mirror of
https://gitee.com/openharmony/kernel_linux
synced 2025-02-23 13:12:26 +00:00
cpufreq: tegra: update comment for clarity
Tegra's driver got updated a bit (00917dd cpufreq: Tegra: implement intermediate frequency callbacks) and implements new 'intermediate freq' infrastructure of core. Above commit updated comments about when to call clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk) and Doug wasn't satisfied with those comments and said this: > The "Though when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to > take this reference." makes me think that this function is actually > called when target-freq is intermediate freq. I don't think it is, > right? For better clarity just make that comment more explicit about when we call tegra_target_intermediate(). Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reported-and-reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
830bcac4e4
commit
40cc549013
@ -71,9 +71,12 @@ static int tegra_target_intermediate(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Take an extra reference to the main pll so it doesn't turn
|
||||
* off when we move the cpu off of it as enabling it again while we
|
||||
* switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time. Though
|
||||
* when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to take this
|
||||
* reference.
|
||||
* switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When target-freq is equal to intermediate freq we don't need to
|
||||
* switch to an intermediate freq and so this routine isn't called.
|
||||
* Also, we wouldn't be using pll_x anymore and must not take extra
|
||||
* reference to it, as it can be disabled now to save some power.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user