The extra dependency of sefcontext_compile on its object file causes the
compile and link step to be separated.
During the link step the CFLAGS are not passed, which might contain
optimization or sanitizer flags.
Reorder the LDLIBS requirements to avoid the symbol 'pcre_fullinfo'
being unresolvable at link time.
Current behavior:
gcc-11 **custom CFLAGS** -I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o sefcontext_compile.o sefcontext_compile.c
gcc-11 -L../src sefcontext_compile.o ../src/regex.o -lselinux -lpcre ../src/libselinux.a -lsepol -o sefcontext_compile
Changed:
gcc-11 **custom CFLAGS** -I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -L../src sefcontext_compile.c -lselinux ../src/libselinux.a -lpcre -lsepol -o sefcontext_compile
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
When checking for circular class permission declarations and a class
mapping is encountered, the class permissions for each map permission
must be checked. An assumption was made that there were no operators
in the class permissions. An operator in the class permissions would
cause a segfault.
Example causing segault:
(classmap cm1 (mp1))
(classmapping cm1 mp1 (CLASS (PERM)))
(classpermission cp1)
(classpermissionset cp1 (cm1 (all)))
For map class permissions, check each item in the permission list to
see if it is an operator. If it is not, then verify the class
permissions associated with the map permission. If it is an operator
and the operator is "all", then create a list of all permissions for
that map class and verify the class permissions associated with each
map permission. If it is a different operator, then it can be skipped.
This bug was found by the secilc-fuzzer.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
When compiling CIL policy using secilc's "-m" option (which allows
duplicate declarations for types and type attributes), a segfault
will occur if the type or type attribute being copied has already
been declared. This is because a search of the symbol table is made
during the copy and the original datum will be used if one is found.
The original datum will be considered a duplicate when an attempt is
made to add it to the symbol table. The original datum, which is still
in use, will then be destroyed and a segfault will follow soon after
that.
Instead, always create a new datum. When it is added the new datum
will be destroyed if it is a duplicate and duplicate declarations
are allowed.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
define_te_avtab_xperms_helper() allocates memory for the avrule, while
define_te_avtab_ioctl() does not transfer any ownership of it.
Free the affected memory.
Direct leak of 272 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x49bb8d in __interceptor_malloc (./checkpolicy/checkmodule+0x49bb8d)
#1 0x4f379c in define_te_avtab_xperms_helper ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2047:24
#2 0x4f379c in define_te_avtab_extended_perms ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2469:6
#3 0x4cf417 in yyparse ./checkpolicy/policy_parse.y:494:30
#4 0x4eaf35 in read_source_policy ./checkpolicy/parse_util.c:63:6
#5 0x50cccd in main ./checkpolicy/checkmodule.c:278:7
#6 0x7fbfa455ce49 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:314:16
Direct leak of 32 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x49bb8d in __interceptor_malloc (./checkpolicy/checkmodule+0x49bb8d)
#1 0x4f4a38 in avrule_sort_ioctls ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:1844:12
#2 0x4f4a38 in avrule_ioctl_ranges ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2021:6
#3 0x4f4a38 in define_te_avtab_ioctl ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2399:6
#4 0x4f4a38 in define_te_avtab_extended_perms ./checkpolicy/policy_define.c:2475:7
#5 0x4cf417 in yyparse ./checkpolicy/policy_parse.y:494:30
#6 0x4eaf35 in read_source_policy ./checkpolicy/parse_util.c:63:6
#7 0x50cccd in main ./checkpolicy/checkmodule.c:278:7
#8 0x7fbfa455ce49 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:314:16
Reported-by: liwugang <liwugang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
In case the source line value overflows or has a too big value in the
source policy print a warning.
policy_scan.l:273:19: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value -2 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned long' changed the value to 18446744073709551614 (64-bit, unsigned)
policy_scan.l:66:20: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 18446744073709551615 + 1 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned long'
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Error out instead of silently converting too big integer values in
policy sources.
policy_parse.y:893:41: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'unsigned long' of value 18446744073709551615 (64-bit, unsigned) to type 'unsigned int' changed the value to 4294967295 (32-bit, unsigned)
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Avoid implicit conversions from signed to unsigned values, found by
UB sanitizers, by using unsigned values in the first place.
dismod.c:92:42: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Example leak:
Indirect leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x49bacd in __interceptor_malloc (./checkpolicy/test/dismod+0x49bacd)
#1 0x58ae54 in add_i_to_a ./libsepol/src/util.c:55:21
#2 0x53ea8e in symtab_insert ./libsepol/src/policydb.c:1729:6
#3 0x536252 in roles_init ./libsepol/src/policydb.c:772:7
#4 0x536252 in policydb_init ./libsepol/src/policydb.c:892:7
#5 0x562ff1 in sepol_policydb_create ./libsepol/src/policydb_public.c:69:6
#6 0x521a7c in module_package_init ./libsepol/src/module.c:96:6
#7 0x521a7c in sepol_module_package_create ./libsepol/src/module.c:126:7
#8 0x4cfb80 in read_policy ./checkpolicy/test/dismod.c:750:7
#9 0x4cda10 in main ./checkpolicy/test/dismod.c:878:6
#10 0x7f8538d01e49 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:314:16
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Ideally they should be declared in the corresponding header file, but
the overall include style in the checkpolicy code is quite messy.
