mirror of
https://github.com/reactos/wine.git
synced 2024-11-25 20:59:54 +00:00
7500111cc9
and add a warning.
1055 lines
48 KiB
Plaintext
1055 lines
48 KiB
Plaintext
<chapter id="architecture">
|
|
<title>Overview</title>
|
|
<para>Brief overview of Wine's architecture...</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect1 id="basic-overview">
|
|
<title>Basic Overview</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Written by &name-ove-kaaven; <email>&email-ove-kaaven;</email>
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
With the fundamental architecture of Wine stabilizing, and
|
|
people starting to think that we might soon be ready to
|
|
actually release this thing, it may be time to take a look at
|
|
how Wine actually works and operates.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Wine Overview</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Wine is often used as a recursive acronym, standing for
|
|
"Wine Is Not an Emulator". Sometimes it is also known to be
|
|
used for "Windows Emulator". In a way, both meanings are
|
|
correct, only seen from different perspectives. The first
|
|
meaning says that Wine is not a virtual machine, it does not
|
|
emulate a CPU, and you are not supposed to install
|
|
Windows nor any Windows device drivers on top of it; rather,
|
|
Wine is an implementation of the Windows API, and can be
|
|
used as a library to port Windows applications to Unix. The
|
|
second meaning, obviously, is that to Windows binaries
|
|
(<filename>.exe</filename> files), Wine does look like
|
|
Windows, and emulates its behaviour and quirks rather
|
|
closely.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<note>
|
|
<title>Note</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The "Emulator" perspective should not be thought of as if
|
|
Wine is a typical inefficient emulation layer that means
|
|
Wine can't be anything but slow - the faithfulness to the
|
|
badly designed Windows API may of course impose a minor
|
|
overhead in some cases, but this is both balanced out by
|
|
the higher efficiency of the Unix platforms Wine runs on,
|
|
and that other possible abstraction libraries (like Motif,
|
|
GTK+, CORBA, etc) has a runtime overhead typically
|
|
comparable to Wine's.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</note>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Win16 and Win32</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Win16 and Win32 applications have different requirements;
|
|
for example, Win16 apps expect cooperative multitasking
|
|
among themselves, and to exist in the same address space,
|
|
while Win32 apps expect the complete opposite, i.e.
|
|
preemptive multitasking, and separate address spaces.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Wine now deals with this issue by launching a separate Wine
|
|
process for each Win32 process, but not for Win16 tasks.
|
|
Win16 tasks are now run as different intersynchronized
|
|
threads in the same Wine process; this Wine process is
|
|
commonly known as a <firstterm>WOW</firstterm> process,
|
|
referring to a similar mechanism used by Windows NT.
|
|
Synchronization between the Win16 tasks running in the WOW
|
|
process is normally done through the Win16 mutex - whenever
|
|
one of them is running, it holds the Win16 mutex, keeping
|
|
the others from running. When the task wishes to let the
|
|
other tasks run, the thread releases the Win16 mutex, and
|
|
one of the waiting threads will then acquire it and let its
|
|
task run.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>The Wine server</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The Wine server is among the most confusing concepts in Wine.
|
|
What is its function in Wine? Well, to be brief, it provides
|
|
Inter-Process Communication (IPC), synchronization, and
|
|
process/thread management. When the wineserver launches, it
|
|
creates a Unix socket for the current host based on (see below)
|
|
your home directory's <filename>.wine</filename> subdirectory (or
|
|
wherever the <constant>WINEPREFIX</constant> environment
|
|
variable points) - all Wine processes launched later
|
|
connects to the wineserver using this socket. (If a
|
|
wineserver was not already running, the first Wine process
|
|
will start up the wineserver in auto-terminate mode (i.e.
|
|
the wineserver will then terminate itself once the last Wine
|
|
process has terminated).)
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
In earlier versions of Wine the master socket mentioned
|
|
above was actually created in the configuration directory;
|
|
either your home directory's <filename>/wine</filename>
|
|
subdirectory or wherever the <constant>WINEPREFIX</constant>
|
|
environment variable points>. Since that might not be possible
|
|
the socket is actually created within the <filename>/tmp</filename>
|
|
directory with a name that reflects the configuration directory.
|
|
This means that there can actually be several separate copies of
|
|
the wineserver running; one per combination of user and
|
|
configuration directory. Note that you should not have several
|
|
users using the same configuration directory at the same time;
|
|
they will have different copies of the wineserver running and
|
|
this could well lead to problems with the registry information
|
|
that they are sharing.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Every thread in each Wine process has its own request
|
|
buffer, which is shared with the wineserver. When a thread
|
|
needs to synchronize or communicate with any other thread or
|
|
process, it fills out its request buffer, then writes a
|
|
command code through the socket. The wineserver handles the
|
|
command as appropriate, while the client thread waits for a
|
|
reply. In some cases, like with the various
|
|
<function>WaitFor</function> synchronization primitives, the
|
|
server handles it by marking the client thread as waiting
|
|
and does not send it a reply before the wait condition has
|
|
been satisfied.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The wineserver itself is a single and separate process and
|
|
does not have its own threading - instead, it is built on
|
|
top of a large <function>poll()</function> loop that alerts
|
|
the wineserver whenever anything happens, such as a client
|
|
having sent a command, or a wait condition having been satisfied.
