Files
paperclip-docs/docs/connectors/separate-accounts.md
T
39633c2217 docs: connectors catalog, operator-first third revision (#124)
Connector catalog, setup guides, and shared access documentation,
followed by a final code-accuracy repair pass. This PR does not change
application behavior.

## Final accuracy pass

Checked against shipped Paperclip `v2026.916.0`, commit
`dffc2b3ca1b9e88fa21cb17493083e682dffd1ca`, rather than the dirty local
checkout or the earlier canary baseline.

- Corrects connector/method-specific identity choices, human audiences,
and managed GitHub versus PAT scope and verification.
- Explains that **Always allow** covers different arguments for the same
agent/action/connection, with project scope when present; uses actual
button labels and removes the test-panel control from review
instructions.
- Qualifies new-action quarantine, including safe-default read
exceptions. Removes unconditional approval guarantees.
- Separates provider channel/repository reach from Paperclip sender
authorization.
- Completes sandbox sign-in and model credential-selection instructions
from the current UI implementation.
- Repairs Notion's hub summary, removes incomplete optional
Notion/Sentry client-registration procedures, and corrects Linear's
provider-versus-Paperclip attribution.
- Removes unsupported Postman tier claims, contradictory Cloudinary/Mem0
verification assertions, API-equivalence claims, and overbroad
successful-test assurances.
- Retains Supabase's required project reference: both released method
definitions explicitly require it. An earlier review suggested
otherwise; release code is authoritative here.
- Updates the release baseline and removes draft commit chronology from
the public introduction.

## Availability and remaining runtime gates

- **Google:** Verification is pending. Per the product-owner
clarification, authorization can continue where Google offers an
Advanced option; this is not available for every account and does not
override Workspace policy or other Google prerequisites. Notices on the
hub and all Google guides now distinguish an unverified-app warning from
blocked authorization.
- **Slack is available but not yet fully functional; follow-up fixes are
planned.** For agent tools, the released OAuth endpoint/scope defaults
differ from Slack's documented MCP contract. The page now warns against
treating that route as production-ready and removes the misleading
bot-scope walkthrough. Chat-channel bot setup remains separate.
Engineering must reconcile the integration and run OAuth plus one read
before removing this warning. Source:
https://docs.slack.dev/ai/slack-mcp-server/
- No credentialed connector run was performed in this pass. Code
consistency, provider documentation, UI rendering, and successful live
execution are separate evidence levels. No claim of runtime
certification for all connectors.

## Validation

- Root build: 253 crawlable documentation pages.
- Full `docs:test`: all eight suites passed locally, including
root/subpath routes, sitemap history, fingerprints, navigation, skill
source blocks, crawlable links, doc-link resolution, and SEO metadata.
- Internal-link lint: 258 Markdown files; no broken internal links.
- Latest cleanup: full build, all eight docs:test suites, internal-link
lint and diff whitespace checks passed; 1,878 link-resolution checks.
- Fixed the Calendar MCP reference URL; browser-checked the five
inconclusive external destinations (Miro article loads; Asana, Google
Cloud, OpenAI and xAI reach sign-in/console screens). Authenticated
destinations were not tested beyond those screens.
- Replaced the Sandbox providers editorial TODO with a scope note and
removed the CLI overview's unfinished-guide announcement.
- Browser client navigation: 687 checks passed using installed Chrome.
Initial launch lacked the downloaded Playwright browser; rerun used
`DOCS_CHROMIUM_PATH` without changing the tests.
- Nine representative connector/shared pages at 1440px and 390px: HTTP
200, one article H1, no page-level horizontal overflow. Mobile
screenshot inspected; approval page opened in the Codex browser.
- Navigation audit reports three existing non-connector orphan files;
this patch does not alter those files or their navigation.

The previous revision's provider-page expansion, Google shared setup
guide, navigation additions, and accidental node_modules-symlink cleanup
remain in this PR. Internal review ledgers remain outside the
publication branch. No merge or production deployment authorized.

---------

Co-authored-by: DevRel Gemini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Nguyen <[email protected]>
2026-09-16 22:19:14 -10:00

4.2 KiB

seo_title, seo_description
seo_title seo_description
Separate Accounts for Agents Pick between a personal credential, one shared organization identity, and an account dedicated to a single agent, and see what each choice changes.

Use separate accounts for people and agents

Paperclip supports personal, organization-shared, and dedicated-agent credentials. The choices shown during setup depend on the connector and connection method; not every method supports all three.

For example, managed GitHub offers My GitHub account or A dedicated account for an agent. Gmail offers personal or organization-shared access, not a dedicated-agent identity. A no-credential method has no account identity to choose. Assigning a connection to one agent does not change its credential type.

Credential types

Just me

"Agents use it only for runs where you are the responsible person."

Your own account, your own consent. An agent borrows it only on work where you are the responsible human. When someone else starts a run, this credential is not available to it.

Any active member can create one. Use it for a first connector, for anything touching a personal mailbox or calendar, and for evaluating a provider before the company commits to it.

Organization identity

One account shared with eligible people in the company. Setup can label this Any human in the company; the connection's human audience determines whose runs may use it. You separately choose which agents may use the connection. Sharing a credential does not bypass either audience.

Creating one is a manager operation. Paperclip enforces this on the server: "Only a connection manager can share this credential with the organization."

Use it for a service where a shared bot account is the intended model, and where you want one place to revoke.

Dedicated agent identity

"That agent always uses this account, regardless of who starts the run."

For a method that supports it, such as managed GitHub, this is an account belonging to one agent. Paperclip asks "Which agent owns this GitHub account?" and binds the credential to it. Runs started by anyone use that account when that agent acts.

Also a manager operation: "Only connection managers can authorize a dedicated agent identity."

Use it when the provider's own audit trail matters. A dedicated GitHub account means commits, comments, and pull requests are attributable to the agent rather than to a human who happened to trigger the run.

Choosing

Question Answer
Is this my personal account? Just me
Should the provider's logs name a separate account for the agent? Use A dedicated account for an agent where supported; otherwise connect a separate provider account and restrict its human and agent audiences
Is there a real shared service account for this? Organization identity
Am I still deciding whether to use this provider? Just me

What changes downstream

Attribution. A dedicated identity shows up in the provider as its own actor. A shared identity shows up as one account no matter who acted.

Revocation. Revoking an organization identity is immediate and total: "Installed agents lose this shared identity immediately." Revoking a personal grant affects only that person.

Shell tools. A dedicated GitHub identity is also handed to the run's shell, where per-tool Ask first does not apply. This shell access also applies to the managed personal GitHub identity; it is not unique to a dedicated-agent grant. See GitHub.

Changing later

The identity is fixed for a connection once it exists. On resume or reconnect, Paperclip treats the stored identity as authoritative and will not accept a contradictory grant kind from the client — that guard exists so a reconnect cannot quietly replace the credential behind an organization grant.

To move to a different identity, create a second connection with the identity you want, move agent access across, then delete the old one. Reauthorize, revoke, or disconnect covers the deletion.