12744 Before: ```python # This would create an invalid tool message without tool_call_id # when the `.to_dict()` method is called on `ChatMessageContent` chat_history.add_tool_message("Function result") # Creates broken message and losing pairing to the corresponding `FunctionCallContent`. ``` After: ```python # Now requires tool_call_id for proper protocol compliance chat_history.add_tool_message("Function result") # raises clear error due to missing `tool_call_id` chat_history.add_tool_message("Function result", tool_call_id="call_123") # works correctly # Optional function name for better bookkeeping chat_history.add_tool_message("Function result", tool_call_id="call_123", function_name="get_weather") # works as well ``` <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
d4f6703cf3 |
Python: fix Bing grounding & custom search content generation (#12760)
### Motivation and Context The same `agent_content_generation` method is used to handle both `bing_grounding` and `bing_custom_search` tool calls; however, the method expected that the dicts on the underlying types were named the same - which they aren't. They have their respective names, as shown above. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Fix Bing content generation based on the instance we're dealing with. - Add unit tests. - Closes #12746 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
b723fbd5e1 |
Python: Add mix agent orchestration sample (#12749)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> We don't have a sample showing how to use a mix of agents of various types in an orchestration. This PR adds one. A bug is also discovered in the OpenAIResponsesAgent while creating the sample. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> 1. Add a new sample showing how to use a mix of agents in the Handoff orchestration. 2. Fix a bug in the OpenAIResponsesAgent where the tools were not considering the tools in the kernel instance. A new test is added too. 3. Fix a bug in the AgentActorBase where the intermediate message callback was rejecting ChatMeesageContent type. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
c79f5a5c63 |
Python: improved MCP connect and additional samples (#12696)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Adding a sample using StreamableHTTPServer towards Github. Added a demo showing how to connect to a OAuth protected MCP server. Also some improvements in the connect logic for MCP. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
48f71b1f2e |
Python: Support AzureAI agent MCP tools for streaming and non-streaming invocations (#12736)
### Motivation and Context MCP tool support was released for the AzureAI Agent and it has yet to be added to the SK Python AzureAIAgent. This PR adds functionality to handle the MCP tools for both streaming and non-streaming invocations. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Adds MCP support for the Python AzureAI Agent. - Upgrades dependent packages to be able to use the mcp tool from the Azure SDK. <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
190954a2c9 |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.35.0 for a release (#12725)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.35.0 for a release <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.35.0 for a release <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
b74ea05540 |
Python: Improve orchestration exception handling (#12716)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Currently, exceptions that occur inside the orchestration actors are not properly surfaced to the caller as it happens. Fixes: https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/issues/12719 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> This PR addresses the issue by introducing a new exception_callback that is hidden from the user but will raise exceptions that occurs inside the orchestration actors to the caller. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
ba031e689d |
Python: Properly handle AzureAI Search results for AzureAIAgent (#12654)
### Motivation and Context After the Azure AI Agent service went to GA, there were some updates in the underlying SDK. When there are azure_ai_search results while running the agent, they no longer show up as attributes related to the tool call. They are present in the dictionary, so our current code is failing when trying to access the attribute. This PR updates how we form the FunctionCallContent or FunctionResultContent for both azure_ai_search streaming and non-streaming. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Update how we form the FunctionCallContent or FunctionResultContent for both azure_ai_search streaming and non-streaming for the AzureAIAgent. - Closes #12422 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
93a14d5115 |
Python: feature: support gpt-image-1 (#12621)
