Fix `dropping_copy_types` lint from linting in match-arm with side-effects
This PR fixes an issue with the `dropping_copy_types` and `dropping_references` lints when not all patterns that can have side-effects were detected and ignored.
Nearly _fixes_ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112653 (will need beta-backport to completely fix the issue)
r? ``@Nilstrieb``
Implement most of MCP510
This implements most of what remains to be done for MCP510:
- turns `-C link-self-contained` into a `+`/`-` list of components, like `-C link-self-contained=+linker,+crto,+libc,+unwind,+sanitizers,+mingw`. The scaffolding is present for all these expected components to be implemented and stabilized in the future on their own time. This PR only handles the `-Zgcc-ld=lld` subset of these link-self-contained components as `-Clink-self-contained=+linker`
- handles `-C link-self-contained=y|n` as-is today, for compatibility with `rustc_codegen_ssa::back::link::self_contained`'s [explicit opt-in and opt-out](https://github.com/lqd/rust/blob/fa23495deaabcfeb7f6b3afad32af8853e20c91f/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs#L1671-L1676).
- therefore supports our plan to opt out of `rust-lld` (when it's enabled by default) even for current `-Clink-self-contained` users, with e.g. `-Clink-self-contained -Clink-self-contained=-linker`
- turns `add_gcc_ld_path` into its expected final form, by using the `-C link-self-contained=+linker` CLI flag, and whether the `LinkerFlavor` has the expected `Cc::Yes` and `Lld::Yes` shape (this is not yet the case in practice for any CLI linker flavor)
- makes the [new clean linker flavors](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96827#issuecomment-1208441595) selectable in the CLI in addition to the legacy ones, in order to opt-in to using `cc` and `lld` to emulate `-Zgcc-ld=lld`
- ensure the new `-C link-self-contained` components, and `-C linker-flavor`s are unstable, and require `-Z unstable-options` to be used
The up-to-date set of flags for the future stable CLI version of `-Zgcc-ld=lld` is currently: `-Clink-self-contained=+linker -Clinker-flavor=gnu-lld-cc -Zunstable-options`.
It's possible we'll also need to do something for distros that don't ship `rust-lld`, but maybe there are already no tool search paths to be added to `cc` in this situation anyways.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113168 (fix(resolve): skip assertion judgment when NonModule is dummy)
- #113174 (Better messages for next on a iterator inside for loops)
- #113182 (Error when RPITITs' hidden types capture more lifetimes than their trait definitions)
- #113196 (Fix associated items effective visibility calculation for type privacy lints)
- #113226 (Fix try builds on the msvc builder)
- #113227 (Update cargo)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Error when RPITITs' hidden types capture more lifetimes than their trait definitions
This implements a stricter set of captures rules for RPITITs. They now may only capture:
1. Lifetimes from the impl header (both the self type and any trait substs -- we may want to restrict just to the self type's lifetimes, but the PR makes that easy to do, too)
2. Lifetimes mentioned by the `impl Trait` in the trait method's definition.
Namely, they may not mention lifetimes from the method (early or late) that are not mentioned in the `impl Trait`.
cc #105258 which I think was trying to do this too, though I'm not super familiar with what exactly differs from that or why that one was broken.
cc #112194 (doesn't fix this issue per se, because it's still an open question, but I think this is objectively better than the status quo, and gets us closer to resolving that issue.)
Technically is a fix for the ICE in #108580, but it turns that issue into an error now. We can decide separately whether or not nested RPITITs should capture lifetimes from their parents.
r? ``@oli-obk``
fix(resolve): skip assertion judgment when NonModule is dummy
Fixes#85992
## Why #85992 panic
During `resolve_imports`, the `path_res` of the import `issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is pointing to `external::issue_85992_extern_2` instead of `crate::issue_85992_extern_2`. As a result `import.imported_module.set` had been executed.
Attached 1: the state of `early_resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` during the `resolve_imports` for `use issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is as follows:
|iter in `visit_scopes` | `scope` | `result.binding` |
| - | - | - |
| init | - | - |
| 0 | `CrateRoot` | Err(Determined) |
| 1 | `ExternPrelude` | pointing to the `issue_85992_extern_2`(external) |
However, during finalization for `issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome`, the `innermost_result` was pointed to `crate::issue_85992_extern_2` and no ambiguity was generated, leading to a panic.