|
|
There is thus no danger of race conditions inside the
|
|
wineserver itself - it is often called upon to do operations
|
|
that look completely atomic to its clients.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Because the wineserver needs to manage processes, threads,
|
|
shared handles, synchronization, and any related issues, all
|
|
the clients' Win32 objects are also managed by the
|
|
wineserver, and the clients must send requests to the
|
|
wineserver whenever they need to know any Win32 object
|
|
handle's associated Unix file descriptor (in which case the
|
|
wineserver duplicates the file descriptor, transmits it to
|
|
the client, and leaves it to the client to close the duplicate
|
|
when the client has finished with it).
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>The Service Thread</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The Wine server cannot do everything that needs to be done
|
|
behind the application's back, considering that it's not
|
|
threaded (so cannot do anything that would block or take any
|
|
significant amount of time), nor does it share the address
|
|
space of its client threads. Thus, a special event loop also
|
|
exists in each Win32 process' own address space, but handled
|
|
like one of the process' own threads. This special thread is
|
|
called the <firstterm>service thread</firstterm>, and does
|
|
things that it wouldn't be appropriate for the wineserver to
|
|
do. For example, it can call the application's asynchronous
|
|
system timer callbacks every time a timer event is signalled
|
|
(the wineserver handles the signalling, of course).
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
One important function of the service thread is to support
|
|
the X11 driver's event loop. Whenever an event arrives from
|
|
the X server, the service thread wakes up and sees the
|
|
event, processes it, and posts messages into the
|
|
application's message queues as appropriate. But this
|
|
function is not unique - any number of Wine core components
|
|
can install their own handlers into the service thread as
|
|
necessary, whenever they need to do something independent of
|
|
the application's own event loop. (At the moment, this
|
|
includes, but is not limited to, multimedia timers, serial
|
|
comms, and winsock async selects.)
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The implementation of the service thread is in
|
|
<filename>scheduler/services.c</filename>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Relays, Thunks, and DLL descriptors</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Loading a Windows binary into memory isn't that hard by
|
|
itself, the hard part is all those various DLLs and entry
|
|
points it imports and expects to be there and function as
|
|
expected; this is, obviously, what the entire Wine
|
|
implementation is all about. Wine contains a range of DLL
|
|
implementations. Each of the implemented (or
|
|
half-implemented) DLLs (which can be found in the
|
|
<filename>dlls/</filename> directory) need to make
|
|
themselves known to the Wine core through a DLL descriptor.
|
|
These descriptors point to such things as the DLL's
|
|
resources and the entry point table.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The DLL descriptor and entry point table is generated by the
|
|
<command>winebuild</command> tool (previously just named
|
|
<command>build</command>), taking DLL specification files
|
|
with the extension <filename>.spec</filename> as input. The
|
|
output file contains a global constructor that automatically
|
|
registers the DLL's descriptor with the Wine core at
|
|
runtime.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Once an application module wants to import a DLL, Wine will
|
|
look through its list of registered DLLs (if it's not
|
|
registered, it will look for it on disk). (Failing that, it
|
|
will look for a real Windows <filename>.DLL</filename> file
|
|
to use, and look through its imports, etc.) To resolve the
|
|
module's imports, Wine looks through the entry point table
|
|
and finds if it's defined there. (If not, it'll emit the
|
|
error "No handler for ...", which, if the application called
|
|
the entry point, is a fatal error.)
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Since Wine is 32-bit code itself, and if the compiler
|
|
supports Windows' calling convention, <type>stdcall</type>
|
|
(<command>gcc</command> does), Wine can resolve imports into
|
|
Win32 code by substituting the addresses of the Wine
|
|
handlers directly without any thunking layer in between.