This pull request was created in response to the issue https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/issues/12500#issuecomment-2998387488. The current AzureTextToImage implementation only works with DALL-E 3. For gpt-image-1, the response format has changed from a URL to base64 only, which the current code does not support. Additionally, gpt-image-1 introduces a new image editing feature that also needs to be supported. Since breaking changes are required, new methods have been added. Minimal code that reproduces the problem ```python service = AzureTextToImage( service_id=service_id, deployment_name="image-1", endpoint=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_ENDPOINT, api_key=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_API_KEY, ) ) settings = service.get_prompt_execution_settings_class()(service_id="image1") settings.prompt = "sky" settings.size = ImageSize(width=1024, height=1024) settings.quality = "low" r = await service.generate_image(settings=settings) ``` Example of use with newly added methods ```python from semantic_kernel.connectors.ai.open_ai import AzureTextToImage service = AzureTextToImage( service_id="image1", deployment_name="gpt-image-1", endpoint=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_ENDPOINT, api_key=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_API_KEY, api_version="2025-04-01-preview", ) settings = service.get_prompt_execution_settings_class()(service_id="image1") settings.n = 3 images_b64 = await service.generate_images("A cute cat wearing a whimsical striped hat", settings=settings) ``` ```python from semantic_kernel.connectors.ai.open_ai import AzureTextToImage service = AzureTextToImage( service_id="image1", deployment_name="gpt-image-1", endpoint=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_ENDPOINT, api_key=AZURE_OPENAI_IMAGE_API_KEY, api_version="2025-04-01-preview", ) file_paths = ["./new_images/img_1.png", "./new_images/img_2.png"] settings = service.get_prompt_execution_settings_class()(service_id="image1") settings.n = 2 results = await service.edit_image( prompt="Make the cat wear a wizard hat", image_paths=file_paths, settings=settings, ) ``` ## Problems Identified 1. Assumption of URL-based responses. The current implementation assumes a response format that includes an image url, which is not the case for gpt-image-1. See: https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/8d1b3fd55155bb65e9671383366d2672c4582fb0/python/semantic_kernel/connectors/ai/open_ai/services/open_ai_text_to_image_base.py#L69 |
||
|
|
c15c885f84 |
Python: Emit partial result for magentic pattern when retrieving final result, if available (#12656)
### Motivation and Context When using the magentic orchestration pattern, if the `max_round_count` is hit, the final result shows as: ``` Final result: Max round count reached. ``` The interim messages do show as part of the `agent_response_callback`; however, not everyone may have that configured. We should return more meaningful results, even if partial. This PR updates to try and get a partial result if it exists. When one calls: ```python value = await orchestration_result.get() ``` for the `step5_magentic.py` sample, with `max_round_count=1` they should receive the partial result: ``` Final result: Based on the available data, here is a comparison of the estimated training and inference energy consumption for ResNet-50, BERT-base, and GPT-2, along with the associated CO₂ emissions when training on an Azure Standard_NC6s_v3 VM for 24 hours. **Model Architectures and Datasets:** - **ResNet-50**: Image classification model trained on ImageNet. - **BERT-base**: Text classification model fine-tuned on the GLUE benchmark. - **GPT-2**: Text generation model trained on WebText. ... <rest omitted for brevity> ... ``` <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Return partial results for magentic orchestration if they exist. - Closes #12625 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
ba000c3368 |
Python: Use message cache in agent orchestrations (#12618)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Some agent threads don't support adding messages. An example of this is the copilot studio agent. In an agent orchestration, an agent may receive multiple messages before it is asked to generate a response. The currently approach in the orchestrations would add new messages to an agent thread whenever an agent receives a message, making the copilot studio agent not compatible with some orchestrations. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Instead of adding messages to the agent thread, this PR introduces a message cache to store messages temporarily before the agent is invoked. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
ef392d22ee |
Python: Bump version to 1.34.0 for a release (#12580)
### Motivation and Context Bump version to 1.34.0 for a release. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump version to 1.34.0 for a release. <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
16d708e161 |
Python: added operationid validation in openapi spec (#12551)
Description This PR enforces the presence of an explicit `operationId` for every operation in the OpenAPI specification. Previously, if `operationId` was missing, a default value was generated using the path and HTTP method. Now, the parser will raise a PluginInitializationError if operationId is not provided, ensuring that all operations are uniquely and explicitly identified as required by the OpenAPI standard. Key changes: - Added validation to check for the existence of operationId in each operation. - If operationId is missing, a clear error is raised, preventing fallback to a default value. - [python/tests/unit/connectors/openapi_plugin/no-operationid-openapi.yaml](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/compare/main...sshandilya1991:semantic-kernel:sshandilya/12443_add_operation_id_validation?expand=1#diff-3d272039b3afa97f89805f0ee0258a98b613f0f373c603467b336a8912d5651a) serves as a test case. - Closes #12443 Edit: - Added more validation for operationId to be unique & throw in case duplicate operationId found while parsing. |
||
|
|
2bfa31b754 |
Python: pseudo-stream copilot invoke_stream (#12548)
