stoatchat/self-hosted
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/stoatchat/self-hosted.git synced 2026-07-25 00:15:56 -04:00
Code Issues 42 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bug: in Debian Bullseye VM in docker january says 'GLIBC_2.29 not found required by ./january' #50

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00 by yindo · 5 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @accessiblepixel on GitHub (Dec 10, 2023).

What happened?

Expected all containers to launch after following instructions from self-hosted repo.

I am running a Debian Bullseye VM in KVM/QEMU with CPU type 'max' (for x86x64_v2 support which appears required by the application). The rest of the containers launch successfully but the january container doesn't launch. Getting the logs it says:
./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january)
./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january)

VM Info:
2 vCPU (Set to type 'max')
2GB RAM
32GB Disk

OS: Debian Version 11.8

Docker Info:
Docker Version: 20.10.5+dsfg1, build 55c4c88
Docker-Compose version: 1.25.0

Please let me know if you need me to provide anything else, and if I have posted this in the wrong place I'm still getting accustomed to github. <3

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Originally created by @accessiblepixel on GitHub (Dec 10, 2023). ### What happened? Expected all containers to launch after following instructions from self-hosted repo. I am running a Debian Bullseye VM in KVM/QEMU with CPU type 'max' (for x86x64_v2 support which appears required by the application). The rest of the containers launch successfully but the january container doesn't launch. Getting the logs it says: ./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january) ./january: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./january) VM Info: 2 vCPU (Set to type 'max') 2GB RAM 32GB Disk OS: Debian Version 11.8 Docker Info: Docker Version: 20.10.5+dsfg1, build 55c4c88 Docker-Compose version: 1.25.0 Please let me know if you need me to provide anything else, and if I have posted this in the wrong place I'm still getting accustomed to github. <3 Any pointers would be appreciated.
yindo added the bug label 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@typicalaimster commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023):

Looks like editing the docker-compose file and pulling the tag january:0.3.5 worked for me. Something is up with January's master build.

@typicalaimster commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023): Looks like editing the docker-compose file and pulling the tag january:0.3.5 worked for me. Something is up with January's master build.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@4kh00 commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2024):

On my local machine, this bug is happening. @typicalaimster's solution works with no side effects afaik.

@4kh00 commented on GitHub (Jan 19, 2024): On my local machine, this bug is happening. @typicalaimster's solution works with no side effects afaik.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@prologic commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024):

This is fixed by https://github.com/revoltchat/january/pull/39

@prologic commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024): This is fixed by https://github.com/revoltchat/january/pull/39
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@accessiblepixel commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024):

Awesome! Well feel free to close the issue once the pull has been reviewed/accepted (I think that's the right terminology) :)

Haven't had chance to test myself, but everyone's help has been appreciated and glad you were able to work it out ❤️

@accessiblepixel commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2024): Awesome! Well feel free to close the issue once the pull has been reviewed/accepted (I think that's the right terminology) :) Haven't had chance to test myself, but everyone's help has been appreciated and glad you were able to work it out ❤️
yindo commented 2026-02-16 12:51:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@insertish commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2024):

Fixed in build january:0.3.5-2, also matches :master and :latest tags so you can just pull it.

@insertish commented on GitHub (Jul 31, 2024): Fixed in build `january:0.3.5-2`, also matches `:master` and `:latest` tags so you can just pull it.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
improvement
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: stoatchat/self-hosted#50
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?