mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-07 06:16:06 -10:00
DottaandPaperclip
1a60d47804
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - The web server must retain run history across replacements. > - Older native runs can have local log files with no final size or digest. > - The normal importer correctly refuses to call those files complete. > - The existing raw archive mode requires the entire instance to stop work. > - This change gives settled sources a separate, guarded online archive path. > - Active work can continue while old evidence moves to object storage. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18864, #19678, #19688. The offline historical log archive path cannot migrate a busy instance. This change preserves exact surviving bytes without claiming complete native-event coverage or changing the original run outcome. ## What Changed - Add an explicit online option for settled native log files. Keep the default importer and offline option unchanged. - Require a released, closed native finalizer and no pending attempt, allocation, physical owner, or task binding. A stale lease or terminal run status alone is insufficient. - Use the canonical physical finalization lock and row locks. Check the source generation before claims and publication. - Read only the canonical, private local file. Reject aliases, symlinks, hard links, changed files, and changed owners. - Verify remote bytes before publishing a read-only archive and activity receipt in one transaction. Keep original files, errors, run status, event rows, and completeness metadata. - Document the command and its authority limits. Add real PostgreSQL and loopback S3 transport tests. ## Verification - The original implementation failed the new archive regression. It returned blocked instead of migrating the settled source. - Final source integration suite: 15 tests pass on disposable PostgreSQL and the bounded loopback S3 fixture. Coverage includes active unrelated work, failed and successful sources, a 4 MiB segment boundary, owner changes, file changes, unresolved owners, task bindings, allocations, and filesystem aliases. - The qualified source TypeScript check and module boundary check pass. - All 73 tests in five affected existing log-store, object-journal, cancellation, and migration-worker suites pass. The first borrowed dependency setup loaded work contexts from another worktree and failed four tests. Explicit database subpath aliases resolved that setup fault; no worker code changed. - Earlier test fault injection used the wrong storage method, and the first segment test reused a closed fixture endpoint. Those fixture defects were corrected before the final 15-test pass. - Local tests use Node 26. CI supplies the standard full typecheck, build, and test gates. Production object-storage credentials, live Railway replacement, and provider continuation are separate deployment acceptance steps. - Final exact-head CI: 59 successful contexts and 3 skipped, with all typecheck, build, test, E2E, security, and review gates complete. [Workflow evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42332349644). - The first CI attempt had 12 jobs interrupted by runner shutdown. Their logs end in cancellation, with no test assertion found. The failed/cancelled-only retry passed all 12 jobs and recomputed aggregates. The 38 original successful job records kept their original execution times and were not rerun. Original interruption logs remain retained. ## Risks - This path preserves raw history. It cannot recover missing source bytes or prove a complete native transcript. - Uploads can finish before a later source check fails. The run reference stays local in that case; a retry must still satisfy all authority checks. - The new option is explicit. It adds no startup worker, recurring poll, or background scan. - Source transactions hold scoped locks only for ownership checks and publication. Streaming and remote verification run outside those transactions. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 family through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host does not expose the exact model ID or context window to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <[email protected]>