### Motivation and Context The current copilot studio client doesn't support streaming invocation. The underlying orchestration patterns rely on agents to have an invoke_stream. Since it doesn't exist in the copilot agent, that agent type cannot be used. This PR implements a pseudo-invoke_stream so that the agent can be used with patterns - although it doesn't stream the response back in chunks, it unblocks the use if one desired to use our new orchestration patterns. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Closes #12449 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
9e3cdffc6b |
Python: Improve AzureAIAgent get thread msg handling. (#12535)
### Motivation and Context Currently, when fetching thread messages for an AzureAIAgent, it assumes that the agent exists, so we can pull it down and get its id. This may not always be the case - an agent could have been deleted, but the thread still exists. We need to account for this. When creating user messages that we add to the thread, there's no `name` or `id` parameter allowed. We can, however, add metadata to the message. Going forward we are adding the `agent_id` as metadata to the message, so upon retrieval later, we can attempt to get it and return the id with the user's message. This allows one to see which agent_id has responded to the user's message: ``` # Messages in the thread (asc order): # AuthorRole.USER for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: Hello # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: Hello! How can I assist you with the menu today? # AuthorRole.USER for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: What is the special soup? # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: The special soup today is Clam Chowder. Would you like to know more about it or anything else on the menu? # AuthorRole.USER for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: How much does that cost? # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: The Clam Chowder costs $9.99. Would you like to order it or need information on other items? # AuthorRole.USER for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: Thank you # AuthorRole.ASSISTANT for name=asst_mXwZOwyJLxXGtaYKHizRH6Ip: You're welcome! If you have any more questions or need assistance with the menu, feel free to ask. Enjoy your meal! ``` <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Closes #12435 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
003cc4c010 |
Python: Feature python vector stores preb (#12271)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Overhaul of the VectorStores to get it matching with dotnet and the latest development there. Closes: - #11938 - #11598 - #11597 - #11517 - #10561 - #10391 - #9911 - #9892 - #10867 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> Many changes, some highlights: - Moved from different vector fields types, to a single with a enum first VectorStoreField() - Renamed several items - Made embeddinggenerrator a part of the vector field spec and do automatic vectorization from there or from the same param on a collection - Adds hybrid search using the same setup - Removed the intermediate TextSeachVectorSearch object need, by allowing `create_search_function` directly on a collection Will write out full changes in a migration guide in the docs. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
466a610727 |
Python: Allow for structured outputs with Ollama (#12533)
### Motivation and Context Ollama's execution settings currently only allow for `json` literal. We also want to support structured outputs for models that support it. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Closes #12355 - Supersedes #12386 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
cef5ae7402 |
Python: Support | and |= operators for KernelArgument (#12499)
### Motivation and Context `KernelArguments` extends the built-in `dict` by adding an `execution_settings` attribute. However, when using the `|` and `|=` operators, only the `dict` part (excluding `execution_settings`) is merged, and the result becomes a plain `dict`. This causes the `execution_settings` attribute to be lost and not updated. ### Description - Implemented support for the `|` and `|=` operators to make it easier for users to merge `KernelArgument` objects. - The right-hand or left-hand side of the operator can be either a `KernelArgument` or a `dict` (or any subclass of dict). - When merging, both the `execution_settings` attribute and the rest of the `dict` data are merged individually, and the result is returned as a `KernelArgument`. - As long as either side of the operator is a `KernelArgument`, the result will also be a `KernelArgument`. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
44f1253460 |
Python: Agent response callbacks to provide full context (#12501)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Currently, the agent response callbacks in the `Orchestrations` are triggered only when the final responses from the agents become available. This limits developers to create solutions that can expose the internal processing of the agents in multi agent orchestrations. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> The callbacks will now be triggered by the intermediate messages of the agents: 1. A new sample 2. Tests P.s. Fix a bug where the name of the intermediate messages is not assigned. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
8d1b3fd551 |
Python: fixes for new MCP types and small openapi fix (#12486)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Fixes to include AudioContent for MCP Small typing improvement in OpenAPI. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
