mirror of
https://github.com/reactos/syzkaller.git
synced 2024-11-23 03:19:51 +00:00
1efec8f5c7
We've got several complains re using of word "crash" in all syzbot reports, e.g.: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/8rFLFgQR9fo/HBYUXIRyBAAJ https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/3nlcT8Wn7hg/8Th16X3DBAAJ Another suggested that "crash" is too hard for e.g. a LOCKDEP splat: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller/YzHLAU0dXpI/WOqq1ggBBQAJ Another terminology complaint was regarding the following fact. When we test a patch, we only detect if it still triggers _any_ issue (not necessary the original one). Currently we way "still triggers crash" (without any article, which is probably wrong from English perspective anyway). We did not say "the", but people assumed that and complained. Explicitly say "a". Also replace all uses of "bug" with "issue" for consistency. And use "final oops" instead of "final crash", which seems to be standard terminology at least for Linux: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_oops |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
app | ||
config | ||
dashapi |