Fix problems with backtraces in two ui tests.
`default-backtrace-ice.rs` started started failing for me recently,
because on my Ubuntu 23.04 system there are 100 stack frames, and the
current stack filtering pattern doesn't match on a stack frame with a
three digit number.
`issue-86800.rs` can also be improved, backtrace-wise.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
This test is supposed to ensure that full backtraces are used for ICEs.
But it doesn't actually do that -- the filtering done cannot distinguish
between a full backtrace versus a short backtrace.
So this commit changes the filtering to preserve the existence of
`__rust_{begin,end}_short_backtrace` markers, which only appear in full
backtraces. This change means the test now tests what it is supposed to
test.
Also, the existing filtering included a rule that excluded any line
starting with two spaces. This was too strong because it filtered out
some parts of the error message. (This was not a showstopper). It was
also not strong enough because it didn't work with three digit stack
frame numbers, which just started seeing after upgrading my Ubuntu
distro to 23.04 machine (this *was* a showstopper).
So the commit replaces that rule with two more precise rules, one for
lines with stack frame numbers, and one for "at ..." lines.
Because it then just has to be filtered out.
This change makes this test more like these other tests:
- tests/ui/treat-err-as-bug/err.rs
- tests/ui/treat-err-as-bug/delay_span_bug.rs
- tests/ui/mir/validate/storage-live.rs
- tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/bugs/ice-substitution.rs
- tests/ui/layout/valid_range_oob.rs
check array type of repeat exprs is wf
Fixes#111091
Also makes sure that we actually renumber regions in the length of repeat exprs which we previously weren't doing and would cause ICEs in `adt_const_params` + `generic_const_exprs` from attempting to prove the wf goals when the length was an unevaluated constant with `'erased` in the `ty` field of `Const`
The duplicate errors are caused by the fact that `const_arg_to_const`/`array_len_to_const` in `FnCtxt` adds a `WellFormed` goal for the created `Const` which is also checked by the added `WellFormed(array_ty)`. I don't want to change this to just emit a `T: Sized` goal for the element type since that would ignore `ConstArgHasType` wf requirements and generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying to sync up `wf::obligations` for arrays and the code in hir typeck for repeat exprs.
r? `@compiler-errors`
correctly recurse when expanding anon consts
recursing with `super_fold_with` is wrong in case `bac` is itself normalizable, the test that was supposed to test for this being wrong did not actually test for this in reality because of the usage of `{ (N) }` instead of `{{ N }}`. The former resulting in a simple `ConstKind::Param` instead of `ConstKind::Unevaluated`. Tbh generally this test seems very brittle and it will be a lot easier to test once we have normalization of assoc consts since then we can just test that `T::ASSOC` normalizes to some `U::OTHER` which normalizes to some third thing.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Encode def span for foreign return-position `impl Trait` in trait
Fixes#111031, yet another def-span encoding issue :/
Includes a smaller repro than the issue, but I can confirm it ICEs:
```
query stack during panic:
#0 [def_span] looking up span for `rpitit::Foo::bar::{opaque#0}`
#1 [object_safety_violations] determining object safety of trait `rpitit::Foo`
#2 [check_is_object_safe] checking if trait `rpitit::Foo` is object safe
#3 [typeck] type-checking `main`
#4 [used_trait_imports] finding used_trait_imports `main`
#5 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
```
Luckily since this only affects nightly, this desn't need to be backported.
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes#110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
Add cross-language LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler by adding the `-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang `-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Thank you again, ``@bjorn3,`` ``@nikic,`` ``@samitolvanen,`` and the Rust community for all the help!
Implement tuple<->array convertions via `From`
This PR adds the following impls that convert between homogeneous tuples and arrays of the corresponding lengths:
```rust
impl<T> From<[T; 1]> for (T,) { ... }
impl<T> From<[T; 2]> for (T, T) { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<[T; 12]> for (T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T) { ... }
impl<T> From<(T,)> for [T; 1] { ... }
impl<T> From<(T, T)> for [T; 2] { ... }
/* ... */
impl<T> From<(T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T, T)> for [T; 12] { ... }
```
IMO these are quite uncontroversial but note that they are, just like any other trait impls, insta-stable.
This commit adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
support to the Rust compiler by adding the
`-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang
`-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more
information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the
Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and
-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e.,
non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Don't bail out early when checking invalid `repr` attr
Fixes#111051
An invalid repr delays a bug. If there are other invalid attributes on the item, we emit a warning and exit without re-checking the repr here, so no error is emitted and the delayed bug ICEs
Implement negative bounds for internal testing purposes
Implements partial support the `!` negative polarity on trait bounds. This is incomplete, but should allow us to at least be able to play with the feature.
Not even gonna consider them as a public-facing feature, but I'm implementing them because would've been nice to have in UI tests, for example in #110671.
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
Mark`feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)` and`feature(async_fn_in_trait)` as not incomplete
I think they've graduated, since as far as I'm aware, they don't cause compiler crashes or unsoundness anymore.
Fix elaboration with associated type bounds
When computing a trait's supertrait predicates, do not add any associated type *trait* bounds to that list of supertrait predicates. This is because supertrait predicates are expected to have the same `Self` type as the trait.
For example, given:
```rust
trait Foo: Bar<Assoc: Send>
```
Before, we would compute that the supertrait predicates of `T: Foo` are `T: Bar` and `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send`. However, the last bound is a trait predicate for a totally different type than `T`, and existing code that uses supertrait bounds such as vtable construction, closure fn signature deduction, etc. all rely on the invariant that we have a list of predicates for self type `T`.
Fixes#76593
The reason for all the extra diagnostic noise is that we're recomputing predicates with a different filter now. These diagnostics should be deduplicated for any end-user though.
---
This does bring up an interesting question -- is the predicate `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send` an implied bound of `T: Foo`? Because currently the only bounds implied by a (non-alias) trait are its supertraits. I guess I could fix this too, but it would require even more changes, and I'm inclined to punt this question along.
Stabilize debugger_visualizer
This stabilizes the `debugger_visualizer` attribute (#95939).
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` feature as `accepted`.
* Marks the `debugger_visualizer` attribute as `ungated`.
* Deletes feature gate test, removes feature gate from other tests.
Closes#95939
Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
Don't validate constants in const propagation
Validation is neither necessary nor desirable.
The constant validation is already omitted at mir-opt-level >= 3, so there there are not changes in MIR test output (the propagation of invalid constants is covered by an existing test in tests/mir-opt/const_prop/invalid_constant.rs).
Chris Denton