dfbc993d8f |
Python: Remove orchestration persona adaptation messages (#12446)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> We previously found that agents might get carried away from in long contexts. The persona adaptation messages were designed to steer the agents in an orchestration to respond more closely to the instructions provided (as system message). As we perform more testing with newer models, we believe that the persona adaptation messages are no longer necessary. The additional instability (because they are hardcoded messages that devs can't override) and cost (the additional token cost which is not significant, but they do pollute the context which makes debugging difficult) they introduce is not worth the benefit they provide. Closing #12294 > Ideally, we'd want to approach this more analytically. The lack of a multi-agent evaluation process makes it difficult. All samples were verified to make sure they behave the same before and after the removal of the persona adaptation messages. ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> 1. Remove the persona adaptation messages. 2. Unit tests. 3. Replace `OpenAIChatCompletion` with `AzureChatCompletion` in some of the samples. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
029732dc36 |
Python: Bump Python version to 1.33.0 for release (#12427)
### Motivation and Context Bump Python version to 1.33.0 for release <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description Bump Python version to 1.33.0 for release <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
4b23389f71 |
Python: Emit token usage with streaming chat completion agent. (#12416)
### Motivation and Context
The chat completion agent was not emitting token using during streaming
invocation because we were only allowing through `response.items`. In
the case of token usage, `response.items` is [] and the usage is
contained as part of the message's `metadata` dict. This PR fixes that
bug and allows for `response.items or response.metadata.get("usage")`.
Two new samples are added to the concepts/agents/chat_completion dir to
show how one can track token use for streaming and non-streaming agent
invocation. Token usage handling is also added to the chat completion
agent integration tests.
<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
1. Why is this change required?
2. What problem does it solve?
3. What scenario does it contribute to?
4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->
### Description
- Fixes a bug where we weren't emitting the streaming token usage for
the chat completion agent. Also now includes the `prompt_tokens_details`
and `completion_tokens_details` models that are returned, but not
previously handled.
- Adds new samples
- Updates integration tests to track token usage and make sure they're
non-zero.
- Closes #12411
<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->
### Contribution Checklist
<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->
- [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [X] I didn't break anyone 😄
|
||
|
|
c3c8dfabc6 |
Python: Bing custom search tool content support (#12415)
### Motivation and Context In the `azure-ai-agent` package version 1.1.0b1, they provided the `AgentsNamedToolChoiceType.BING_CUSTOM_SEARCH` enum. Adding this to then provide support for generating bing grounding content for streaming/non-streaming path. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Add BING_CUSTOM_SEARCH enum to allow for content support. - Bumps `pyproject.toml` `azure-ai-agents` min allowed version to `1.1.0b1` which includes this new enum. <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [X] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
3e31c3bdc6 |
Python: Remove planner-related code and samples. (#12417)
### Motivation and Context Per deprecation method, removing planner-related code after June 1, 2025. <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> ### Description - Removing planner-related code. - Closes #12400 <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [ ] I didn't break anyone 😄 |
||
|
|
a7eab4ac6d |
Python: Remove model info check in Bedrock connectors (#12395)
### Motivation and Context <!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo! Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following information: 1. Why is this change required? 2. What problem does it solve? 3. What scenario does it contribute to? 4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> Closing #10941 ### Description <!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design. These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! --> To support more ways (via `model_id`, `inference_profile`, or `model arn`) to send requests to Bedrock models, we have removed the checks on whether a model supports certain features, i.e. streaming and embedding generation. This is because to check for if a model support certain features, we need the model id, but given the flexibility in specifying the target model, it's no longer possible to retrieve the model information realiably. ### Contribution Checklist <!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: --> - [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings - [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [pre-submission formatting script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts) raises no violations - [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible - [x] I didn't break anyone 😄 |