Declare them for now in the source file before defining them to silence
related compiler warnings:
policy_define.c:84:6: error: no previous prototype for function 'init_parser' [-Werror,-Wmissing-prototypes]
void init_parser(int pass_number)
^
policy_define.c:93:6: error: no previous prototype for function 'yyerror2' [-Werror,-Wmissing-prototypes]
void yyerror2(const char *fmt, ...)
^
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Make it more obvious which parameters are read-only and not being
modified and allow callers to pass const pointers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Add missing argument in usage message.
Drop redundant includes `optarg` and `optind`, which are declared in
<getopt.h>.
Mark file local functions static.
Drop unused function declaration.
Check closing file streams after writing, which can signal a failed
write or sync to disk and should be checked.
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Add missing argument in usage message.
Drop redundant includes `optarg` and `optind`, which are declared in
<getopt.h>.
Use consistent quit style by using `exit(1)`.
Mark read-only options struct const.
Check closing file streams after writing, which can signal a failed
write or sync to disk and should be checked.
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Found while running the checkpolicy/test/dispol binary.
Direct leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x49bacd in __interceptor_malloc (./checkpolicy/test/dispol+0x49bacd)
#1 0x5551e1 in ebitmap_set_bit ./libsepol/src/ebitmap.c:326:27
#2 0x517873 in create_gap_ebitmap ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:23:8
#3 0x517873 in validate_init ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:34:6
#4 0x50fa47 in validate_array_init ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:44:6
#5 0x50fa47 in validate_policydb ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:732:6
#6 0x4f22df in policydb_read ./libsepol/src/policydb.c:4538:6
#7 0x4cddb3 in main ./checkpolicy/test/dispol.c:437:8
#8 0x7f5980e47e49 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:314:16
Indirect leak of 48 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x49bacd in __interceptor_malloc (./checkpolicy/test/dispol+0x49bacd)
#1 0x5551e1 in ebitmap_set_bit ./libsepol/src/ebitmap.c:326:27
#2 0x517873 in create_gap_ebitmap ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:23:8
#3 0x517873 in validate_init ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:34:6
#4 0x50fa47 in validate_array_init ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:44:6
#5 0x50fa47 in validate_policydb ./libsepol/src/policydb_validate.c:732:6
#6 0x4f22df in policydb_read ./libsepol/src/policydb.c:4538:6
#7 0x4cddb3 in main ./checkpolicy/test/dispol.c:437:8
#8 0x7f5980e47e49 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:314:16
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Avoid implicit conversions from signed to unsigned values, found by
UB sanitizers, by using unsigned values in the first place.
util.c:95:15: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Duplicate declarations are allowed for type, typeattribute, and
optional statements. When an allowed duplicate declaration is found,
the duplicate datum is free'd in cil_add_decl_to_symtab() and SEPOL_OK
is returned. This works for all the rules where a duplicate declaration
is allowed, but it confuses scanning tools.
When cil_add_decl_to_symtab() finds an allowed duplicate declaration,
return SEPOL_EEXIST and free the duplicate datum in the original
calling function.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
libsepol/cil/src/cil_binary.c:4823: alloc_arg: "bounds_check_type" allocates memory that is stored into "bad".
libsepol/cil/src/cil_binary.c:4840: var_assign: Assigning: "cur" = "bad".
libsepol/cil/src/cil_binary.c:4844: noescape: Resource "cur" is not freed or pointed-to in "cil_avrule_from_sepol".
libsepol/cil/src/cil_binary.c:4847: leaked_storage: Variable "cur" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
libsepol/cil/src/cil_binary.c:4847: leaked_storage: Variable "bad" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
A line mark functions like an open parenthesis, so the number of
active line marks should be limited like the number of open
parenthesis.
This issue was found by the secilc-fuzzer.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
Fixes:
Error: RESOURCE_LEAK (CWE-772): [#def5]
libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c:2380: alloc_arg: "strs_init" allocates memory that is stored into "strs".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c:2386: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c:2386: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c:2386: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c:2507: leaked_storage: Variable "strs" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c:2315: alloc_arg: "strs_init" allocates memory that is stored into "strs".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c:2321: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c:2321: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c:2321: noescape: Resource "strs" is not freed or pointed-to in "strs_add".
libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c:2385: leaked_storage: Variable "strs" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
The function __cil_verify_syntax() is used to check the syntax of
CIL rules (and a few other common things like contexts and class
permissions). It does not correctly check the syntax combination
"CIL_SYN_STRING | CIL_SYN_N_LISTS, CIL_SYN_N_LISTS | CIL_SYN_END".