|
|
This eliminates the overhead most people associate with
|
|
"emulation", and is what the applications expect anyway.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
However, if the user specified <parameter>--debugmsg
|
|
+relay</parameter>, a thunk layer is inserted between the
|
|
application imports and the Wine handlers; this layer is
|
|
known as "relay" because all it does is print out the
|
|
arguments/return values (by using the argument lists in the
|
|
DLL descriptor's entry point table), then pass the call on,
|
|
but it's invaluable for debugging misbehaving calls into
|
|
Wine code. A similar mechanism also exists between Windows
|
|
DLLs - Wine can optionally insert thunk layers between them,
|
|
by using <parameter>--debugmsg +snoop</parameter>, but since
|
|
no DLL descriptor information exists for non-Wine DLLs, this
|
|
is less reliable and may lead to crashes.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
For Win16 code, there is no way around thunking - Wine needs
|
|
to relay between 16-bit and 32-bit code. These thunks switch
|
|
between the app's 16-bit stack and Wine's 32-bit stack,
|
|
copies and converts arguments as appropriate, and handles
|
|
the Win16 mutex. Suffice to say that the kind of intricate
|
|
stack content juggling this results in, is not exactly
|
|
suitable study material for beginners.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Core and non-core DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<!-- FIXME: Should do this without the .jpg (AJ)
|
|
<para>
|
|
This slide (by Marcus Meissner of Caldera Systems, shown at
|
|
the Comdex 99) shows how Wine is meant to fit into the
|
|
Windows DLL model.
|
|
<mediaobject>
|
|
<imageobject>
|
|
<imagedata fileref="arch-layout.jpg" format="jpg">
|
|
</imageobject>
|
|
</mediaobject>
|
|
</para>
|
|
FIXME -->
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Wine must at least completely replace the "Big Three" DLLs
|
|
(KERNEL/KERNEL32, GDI/GDI32, and USER/USER32), which all
|
|
other DLLs are layered on top of. But since Wine is (for
|
|
various reasons) leaning towards the NT way of implementing
|
|
things, the NTDLL is another core DLL to be implemented in
|
|
Wine, and many KERNEL32 and ADVAPI32 features will be
|
|
implemented through the NTDLL. The wineserver and the
|
|
service thread provide the backbone for the implementation
|
|
of these core DLLs, and integration with the X11 driver
|
|
(which provides GDI/GDI32 and USER/USER32 functionality
|
|
along with the Windows standard controls). All non-core
|
|
DLLs, on the other hand, are expected to only use routines
|
|
exported by other DLLs (and none of these backbone services
|
|
directly), to keep the code base as tidy as possible. An
|
|
example of this is COMCTL32 (Common Controls), which should
|
|
only use standard GDI32- and USER32-exported routines.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1 id="module-overview">
|
|
<title>Module Overview</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
written by (???)
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
(Extracted from <filename>wine/documentation/internals</filename>)
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>KERNEL Module</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>Needs some content...</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>GDI Module</title>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>X Windows System interface</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The X libraries used to implement X clients (such as Wine)
|
|
do not work properly if multiple threads access the same
|
|
display concurrently. It is possible to compile the X
|
|
libraries to perform their own synchronization (initiated
|
|
by calling <function>XInitThreads()</function>). However,
|
|
Wine does not use this approach. Instead Wine performs its
|
|
own synchronization by putting a wrapper around every X
|
|
call that is used. This wrapper protects library access
|
|
with a critical section, and also arranges things so that
|
|
X libraries compiled without <option>-D_REENTRANT</option>
|
|
(eg. with global <varname>errno</varname> variable) will
|
|
work with Wine.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
To make this scheme work, all calls to X must use the
|
|
proper wrapper functions (or do their own synchronization
|
|
that is compatible with the wrappers). The wrapper for a
|
|
function <function>X...()</function> is calles
|
|
<function>TSX...()</function> (for "Thread Safe X ...").
|
|
So for example, instead of calling
|
|
<function>XOpenDisplay()</function> in the code,
|
|
<function>TSXOpenDisplay()</function> must be used.
|
|
Likewise, X header files that contain function prototypes
|
|
are wrapped, so that eg. <filename>"ts_xutil.h"</filename>
|
|
must be included rather than
|
|
<filename><X11/Xutil.h></filename>. It is important
|
|
that this scheme is used everywhere to avoid the
|
|
introduction of nondeterministic and hard-to-find errors
|
|
in Wine.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The code for the thread safe X wrappers is contained in
|
|
the <filename>tsx11/</filename> directory and in
|
|
<filename>include/ts*.h</filename>. To use a new (ie. not
|
|
previously used) X function in Wine, a new wrapper must be
|
|
created. The wrappers are generated (semi-)automatically
|
|
from the X11R6 includes using the
|
|
<filename>tools/make_X11wrappers</filename> perl script.
|
|
In simple cases it should be enough to add the name of the
|
|
new function to the list in
|
|
<filename>tsx11/X11_calls</filename>; if this does not
|
|
work the wrapper must be added manually to the
|
|
<filename>make_X11wrappers</filename> script. See comments
|
|
in <filename>tsx11/X11_calls</filename> and
|
|
<filename>tools/make_X11wrappers</filename> for further
|
|
details.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>USER Module</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
USER implements windowing and messaging subsystems. It also
|
|
contains code for common controls and for other
|
|
miscellaneous stuff (rectangles, clipboard, WNet, etc).
