Files
paperclip-docs/docs/connectors/airtable.md
T
39633c2217 docs: connectors catalog, operator-first third revision (#124)
Connector catalog, setup guides, and shared access documentation,
followed by a final code-accuracy repair pass. This PR does not change
application behavior.

## Final accuracy pass

Checked against shipped Paperclip `v2026.916.0`, commit
`dffc2b3ca1b9e88fa21cb17493083e682dffd1ca`, rather than the dirty local
checkout or the earlier canary baseline.

- Corrects connector/method-specific identity choices, human audiences,
and managed GitHub versus PAT scope and verification.
- Explains that **Always allow** covers different arguments for the same
agent/action/connection, with project scope when present; uses actual
button labels and removes the test-panel control from review
instructions.
- Qualifies new-action quarantine, including safe-default read
exceptions. Removes unconditional approval guarantees.
- Separates provider channel/repository reach from Paperclip sender
authorization.
- Completes sandbox sign-in and model credential-selection instructions
from the current UI implementation.
- Repairs Notion's hub summary, removes incomplete optional
Notion/Sentry client-registration procedures, and corrects Linear's
provider-versus-Paperclip attribution.
- Removes unsupported Postman tier claims, contradictory Cloudinary/Mem0
verification assertions, API-equivalence claims, and overbroad
successful-test assurances.
- Retains Supabase's required project reference: both released method
definitions explicitly require it. An earlier review suggested
otherwise; release code is authoritative here.
- Updates the release baseline and removes draft commit chronology from
the public introduction.

## Availability and remaining runtime gates

- **Google:** Verification is pending. Per the product-owner
clarification, authorization can continue where Google offers an
Advanced option; this is not available for every account and does not
override Workspace policy or other Google prerequisites. Notices on the
hub and all Google guides now distinguish an unverified-app warning from
blocked authorization.
- **Slack is available but not yet fully functional; follow-up fixes are
planned.** For agent tools, the released OAuth endpoint/scope defaults
differ from Slack's documented MCP contract. The page now warns against
treating that route as production-ready and removes the misleading
bot-scope walkthrough. Chat-channel bot setup remains separate.
Engineering must reconcile the integration and run OAuth plus one read
before removing this warning. Source:
https://docs.slack.dev/ai/slack-mcp-server/
- No credentialed connector run was performed in this pass. Code
consistency, provider documentation, UI rendering, and successful live
execution are separate evidence levels. No claim of runtime
certification for all connectors.

## Validation

- Root build: 253 crawlable documentation pages.
- Full `docs:test`: all eight suites passed locally, including
root/subpath routes, sitemap history, fingerprints, navigation, skill
source blocks, crawlable links, doc-link resolution, and SEO metadata.
- Internal-link lint: 258 Markdown files; no broken internal links.
- Latest cleanup: full build, all eight docs:test suites, internal-link
lint and diff whitespace checks passed; 1,878 link-resolution checks.
- Fixed the Calendar MCP reference URL; browser-checked the five
inconclusive external destinations (Miro article loads; Asana, Google
Cloud, OpenAI and xAI reach sign-in/console screens). Authenticated
destinations were not tested beyond those screens.
- Replaced the Sandbox providers editorial TODO with a scope note and
removed the CLI overview's unfinished-guide announcement.
- Browser client navigation: 687 checks passed using installed Chrome.
Initial launch lacked the downloaded Playwright browser; rerun used
`DOCS_CHROMIUM_PATH` without changing the tests.
- Nine representative connector/shared pages at 1440px and 390px: HTTP
200, one article H1, no page-level horizontal overflow. Mobile
screenshot inspected; approval page opened in the Codex browser.
- Navigation audit reports three existing non-connector orphan files;
this patch does not alter those files or their navigation.

The previous revision's provider-page expansion, Google shared setup
guide, navigation additions, and accidental node_modules-symlink cleanup
remain in this PR. Internal review ledgers remain outside the
publication branch. No merge or production deployment authorized.

---------

Co-authored-by: DevRel Gemini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Nguyen <[email protected]>
2026-09-16 22:19:14 -10:00

4.0 KiB

seo_title, seo_description
seo_title seo_description
Airtable Connector Let agents read and update Airtable records. Base and table reach, enterprise allowlisting, a read test that changes nothing, and troubleshooting.

Airtable

Agents can work with your Airtable bases — finding records, reading fields, and creating or updating rows.

Before you connect

  • An Airtable account with access to the bases you want agents to use.
  • On an enterprise plan, an administrator may need to allowlist the client before anyone can connect. If authorization is refused or stays pending, that is the usual cause.

Connect Airtable

  1. Open Connectors and select Airtable.
  2. On the Access step, choose the identity and which agents may use the connection.
  3. Select Sign in with Airtable and complete browser sign-in, choosing what to share when Airtable asks.

Paperclip registers its client with Airtable automatically, so there is nothing to set up in a developer console.

Choose access

Base and table reach comes from Airtable: what the authorizing account can open, plus whatever you selected at Airtable's authorization screen. Paperclip has no base picker of its own, so narrow it there or by authorizing with an account that belongs to fewer workspaces.

Airtable bases often mix reference data with operational records, and an agent cannot tell the difference. Record writes and deletions matter:

Warning: Deleting a record in Airtable is not easily undone, and an agent updating the wrong field can be hard to spot in a large base. Keep writes on Ask first and deletions Off until you have watched the agent work. Airtable's own revision history is the recovery path.

Reads can stay Allowed. See Set action permissions.

Try it

In the "Customers" base, find the record for Northwind and tell me its status and owner fields. Do not change anything.

Compare the field values against the base. Reading one record whose values you already know confirms the credential, the base sharing, and the agent's permission without altering data — and unlike a summary, a specific field value is something you can check.

Then open the connection's activity and confirm the Airtable calls are listed there. The answer alone does not establish that the agent read the record rather than inferred it.

Note: Illustrative task, not a recorded test result. Substitute a base and record from your own account.

Troubleshooting and limitations

Problem Likely cause Fix
Authorization is refused or stays pending An enterprise administrator has not allowlisted the client Ask an Airtable administrator to allow it
A base is missing It was not shared at the authorization screen, or the account cannot open it Reconnect and include it, or get access in Airtable
A field is missing from results Most likely the field type is not exposed by the server, or Airtable permissions hide it Open the record in Airtable as the authorizing account and compare. If you can see the field there, it is the tool surface rather than permissions
A write is rejected Airtable refused it — field validation, a required field, or a view or table restriction Read the provider's error text in the action's raw response before changing anything; it names the reason more precisely than this table can
A record was changed unexpectedly A write action was set to Allowed Restore from Airtable's revision history, then tighten the settings
Needs attention The grant was revoked in Airtable Select Reconnect

Limitations: one Airtable account per connection. No base or table filter inside Paperclip. Airtable's API rate limits apply, so large scans are slow.