Files
paperclip-docs/docs/connectors/mem0.md
T
d627632874 Release docs for paperclip v2026.1106.0 (#172)
Docs for parent release `v2026.1106.0` (`d69631b0`), up from
`v2026.1023.0` (`1b4c8038`): 515 parent commits.

## How this branch was built

The tag is 914 commits behind what `nightly` has drafted, so this branch
isn't cut from `nightly` HEAD. It starts at nightly commit `1952052`
(parent `043f2514`), 19 commits before the tag, then adds:

- the `main` hotfix (#160)
- the sync tooling from `nightly`
- docs for those 19 commits

Later nightly drafts stay on `nightly`, so no pages had to be removed.
No `nightly-draft/*` PRs are open.

## What changed

- **Runner by default:** new Claude, Codex, OpenCode and Pi agents start
on Paperclip Runner on supported hosts, with **Legacy runner** and
**Upgrade runner**.
- **Workspaces:** cleanup of finished workspaces, optional Git
expiration, and restore points for unsaved work. Restore points are off
by default.
- **New pages:** Prompt injection prevention, Google Workspace, GitHub
Copilot, Speko, Braintrust, Daytona, Ditto and Unikraft.
- **Breaking and upgrade notes:** the run history limit, Sentry run
failures off by default and the DSN variables, the Docker start command
for custom images, `--yes` on `instructions-file:delete`, and slower
migrations on large instances.
- **Also covered:** project repositories as skill sources, roster bulk
edit, Artifacts V1 (experimental, off by default), composer dismissal,
`expectedStatusVersion`, `unexecuted_review_stage`, and plugin workspace
providers.
- **Changelog:** a v2026.1106.0 entry in `reference/changelog.md`.

## Older text corrected

These were wrong at the tag, and most are also wrong on the live site:

- which permissions let an agent read a peer's configuration or change
instructions (`api/agents.md`)
- `decideNowCount`, which doesn't exist; the field is `deskBadgeCount`
- `file-resources` routes, which are board-only
- the **Create project** dialog fields, a CEO rule the code doesn't
enforce, and where a terminated agent's reports appear
- `instructions-file:put` and `:delete` examples that always failed
(`cli/agent.md`)
- a curl example that returned `422` (`api/cases.md`)
- Google Workspace **Reconnect** instructions, which claimed it reopens
the service picker
- the `permissionKey` table, which listed 8 of 21 keys
- drafting text at the end of `api/agents.md`

## ⚠ Please check these

- **Product behaviour that may be a parent bug.** The docs now describe
the tag's code, which you may prefer to fix upstream:
- The project **Environment** dropdown saves a choice, but runs ignore
it (`experimental/environments.md`).
- `environments:manage` is granted by roles but no environment route
checks it.
- `suggest-changes` is documented as agent-only, because only agents
have a consent path. Company skill policy decides skill edits.
- **Reader-visible mismatches in the parent UI.** The docs follow the
code. Upstream copy still mentions a "Built-in agents tab", says Copilot
"awaits qualification", and tells people to "Reconnect Google Workspace
to change access".

## ⚠ Post-tag leaks removed

Nothing to remove from an already-drafted page: post-tag surfaces such
as 1Password, Vercel, Supabase deploy, custom gateway onboarding and
Artifacts V1 as default never came onto this branch. Authors left out
post-tag hunks of the next nightly draft, and the reasons are in the run
notes.

## ⚠ Drift

None. Zero findings at the tag, from a full parent snapshot.

## ⚠ Verification Failures

The tag-accuracy gate reports one leak and nine review entries. None is
a real failure:

- **Leak:** `reference/cli/service.md`, `paperclipai payload and`. This
is a false positive; it's prose from a real message at
`cli/src/commands/service.ts:184`.
- **Review, 8 new connector pages:** the gate can't confirm new pages.
Reviewers confirmed each surface exists at the tag.
- **Review, `local_tools`:** an example value from the tag's Runner
README.

Not provable from code, and kept deliberately:

- `sandbox-providers.md` uses `sandbox.yaml`. The tag's README says
`install.yaml`, which returned 404 when checked. The upstream fix is
post-tag.
- The Google Workspace row about older OAuth brokers rests on release
notes and a design doc. The broker isn't in this repo.
- External claims about provider behaviour (for example Braintrust,
Daytona, Unikraft and Google scopes).

## ↻ Renames detected

None. The rename helper wasn't run: the 19-commit delta adds no new
adapter, skill, or plugin directories that it would check.

## Verification

All checks read a checkout pinned to the tag.

- **First round:** authors, a release-notes audit, an audit of
corrections stranded on `nightly`, an audit of 321 lines the last
realign dropped from `main` (about 130 checked directly in code), and
six fresh verifiers.
- **Second round:** seven new verifiers re-checked every changed area,
tracing behaviour rather than matching labels, and fixed about 50 more
defects. That volume means more may remain.
- **Limits of that second round:**
- Each verifier reported what it only string-matched. That includes
parts of Artifacts V1, the **Upgrade runner** notice, Copilot run
behaviour, and some Plugin SDK contract text.
  - The second-round fixes themselves weren't reviewed by a third round.
- **Gates:** `docs:build`, `docs:test` and `sync:check` pass.
- **Nothing was run against a live instance.** All of this comes from
reading code.

