Cryptogams is Andy Polyakov's project used to create high speed crypto algorithms and share them with other developers. Cryptogams has a dual license. First is the OpenSSL license because Andy contributes to OpenSSL. Second is a BSD license for those who want a more permissive license.
Andy's implementation runs about 45% faster than C/C++ code. Testing on a 1.8 GHz Cortex-A17 shows Cryptograms at 45 cpb, and C++ at 79 cpb.
The integration instructions are documented at [Cryptogams SHA](https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Cryptogams_SHA) on the OpenSSL wiki.
Cryptogams is Andy Polyakov's project used to create high speed crypto algorithms and share them with other developers. Cryptogams has a dual license. First is the OpenSSL license because Andy contributes to OpenSSL. Second is a BSD license for those who want a more permissive license.
Andy's implementation runs about 45% faster than C/C++ code. Testing on a 1 GHz Cortex-A7 shows Cryptograms at 17 cpb, and C++ at 30 cpb.
The integration instructions are documented at [Cryptogams SHA](https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Cryptogams_SHA) on the OpenSSL wiki.
Add ARM SHA1 asm implementation from Cryptogams.
Cryptogams is Andy Polyakov's project used to create high speed crypto algorithms and share them with other developers. Cryptogams has a dual license. First is the OpenSSL license because Andy contributes to OpenSSL. Second is a BSD license for those who want a more permissive license.
Andy's implementation runs about 30% faster than C/C++ code. Testing on a 1 GHz Cortex-A7 shows Cryptograms at 16 cpb, and C++ at 23 cpb.
The integration instructions are documented at [Cryptogams SHA](https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Cryptogams_SHA) on the OpenSSL wiki.
Thanks to Jack Lloyd and Botan for allowing us to use the implementation.
The numbers for SSE2 are very good. When compared with Salsa20 ASM the results are:
* Salsa20 2.55 cpb; ChaCha/20 2.90 cpb
* Salsa20/12 1.61 cpb; ChaCha/12 1.90 cpb
* Salsa20/8 1.34 cpb; ChaCha/8 1.5 cpb
SIMON-64 and SIMON-128 have different ISA requirements. The same applies to SPECK-64 and SPECK-128. GCC generated code that resulted in a SIGILL due to the ISA differences on a down level machine. The instructions was a mtfprwz from POWER8. It was prsent in a function prologue on a POWER7 machine.