|
|
Wine USER code is located in <filename>windows/</filename>,
|
|
<filename>controls/</filename>, and
|
|
<filename>misc/</filename> directories.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>Windowing subsystem</title>
|
|
|
|
<para><filename>windows/win.c</filename></para>
|
|
<para><filename>windows/winpos.c</filename></para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Windows are arranged into parent/child hierarchy with one
|
|
common ancestor for all windows (desktop window). Each
|
|
window structure contains a pointer to the immediate
|
|
ancestor (parent window if <constant>WS_CHILD</constant>
|
|
style bit is set), a pointer to the sibling (returned by
|
|
<function>GetWindow(..., GW_NEXT)</function>), a pointer
|
|
to the owner window (set only for popup window if it was
|
|
created with valid <varname>hwndParent</varname>
|
|
parameter), and a pointer to the first child window
|
|
(<function>GetWindow(.., GW_CHILD)</function>). All popup
|
|
and non-child windows are therefore placed in the first
|
|
level of this hierarchy and their ancestor link
|
|
(<varname>wnd->parent</varname>) points to the desktop
|
|
window.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
Desktop window - root window
|
|
| \ `-.
|
|
| \ `-.
|
|
popup -> wnd1 -> wnd2 - top level windows
|
|
| \ `-. `-.
|
|
| \ `-. `-.
|
|
child1 child2 -> child3 child4 - child windows
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Horizontal arrows denote sibling relationship, vertical
|
|
lines - ancestor/child. To summarize, all windows with the
|
|
same immediate ancestor are sibling windows, all windows
|
|
which do not have desktop as their immediate ancestor are
|
|
child windows. Popup windows behave as topmost top-level
|
|
windows unless they are owned. In this case the only
|
|
requirement is that they must precede their owners in the
|
|
top-level sibling list (they are not topmost). Child
|
|
windows are confined to the client area of their parent
|
|
windows (client area is where window gets to do its own
|
|
drawing, non-client area consists of caption, menu,
|
|
borders, intrinsic scrollbars, and
|
|
minimize/maximize/close/help buttons).
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Another fairly important concept is
|
|
<firstterm>z-order</firstterm>. It is derived from the
|
|
ancestor/child hierarchy and is used to determine
|
|
"above/below" relationship. For instance, in the example
|
|
above, z-order is
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
child1->popup->child2->child3->wnd1->child4->wnd2->desktop.
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Current active window ("foreground window" in Win32) is
|
|
moved to the front of z-order unless its top-level
|
|
ancestor owns popup windows.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
All these issues are dealt with (or supposed to be) in
|
|
<filename>windows/winpos.c</filename> with
|
|
<function>SetWindowPos()</function> being the primary
|
|
interface to the window manager.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Wine specifics: in default and managed mode each top-level
|
|
window gets its own X counterpart with desktop window
|
|
being basically a fake stub. In desktop mode, however,
|
|
only desktop window has an X window associated with it.
|
|
Also, <function>SetWindowPos()</function> should
|
|
eventually be implemented via
|
|
<function>Begin/End/DeferWindowPos()</function> calls and
|
|
not the other way around.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect4>
|
|
<title>Visible region, clipping region and update region</title>
|
|
|
|
<para><filename>windows/dce.c</filename></para>
|
|
<para><filename>windows/winpos.c</filename></para>
|
|
<para><filename>windows/painting.c</filename></para>
|
|
|
|
<screen>
|
|
________________________
|
|
|_________ | A and B are child windows of C
|
|
| A |______ |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|---------' | |
|
|
| | B | |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
| `------------' |
|
|
| C |
|
|
`------------------------'
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Visible region determines which part of the window is
|
|
not obscured by other windows. If a window has the
|
|
<constant>WS_CLIPCHILDREN</constant> style then all
|
|
areas below its children are considered invisible.
|
|
Similarly, if the <constant>WS_CLIPSIBLINGS</constant>
|
|
bit is in effect then all areas obscured by its siblings
|
|
are invisible. Child windows are always clipped by the
|
|
boundaries of their parent windows.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
B has a <constant>WS_CLIPSIBLINGS</constant> style:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
. ______
|
|
: | |
|
|
| ,-----' |
|
|
| | B | - visible region of B
|
|
| | |
|
|
: `------------'
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
When the program requests a <firstterm>display
|
|
context</firstterm> (DC) for a window it can specify
|
|
an optional clipping region that further restricts the
|
|
area where the graphics output can appear. This area is
|
|
calculated as an intersection of the visible region and
|
|
a clipping region.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Program asked for a DC with a clipping region:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
______
|
|
,--|--. | . ,--.
