Fix Coverity 1093493: Missing break in switch statement. No logical reason why LE_ORDER_EVADE should fall through to LE_ORDER_STAY_NEAR. Only switch statement in block without a break statement further indicates an oversight.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.icculus.org/fs2open/trunk/fs2_open@10577 387891d4-d844-0410-90c0-e4c51a9137d3
This commit is contained in:
Echelon9 authored and niffiwan committed 2014-04-22 19:22:26 +10:00
1 parent 389f4b3dfb
commit 26ee96a012
1 file changed
+1
+1
View File
@@ -9293,6 +9293,7 @@ ADE_FUNC(giveOrder, l_Ship, "enumeration Order, [object Target=nil, subsystem Ta
ai_mode = AI_GOAL_EVADE_SHIP;
ai_shipname = Ships[tgh->objp->instance].ship_name;
}
break;
}
case LE_ORDER_STAY_NEAR:
{