## Screenshots

**196 of 278 screenshots are stale and none were recaptured.** The list
is in `SCREENSHOTS_PENDING.md`. Some visibly differ from the text, such
as the removed **Run with provider trace** button and the old roster
tabs.

## After merge

1. Keep the PR title as is: `tag-docs-release.yml` reads the version
from it.
2. Confirm the `docs/v2026.1106.0` tag exists.
3. Run `node scripts/sync/realign-nightly.mjs release/v2026.1106.0
--push`, then audit for dropped lines and duplicated paragraphs, and set
`nightly` state back to `branch_mode: nightly`.
4. Check that `docs.paperclip.ing` serves the release: a new page, a new
claim, and the changelog's top entry.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: DevRel Gemini <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dotta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ClaudeCoder <[email protected]>
2026-11-07 13:02:42 +01:00

5.4 KiB

paperclip_version, seo_title, seo_description
paperclip_version seo_title seo_description
v2026.1106.0 Mem0 Connector Give agents a persistent memory store with Mem0. Whose memory is being read, how namespacing works, a scoped read test, and troubleshooting.

Mem0

Mem0 gives agents a persistent memory store that outlives a single task — a place to write down facts and retrieve them on a later run.

The question to settle before connecting is whose memory an agent is reading and writing. Mem0 organizes memories by identifiers you supply at call time, so the boundary is a convention you enforce, not something Paperclip checks.

Before you connect

  • The Memory connectors experimental setting turned on. It's off by default, and Mem0 doesn't appear in Connectors until it's on — see Connections and Apps. Turning it off later prevents new curated setup; a saved Mem0 connection keeps running and can reconnect or rotate its key. See Memory connectors for the full provider family.
  • A Mem0 account and an API key from its dashboard.
  • A decision about how you will namespace memories — per agent, per user, per project — and which identifiers agents should use.

Connect Mem0

  1. Open Connectors and select Mem0.
  2. Read the access line above the main button. It says who the connection signs in as and which agents can use it. To pick a different identity, narrow the agents, or use another sign-in method, select Change.
  3. Paste the Mem0 API key. Paperclip stores it as a secret.

Choose access

Warning: The API key reaches the whole Mem0 project, not one namespace. Any agent with this connection can in principle read and write any memory in that project by passing a different identifier. Separation between agents or users is a convention in how agents call the tools, not an enforced boundary.

Two practical consequences:

  • If different agents must not see each other's memories, give them separate connections with separate Mem0 projects and keys. Do not rely on identifier discipline alone.
  • Be deliberate about what goes in. Memories persist across tasks and are readable later by anything holding the key, so personal data or secrets written into Mem0 outlive the conversation that produced them.

Active actions start as Allowed, including writes and deletion.

Memory writes are easy to make and accumulate. An agent that writes on every run will build a store nobody curates, which degrades retrieval quality as much as it costs. Consider setting writes to Ask first at the start so you can see what an agent wants to remember. See Set action permissions.

Deletions remove memory; set them to Off if agents should not forget stored information.

The connection includes editable recall and save guidance under Agent instructions. You can turn it off without removing the tools, or edit it to describe your memory context. See Saved connection instructions.

Try it

Use a namespace that already contains a known memory. Replace the example identifier with the one you use in Mem0:

Search Mem0 for onboarding memories under user_id "YOUR_KNOWN_USER_ID".
Return the stored fact and its memory ID. Do not add, update, or delete anything.

Compare the result with the existing memory and inspect the task's connector calls. If your integration uses an agent or project identifier instead, supply that exact identifier.

An empty result does not establish that the intended namespace was read. Check the identifier, project, and tool result before changing credentials. If the store is empty, defer content verification or explicitly authorize a disposable write/read test in a test project; do not seed production memory just to test the connection.

Note: Illustrative task, not a recorded test result.

Troubleshooting and limitations

Problem Likely cause Fix
Searches return nothing The store is empty, or the agent queried a different identifier than it wrote under Check the identifier convention the agent is using
An agent reads another agent's memories Identifiers are a convention, not an enforced boundary Use separate Mem0 projects and separate connections
Retrieval quality drops over time The store has accumulated low-value memories Curate the store in Mem0; restrict what agents may write
Calls are rejected The key was revoked or belongs to a different project Reconnect with a current key
Something sensitive was written Memories persist beyond the task Delete it in Mem0 and narrow what agents may store
Needs attention The key stopped working Select Reconnect

Limitations: one Mem0 project per connection, and the key reaches all of it. Namespacing is not enforced by Paperclip. Mem0's own plan limits apply.

Sources