No mention of privacy #119

Open
opened 2026-02-16 00:16:55 -05:00 by yindo · 7 comments
Owner

Originally created by @joeyfortuna on GitHub (May 19, 2024).

Please add documentation about how calls to the API are treated.
Are they stored and used for training?
Are they otherwise saved?
This service looks very promising but without that clarification, we can't endorse using it for business.

Thanks!

Originally created by @joeyfortuna on GitHub (May 19, 2024). Please add documentation about how calls to the API are treated. Are they stored and used for training? Are they otherwise saved? This service looks very promising but without that clarification, we can't endorse using it for business. Thanks!
Author
Owner

@lukebelbina commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024):

Agreed, I'd like to use this for a business use case but the documents are not to be shared or used for training

@lukebelbina commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024): Agreed, I'd like to use this for a business use case but the documents are not to be shared or used for training
Author
Owner

@etiennerev1222 commented on GitHub (May 26, 2024):

Please answer, it's an important topic

@etiennerev1222 commented on GitHub (May 26, 2024): Please answer, it's an important topic
Author
Owner

@spreeni commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2024):

Agreeing that this is a very important point that will hinder adaption within projects.

It would also be nice to be transparent or to chose in which region to process documents. This is relevant for the european GDPR, where sensitive data should not leave EU servers.

@spreeni commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2024): Agreeing that this is a very important point that will hinder adaption within projects. It would also be nice to be transparent or to chose in which region to process documents. This is relevant for the european GDPR, where sensitive data should not leave EU servers.
Author
Owner

@spreeni commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2024):

Also further transparency about which third-party services (and in which regions) are used would be nice.

@spreeni commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2024): Also further transparency about which third-party services (and in which regions) are used would be nice.
Author
Owner

@marco-bertelli commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024):

Same Situation Here, the tool is awesome but unless we have GDPR info i can't use it with my team for production EU projects

@marco-bertelli commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024): Same Situation Here, the tool is awesome but unless we have GDPR info i can't use it with my team for production EU projects
Author
Owner

@neuralnoy commented on GitHub (Nov 26, 2024):

Have the same issue here. Is there any news on this?

@neuralnoy commented on GitHub (Nov 26, 2024): Have the same issue here. Is there any news on this?
Author
Owner

@jdeepwell commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2024):

When I read about the cooperation with Microsoft/Azure

Announcing the LlamaIndex integration with Azure AI

I was hoping that there might be a way to run LlamaParse on Azure instances in the EU – but it does not seam so…

As long as there is no clear declaration in regards to GDPR, LlamaParse is basically unusable in Europe 😥

@jdeepwell commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2024): When I read about the cooperation with Microsoft/Azure > [Announcing the LlamaIndex integration with Azure AI](https://www.llamaindex.ai/blog/announcing-the-llamaindex-integration-with-azure-ai?utm_source=drip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=LlamaIndex+Newsletter+2024-11-26) I was hoping that there might be a way to run LlamaParse on Azure instances in the EU – but it does not seam so… As long as there is no clear declaration in regards to GDPR, LlamaParse is basically unusable in Europe 😥
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: run-llama/llama_cloud_services#119