|
|
,--+--' | | : _: |
|
|
| | B | | => | | | - DC region where the painting will
|
|
| | | | | | | be visible
|
|
`--|-----|---' : `----'
|
|
`-----'
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
When the window manager detects that some part of the window
|
|
became visible it adds this area to the update region of this
|
|
window and then generates <constant>WM_ERASEBKGND</constant> and
|
|
<constant>WM_PAINT</constant> messages. In addition,
|
|
<constant>WM_NCPAINT</constant> message is sent when the
|
|
uncovered area intersects a nonclient part of the window.
|
|
Application must reply to the <constant>WM_PAINT</constant>
|
|
message by calling the
|
|
<function>BeginPaint()</function>/<function>EndPaint()</function>
|
|
pair of functions. <function>BeginPaint()</function> returns a DC
|
|
that uses accumulated update region as a clipping region. This
|
|
operation cleans up invalidated area and the window will not
|
|
receive another <constant>WM_PAINT</constant> until the window
|
|
manager creates a new update region.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
A was moved to the left:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
________________________ ... / C update region
|
|
|______ | : .___ /
|
|
| A |_________ | => | ...|___|..
|
|
| | | | | : | |
|
|
|------' | | | : '---'
|
|
| | B | | | : \
|
|
| | | | : \
|
|
| `------------' | B update region
|
|
| C |
|
|
`------------------------'
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Windows maintains a display context cache consisting of
|
|
entries that include the DC itself, the window to which
|
|
it belongs, and an optional clipping region (visible
|
|
region is stored in the DC itself). When an API call
|
|
changes the state of the window tree, window manager has
|
|
to go through the DC cache to recalculate visible
|
|
regions for entries whose windows were involved in the
|
|
operation. DC entries (DCE) can be either private to the
|
|
window, or private to the window class, or shared
|
|
between all windows (Windows 3.1 limits the number of
|
|
shared DCEs to 5).
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect4>
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>Messaging subsystem</title>
|
|
|
|
<para><filename>windows/queue.c</filename></para>
|
|
<para><filename>windows/message.c</filename></para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Each Windows task/thread has its own message queue - this
|
|
is where it gets messages from. Messages can be:
|
|
<orderedlist>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
generated on the fly (<constant>WM_PAINT</constant>,
|
|
<constant>WM_NCPAINT</constant>,
|
|
<constant>WM_TIMER</constant>)
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
created by the system (hardware messages)
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
posted by other tasks/threads (<function>PostMessage</function>)
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
sent by other tasks/threads (<function>SendMessage</function>)
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</orderedlist>
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Message priority:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
First the system looks for sent messages, then for posted
|
|
messages, then for hardware messages, then it checks if
|
|
the queue has the "dirty window" bit set, and, finally, it
|
|
checks for expired timers. See
|
|
<filename>windows/message.c</filename>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
From all these different types of messages, only posted
|
|
messages go directly into the private message queue.
|
|
System messages (even in Win95) are first collected in the
|
|
system message queue and then they either sit there until
|
|
<function>Get/PeekMessage</function> gets to process them
|
|
or, as in Win95, if system queue is getting clobbered, a
|
|
special thread ("raw input thread") assigns them to the
|
|
private queues. Sent messages are queued separately and
|
|
the sender sleeps until it gets a reply. Special messages
|
|
are generated on the fly depending on the window/queue
|
|
state. If the window update region is not empty, the
|
|
system sets the <constant>QS_PAINT</constant> bit in the
|
|
owning queue and eventually this window receives a
|
|
<constant>WM_PAINT</constant> message
|
|
(<constant>WM_NCPAINT</constant> too if the update region
|
|
intersects with the non-client area). A timer event is
|
|
raised when one of the queue timers expire. Depending on
|
|
the timer parameters <function>DispatchMessage</function>
|
|
either calls the callback function or the window
|
|
procedure. If there are no messages pending the
|
|
task/thread sleeps until messages appear.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
There are several tricky moments (open for discussion) -
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
System message order has to be honored and messages
|
|
should be processed within correct task/thread
|
|
context. Therefore when <function>Get/PeekMessage</function> encounters
|
|
unassigned system message and this message appears not
|
|
to be for the current task/thread it should either
|
|
skip it (or get rid of it by moving it into the
|
|
private message queue of the target task/thread -
|
|
Win95, AFAIK) and look further or roll back and then
|
|
yield until this message gets processed when system
|
|
switches to the correct context (Win16). In the first
|
|
case we lose correct message ordering, in the second
|
|
case we have the infamous synchronous system message
|
|
queue. Here is a post to one of the OS/2 newsgroup I
|
|
found to be relevant:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
<attribution>by David Charlap</attribution>
|
|
<para>
|
|
" Here's the problem in a nutshell, and there is no
|
|
good solution. Every possible solution creates a
|
|
different problem.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
With a windowing system, events can go to many
|
|
different windows. Most are sent by applications or
|
|
by the OS when things relating to that window happen
|
|
(like repainting, timers, etc.)
