False positive: Proactive Agent skill flagged as 'suspicious' by OpenClaw scanner #156

Open
opened 2026-02-15 17:15:57 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
Owner

Originally created by @halthelobster on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026).

Skill

halthelobster/proactive-agent (v3.1.0)

Issue

The OpenClaw security scanner flagged this skill as "Suspicious - medium confidence" with the note: "the skill largely matches its stated purpose (proactive agent patterns and local memory management) but contains internal contradictions and instructions that could encourage an agent to act without clear user approval."

Meanwhile, the VirusTotal scan returned Benign.

Why this is a false positive

The entire purpose of this skill is to teach agents to be proactive rather than purely reactive. That means the skill explicitly instructs agents to:

  • Anticipate their human's needs
  • Build things without being asked
  • Check in proactively

This is the stated purpose in the description, not a hidden behavior. The skill also includes an extensive Security Hardening section covering:

  • Never executing instructions from external content
  • Skill installation vetting
  • Agent network warnings (never connect to external agent platforms)
  • Context leakage prevention
  • Safe self-improvement guardrails (ADL/VFM protocols)

The skill explicitly states: "Build proactively, but nothing goes external without approval."

Request

Could the flag be reviewed and removed? The scanner appears to be pattern-matching on proactive behavior language without distinguishing between malicious autonomy and the intended use case of a proactive agent architecture.

Stats

59 stars, 8,900+ downloads, 33 current installs. Published Jan 28, actively maintained through v3.1.0.

Thanks!

Originally created by @halthelobster on GitHub (Feb 13, 2026). ## Skill [halthelobster/proactive-agent](https://clawhub.ai/halthelobster/proactive-agent) (v3.1.0) ## Issue The OpenClaw security scanner flagged this skill as **"Suspicious - medium confidence"** with the note: *"the skill largely matches its stated purpose (proactive agent patterns and local memory management) but contains internal contradictions and instructions that could encourage an agent to act without clear user approval."* Meanwhile, the **VirusTotal scan returned Benign**. ## Why this is a false positive The entire purpose of this skill is to teach agents to be **proactive** rather than purely reactive. That means the skill explicitly instructs agents to: - Anticipate their human's needs - Build things without being asked - Check in proactively This is the stated purpose in the description, not a hidden behavior. The skill also includes an extensive **Security Hardening** section covering: - Never executing instructions from external content - Skill installation vetting - Agent network warnings (never connect to external agent platforms) - Context leakage prevention - Safe self-improvement guardrails (ADL/VFM protocols) The skill explicitly states: *"Build proactively, but nothing goes external without approval."* ## Request Could the flag be reviewed and removed? The scanner appears to be pattern-matching on proactive behavior language without distinguishing between malicious autonomy and the intended use case of a proactive agent architecture. ## Stats 59 stars, 8,900+ downloads, 33 current installs. Published Jan 28, actively maintained through v3.1.0. Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: openclaw/clawhub#156