Fix codegen test suite for bare-metal-like targets
For Ferrocene I needed to run the test suite for custom target with no unwinding and static relocation. Running the tests uncovered ~20 failures due to the test suite not accounting for these options. This PR fixes them by:
* Fixing `CHECK`s to account for functions having extra LLVM IR attributes (in this case `nounwind`).
* Fixing `CHECK`s to account for the `dso_local` LLVM IR modifier, which is [added to every item when relocation is static](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2d62f71710b39960039820136a0be19ac4003d45/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/mono_item.rs#L139-L142).
* Fixing `CHECK`s to account for missing `uwtables` attributes.
* Added the `needs-unwind` attributes for tests that are designed to check unwinding.
There is no part of Rust CI that checks this unfortunately, and testing whether the PR works locally is kinda hard because you need a target with std enabled but no unwinding and static relocations. Still, this works in my local testing, and if future PRs accidentally break this Ferrocene will take care of sending followup PRs.
Fix duplicate `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` calls when using the uninit `Arc` constructors
What this fixes is the duplicate calls to `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` seen here: https://godbolt.org/z/jr5Gxozhj
The issue was discovered alongside #111603 but is otherwise unrelated to the duplicate `alloca`s, which remain unsolved. Everything I tried to solve said main issue has failed.
As for the duplicate layout calculations, I also tried slapping `#[inline]` and `#[inline(always)]` on everything in sight but the only thing that worked in the end is to dedup the calls by hand.
A couple of codegen tests are doing
```
// CHECK-NOT: slice_index_len_fail
```
However, that function no longer exists: [the only places](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frust+slice_index_len_fail&type=code) it occurs in the repo are in those tests.
So this PR updates the tests to check for the absense of the functions that are actually used today to panic for out-of-bounds indexing.
These don't optimize with debug assertions. For one of them, this
is due to the new alignment checks, for the other I'm not sure
what specifically blocks it.
Erik Desjardins