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Mouse input events go to the window you click on
|
|
(unless some window captures the mouse).
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
So far, no problem. Whenever an event happens, you
|
|
put a message on the target window's message queue.
|
|
Every process has a message queue. If the process
|
|
queue fills up, the messages back up onto the system
|
|
queue.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is the first cause of apps hanging the GUI. If
|
|
an app doesn't handle messages and they back up into
|
|
the system queue, other apps can't get any more
|
|
messages. The reason is that the next message in
|
|
line can't go anywhere, and the system won't skip
|
|
over it.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This can be fixed by making apps have bigger private
|
|
message queues. The SIQ fix does this. PMQSIZE does
|
|
this for systems without the SIQ fix. Applications
|
|
can also request large queues on their own.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Another source of the problem, however, happens when
|
|
you include keyboard events. When you press a key,
|
|
there's no easy way to know what window the
|
|
keystroke message should be delivered to.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Most windowing systems use a concept known as
|
|
"focus". The window with focus gets all incoming
|
|
keyboard messages. Focus can be changed from window
|
|
to window by apps or by users clicking on windows.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is the second source of the problem. Suppose
|
|
window A has focus. You click on window B and start
|
|
typing before the window gets focus. Where should
|
|
the keystrokes go? On the one hand, they should go
|
|
to A until the focus actually changes to B. On the
|
|
other hand, you probably want the keystrokes to go
|
|
to B, since you clicked there first.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
OS/2's solution is that when a focus-changing event
|
|
happens (like clicking on a window), OS/2 holds all
|
|
messages in the system queue until the focus change
|
|
actually happens. This way, subsequent keystrokes
|
|
go to the window you clicked on, even if it takes a
|
|
while for that window to get focus.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The downside is that if the window takes a real long
|
|
time to get focus (maybe it's not handling events,
|
|
or maybe the window losing focus isn't handling
|
|
events), everything backs up in the system queue and
|
|
the system appears hung.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
There are a few solutions to this problem.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
One is to make focus policy asynchronous. That is,
|
|
focus changing has absolutely nothing to do with the
|
|
keyboard. If you click on a window and start typing
|
|
before the focus actually changes, the keystrokes go
|
|
to the first window until focus changes, then they
|
|
go to the second. This is what X-windows does.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Another is what NT does. When focus changes,
|
|
keyboard events are held in the system message
|
|
queue, but other events are allowed through. This is
|
|
"asynchronous" because the messages in the system
|
|
queue are delivered to the application queues in a
|
|
different order from that with which they were
|
|
posted. If a bad app won't handle the "lose focus"
|
|
message, it's of no consequence - the app receiving
|
|
focus will get its "gain focus" message, and the
|
|
keystrokes will go to it.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The NT solution also takes care of the application
|
|
queue filling up problem. Since the system delivers
|
|
messages asynchronously, messages waiting in the
|
|
system queue will just sit there and the rest of the
|
|
messages will be delivered to their apps.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The OS/2 SIQ solution is this: When a
|
|
focus-changing event happens, in addition to
|
|
blocking further messages from the application
|
|
queues, a timer is started. When the timer goes
|
|
off, if the focus change has not yet happened, the
|
|
bad app has its focus taken away and all messages
|
|
targeted at that window are skipped. When the bad
|
|
app finally handles the focus change message, OS/2
|
|
will detect this and stop skipping its messages.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As for the pros and cons:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The X-windows solution is probably the easiest. The
|
|
problem is that users generally don't like having to
|
|
wait for the focus to change before they start
|
|
typing. On many occasions, you can type and the
|
|
characters end up in the wrong window because
|
|
something (usually heavy system load) is preventing
|
|
the focus change from happening in a timely manner.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The NT solution seems pretty nice, but making the
|
|
system message queue asynchronous can cause similar
|
|
problems to the X-windows problem. Since messages
|
|
can be delivered out of order, programs must not
|
|
assume that two messages posted in a particular
|
|
order will be delivered in that same order. This
|
|
can break legacy apps, but since Win32 always had an
|
|
asynchronous queue, it is fair to simply tell app
|
|
designers "don't do that". It's harder to tell app
|
|
designers something like that on OS/2 - they'll
|
|
complain "you changed the rules and our apps are
|
|
breaking."