Attached 2: the state of `early_resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` during the `finalize_import` for `use issue_85992_extern_2::Outcome` is as follows:
|iter in `visit_scopes` | `scope` | `result.binding` | `innermost_result` |
| - | - | - | - |
| init | - | - | `None` |
| 0 | `CrateRoot` | pointing to `use crate::issue_85992_extern_2` **(introdcued by dummy)** | same as `result` but with a `Some` wapper|
| 1 | `ExternPrelude` | pointing to the `issue_85992_extern_2`(external) | smae as above |
## Try to solve
Skip assertion judgment when `NonModule` is dummy
r? `@petrochenkov`
loongarch: Fix ELF header flags
This patch changes the ELF header flags so that the ABI matches the floating-point features. It also updates the link to the new official documentation.
No need to distinguish `LocalTy` from `Ty`
I think the distinction between `decl_ty` and `revealed_ty` was from when you were allowed to put `impl Trait` in let bindings... I don't think we need that anymore, and it makes typeck that much more confusing 😆
Side-note: I don't know why we store this in a separate field [`locals`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_typeck/struct.Inherited.html#structfield.locals) in `Inherited`, rather than just the `TypeckResults`... Might look into changing that next.
linker flavors
- only the stable values for `-Clink-self-contained` can be used on stable until we
have more feedback on the interface
- `-Zunstable-options` is required to use unstable linker flavors
Fix unset e_flags in ELF files generated for AVR targets
Closes#106576
~~Sort-of blocked by gimli-rs/object#500~~ (merged)
I'm not sure whether the list of AVR CPU names is okay here. Maybe it could be moved out-of-line to improve the readability of the function.
Use structured suggestion when telling user about `for<'a>`
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Encode item bounds for `DefKind::ImplTraitPlaceholder`
This was lost in a refactoring -- `hir::ItemKind::OpaqueTy` doesn't always map to `DefKind::Opaque`, specifically for RPITITs, so the check was migrated subtly wrong, and unfortunately I never had a test for this 🙃Fixes#113155
r? ``@cjgillot``
Account for late-bound vars from parent arg-position impl trait
We should be reporting an error like we do for late-bound args coming from a parent APIT.
Fixes#113016
suggest `slice::swap` for `mem::swap(&mut x[0], &mut x[1])` borrowck error
Recently saw someone ask why this code (example slightly modified):
```rs
fn main() {
let mut foo = [1, 2];
std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
}
```
triggers this error and how to fix it:
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo[_]` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/main.rs:4:33
|
4 | std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
| -------------- ----------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
| | |
| | first mutable borrow occurs here
| first borrow later used by call
|
= help: consider using `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
The current help message is nice and goes in the right direction, but I think we can do better for this specific instance and suggest `slice::swap`, which makes this compile
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Normalize opaques with late-bound vars again
We have a hack in the compiler where if an opaque has escaping late-bound vars, we skip revealing it even though we *could* reveal it from a technical perspective. First of all, this is weird, since we really should be revealing all opaques in `Reveal::All` mode. Second of all, it causes subtle bugs (linked below).
I attempted to fix this in #100980, which was unfortunately reverted due to perf regressions on codebases that used really deeply nested futures in some interesting ways. The worst of which was #103423, which caused the project to hang on build. Another one was #104842, which was just a slow-down, but not a hang. I took some time afterwards to investigate how to rework `normalize_erasing_regions` to take advantage of better caching, but that effort kinda fizzled out (#104133).
However, recently, I was made aware of more bugs whose root cause is not revealing opaques during codegen. That made me want to fix this again -- in the process, interestingly, I took the the minimized example from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103423#issuecomment-1292947043, and it doesn't seem to hang any more...
Thinking about this harder, there have been some changes to the way we lower and typecheck async futures that may have reduced the pathologically large number of outlives obligations (see description of #103423) that we were encountering when normalizing opaques with bound vars the last time around:
* #104321 (lower `async { .. }` directly as a generator that implements `Future`, removing the `from_generator` shim)
* #104833 (removing an `identity_future` fn that was wrapping desugared future generators)
... so given that I can see:
* No significant regression on rust perf bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1600070317)
* No timeouts in crater run I did (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605428952, rechecked failing crates in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605973434)
... and given that this PR:
* Fixes#104601
* Fixes#107557
* Fixes#109464
* Allows us to remove a `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` from codegen (21530af858)
I'm inclined to give this another shot at landing this. Best case, it just works -- worst case, we get more examples to study how we need to improve the compiler to make this work.
r? types
Matthias Krüger