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The OS/2 solution's problem is that nothing happens
|
|
until you try to change window focus, and then wait
|
|
for the timeout. Until then, the bad app is not
|
|
detected and nothing is done."
|
|
</para>
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Intertask/interthread
|
|
<function>SendMessage</function>. The system has to
|
|
inform the target queue about the forthcoming message,
|
|
then it has to carry out the context switch and wait
|
|
until the result is available. Win16 stores necessary
|
|
parameters in the queue structure and then calls
|
|
<function>DirectedYield()</function> function.
|
|
However, in Win32 there could be several messages
|
|
pending sent by preemptively executing threads, and in
|
|
this case <function>SendMessage</function> has to
|
|
build some sort of message queue for sent messages.
|
|
Another issue is what to do with messages sent to the
|
|
sender when it is blocked inside its own
|
|
<function>SendMessage</function>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1 id="arch-dlls">
|
|
<title>Wine/Windows DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Based upon various messages on wine-devel especially by Ulrich
|
|
Weigand. Adapted by Michele Petrovski and Klaas van Gend.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
(Extracted from <filename>wine/documentation/dlls</filename>)
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
This document mainly deals with the status of current DLL
|
|
support by Wine. The Wine ini file currently supports
|
|
settings to change the load order of DLLs. The load order
|
|
depends on several issues, which results in different settings
|
|
for various DLLs.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Pros of Native DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Native DLLs of course guarantee 100% compatibility for
|
|
routines they implement. For example, using the native USER
|
|
DLL would maintain a virtually perfect and Windows 95-like
|
|
look for window borders, dialog controls, and so on. Using
|
|
the built-in Wine version of this library, on the other
|
|
hand, would produce a display that does not precisely mimic
|
|
that of Windows 95. Such subtle differences can be
|
|
engendered in other important DLLs, such as the common
|
|
controls library COMMCTRL or the common dialogs library
|
|
COMMDLG, when built-in Wine DLLs outrank other types in load
|
|
order.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
More significant, less aesthetically-oriented problems can
|
|
result if the built-in Wine version of the SHELL DLL is
|
|
loaded before the native version of this library. SHELL
|
|
contains routines such as those used by installer utilities
|
|
to create desktop shortcuts. Some installers might fail when
|
|
using Wine's built-in SHELL.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Cons of Native DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Not every application performs better under native DLLs. If
|
|
a library tries to access features of the rest of the system
|
|
that are not fully implemented in Wine, the native DLL might
|
|
work much worse than the corresponding built-in one, if at
|
|
all. For example, the native Windows GDI library must be
|
|
paired with a Windows display driver, which of course is not
|
|
present under Intel Unix and Wine.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Finally, occasionally built-in Wine DLLs implement more
|
|
features than the corresponding native Windows DLLs.
|
|
Probably the most important example of such behavior is the
|
|
integration of Wine with X provided by Wine's built-in USER
|
|
DLL. Should the native Windows USER library take load-order
|
|
precedence, such features as the ability to use the
|
|
clipboard or drag-and-drop between Wine windows and X
|
|
windows will be lost.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Deciding Between Native and Built-In DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Clearly, there is no one rule-of-thumb regarding which
|
|
load-order to use. So, you must become familiar with:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
what specific DLLs do
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
<para>
|
|
which other DLLs or features a given library interacts with
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
<para>
|
|
and use this information to make a case-by-case decision.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Load Order for DLLs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Using the DLL sections from the wine configuration file, the
|
|
load order can be tweaked to a high degree. In general it is
|
|
advised not to change the settings of the configuration
|
|
file. The default configuration specifies the right load
|
|
order for the most important DLLs.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The default load order follows this algorithm: for all DLLs
|
|
which have a fully-functional Wine implementation, or where
|
|
the native DLL is known not to work, the built-in library
|
|
will be loaded first. In all other cases, the native DLL
|
|
takes load-order precedence.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The <varname>DefaultLoadOrder</varname> from the
|
|
[DllDefaults] section specifies for all DLLs which version
|
|
to try first. See manpage for explanation of the arguments.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The [DllOverrides] section deals with DLLs, which need a
|
|
different-from-default treatment.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
The [DllPairs] section is for DLLs, which must be loaded in
|
|
pairs. In general, these are DLLs for either 16-bit or
|
|
32-bit applications. In most cases in Windows, the 32-bit
|
|
version cannot be used without its 16-bit counterpart. For
|
|
Wine, it is customary that the 16-bit implementations rely
|
|
on the 32-bit implementations and cast the results back to
|
|
16-bit arguments. Changing anything in this section is bound
|
|
to result in errors.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
For the future, the Wine implementation of Windows DLL seems
|
|
to head towards unifying the 16 and 32 bit DLLs wherever
|
|
possible, resulting in larger DLLs. They are stored in the
|
|
<filename>dlls/</filename> subdirectory using the 16-bit
|
|
name. For large DLLs, a split might be discussed.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Understanding What DLLs Do</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The following list briefly describes each of the DLLs
|
|
commonly found in Windows whose load order may be modified
|
|
during the configuration and compilation of Wine.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
(See also <filename>./DEVELOPER-HINTS</filename> or the
|
|
<filename>dlls/</filename> subdirectory to see which DLLs
|
|
are currently being rewritten for Wine)
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<!-- FIXME: Should convert this table into a VariableList element -->
|
|
<screen>
|
|
ADVAPI32.DLL: 32-bit application advanced programming interfaces
|
|
like crypto, systeminfo, security and event logging
|
|
AVIFILE.DLL: 32-bit application programming interfaces for the
|
|
Audio Video Interleave (AVI) Windows-specific
|
|
Microsoft audio-video standard
|
|
COMMCTRL.DLL: 16-bit common controls
|
|
COMCTL32.DLL: 32-bit common controls
|
|
COMDLG32.DLL: 32-bit common dialogs
|
|
COMMDLG.DLL: 16-bit common dialogs
|
|
COMPOBJ.DLL: OLE 16- and 32-bit compatibility libraries
|
|
CRTDLL.DLL: Microsoft C runtime
|
|
DCIMAN.DLL: 16-bit
|
|
DCIMAN32.DLL: 32-bit display controls
|
|
DDEML.DLL: DDE messaging
|
|
D3D*.DLL DirectX/Direct3D drawing libraries
|
|
DDRAW.DLL: DirectX drawing libraries
|
|
DINPUT.DLL: DirectX input libraries
|
|
DISPLAY.DLL: Display libraries
|
|
DPLAY.DLL, DPLAYX.DLL: DirectX playback libraries
|
|
DSOUND.DLL: DirectX audio libraries
|
|
GDI.DLL: 16-bit graphics driver interface
|
|
GDI32.DLL: 32-bit graphics driver interface
|
|
IMAGEHLP.DLL: 32-bit IMM API helper libraries (for PE-executables)
|
|
IMM32.DLL: 32-bit IMM API
|
|
IMGUTIL.DLL:
|
|
KERNEL32.DLL 32-bit kernel DLL
|
|
KEYBOARD.DLL: Keyboard drivers
|
|
LZ32.DLL: 32-bit Lempel-Ziv or LZ file compression
|
|
used by the installshield installers (???).
|
|
LZEXPAND.DLL: LZ file expansion; needed for Windows Setup
|
|
MMSYSTEM.DLL: Core of the Windows multimedia system
|
|
MOUSE.DLL: Mouse drivers
|
|
MPR.DLL: 32-bit Windows network interface
|
|
MSACM.DLL: Core of the Addressed Call Mode or ACM system
|
|
MSACM32.DLL: Core of the 32-bit ACM system
|
|
Audio Compression Manager ???
|
|
MSNET32.DLL 32-bit network APIs
|
|
MSVFW32.DLL: 32-bit Windows video system
|
|
MSVIDEO.DLL: 16-bit Windows video system
|
|
OLE2.DLL: OLE 2.0 libraries
|
|
OLE32.DLL: 32-bit OLE 2.0 components
|
|
OLE2CONV.DLL: Import filter for graphics files
|
|
OLE2DISP.DLL, OLE2NLS.DLL: OLE 2.1 16- and 32-bit interoperability
|
|
OLE2PROX.DLL: Proxy server for OLE 2.0
|
|
OLE2THK.DLL: Thunking for OLE 2.0
|
|
OLEAUT32.DLL 32-bit OLE 2.0 automation
|
|
OLECLI.DLL: 16-bit OLE client
|
|
OLECLI32.DLL: 32-bit OLE client
|
|
OLEDLG.DLL: OLE 2.0 user interface support
|
|
OLESVR.DLL: 16-bit OLE server libraries
|
|
OLESVR32.DLL: 32-bit OLE server libraries
|
|
PSAPI.DLL: Proces Status API libraries
|
|
RASAPI16.DLL: 16-bit Remote Access Services libraries
|
|
RASAPI32.DLL: 32-bit Remote Access Services libraries
|
|
SHELL.DLL: 16-bit Windows shell used by Setup
|
|
SHELL32.DLL: 32-bit Windows shell (COM object?)
|
|
TAPI/TAPI32/TAPIADDR: Telephone API (for Modems)
|
|
W32SKRNL: Win32s Kernel ? (not in use for Win95 and up!)
|
|
WIN32S16.DLL: Application compatibility for Win32s
|
|
WIN87EM.DLL: 80387 math-emulation libraries
|
|
WINASPI.DLL: Advanced SCSI Peripheral Interface or ASPI libraries
|
|
WINDEBUG.DLL Windows debugger
|
|
WINMM.DLL: Libraries for multimedia thunking
|
|
WING.DLL: Libraries required to "draw" graphics
|
|
WINSOCK.DLL: Sockets APIs
|
|
WINSPOOL.DLL: Print spooler libraries
|
|
WNASPI32.DLL: 32-bit ASPI libraries
|
|
WSOCK32.DLL: 32-bit sockets APIs
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
</chapter>
|
|
|
|
<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
|
|
Local variables:
|
|
mode: sgml
|
|
sgml-parent-document:("wine-devel.sgml" "set" "book" "part" "chapter" "")
|
|
End:
|
|
-->
|