This should mean either a string followed by any number of lists
or any number of lists followed by the end of the rule. Instead,
while allowing the correct syntax, it allows any number of lists
followed by a string followed by any number of more lists followed
by the end of the rule and, also, any number of lists followed by a
string followed by the end of the rule.
Refactor the function to make it clearer to follow and so that once
checking begins for CIL_SYN_N_LISTS or CIL_SYN_N_STRINGS, then only
strings or lists are allowed until the end of the rule is found. In
addition, always check for CIL_SYN_END at the end.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Since the value passed into __cil_verify_syntax() as the len
parameter is always calculated from sizeof(syntax)/sizeof(*syntax),
use size_t for the calculated value in the calling function and for
the len parameter. In __cil_verify_syntax(), the variable i is only
compared to len, so make that size_t as well.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
For every call to cil_fill_classperms_list(), the syntax of the
whole rule, including the class permissions, has already been
checked. There is no reason to check it again. Also, because the
class permissions appear in the middle of some rules, like
constraints, the syntax array does not end with CIL_SYN_END. This
is the only case where the syntax array does not end with CIL_SYN_END.
This prevents __cil_verify_syntax() from requiring that the syntax
array ends with CIL_SYN_END.
Remove the redundant syntax checking in cil_fill_classperms_list().
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Update the CIL documentation for the in-statement processing and
duplicate macro and block declarations with block inheritance.
Duplicate macro and block declarations are allowed if they occur as
the result of block inheritance. Document the fact that inherited
macros are overridden by any macros already declared in a
namespace and that declaring a block in a namespace that will
inherit a block with the same name can be used to allow in-statements
to be used on the block.
The new in-statement syntax still supports the old syntax but adds
the ability to specify whether the in-statement should be resolved
before or after block inheritance is resolved.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
CIL's in-statement is resolved before block inheritance. This has
the advantage of allowing an in-statement to add rules to a base
block (say for a new permission) and having those rules also be
added everywhere that base block is inherited. But the disadvantage
of this behavior is that it is not possible to use an in-statement
on a block that is inherited for the simple reason that that block
does not exist when the in-statment is resolved.
Change the syntax of the in-statement to allow specifying whether
the rules should be added before or after inheritance. If neither
is specified, then the behavior remains the same. All current
in-statements will work as before.
Either the old syntax
(in container_id
cil_statement
...
)
or the new syntax
(in before|after container_id
cil_statement
...
)
may be used for in-statements. But only "(in after ..." will have
the new behavior. Using "(in before ..." will give the same
behavior as before.
Macro Example
;
(block b1
(macro m1 ((type ARG1))
(allow ARG1 self (C1 (P1a)))
)
)
(in after b1.m1
(allow ARG1 self (C1 (P1c)))
)
(type t1a)
(call b1.m1 (t1a))
(blockinherit b1)
(in after m1
(allow ARG1 self (C1 (P1b)))
)
(type t1b)
(call m1 (t1b))
;
This results in the following rules:
(allow t1a self (C1 (P1a)))
(allow t1a self (C1 (P1c)))
(allow t1b self (C1 (P1a)))
(allow t1b self (C1 (P1b)))
Block Example
;
(block b2
(block b
(type ta)
(allow ta self (C2 (P2a)))
)
)
(in before b2.b
(type tb)
(allow tb self (C2 (P2b)))
)
(block c2
(blockinherit b2)
(in after b
(type tc)
(allow tc self (C2 (P2c)))
)
)
;
This results in the following rules:
(allow b2.b.ta self (C2 (P2a)))
(allow b2.b.tb self (C2 (P2b)))
(allow c2.b.ta self (C2 (P2a)))
(allow c2.b.tb self (C2 (P2b)))
(allow c2.b.tc self (C2 (P2c)))
Using in-statements on optionals also works as expected.
One additional change is that blockabstract and blockinherit rules
are not allowed when using an after in-statement. This is because
both of those are resolved before an after in-statement would be
resolved.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Use a simpler recursive solution and set the head and tail pointers
of the starting node to NULL when done.
Remove the now uneeded setting of the head and tail pointers to NULL
in cil_resolve_in().
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Refactor the function __cil_build_ast_node_helper() by moving the
check for illegal statements and the large if-then-else statement
to determine which function to call to parse the policy statements
to different functions.
There is no need to keep walking the nodes of a policy statement
that has already been completely parsed. This means that the
remaining nodes of any policy statement that does not contain a list
of policy statements can be skipped. This was done inconsistently
before. The following policy statements now have all nodes after
the first one skipped: blockinherit, blockabstract, classcommon,
user, userattribute, userbounds, userprefix, type, typeattribute,
typealias, typealiasactual, typebounds, typepermissive, role,
userrole, roletype, roletransition, roleallow, roleattribute,
rolebounds, bool, tunable, typetransition, typechange, typemember,
sensitivity, sensitivityalias, senistivityaliasactual, category,
categoryalias, categoryaliasactual, and ipaddr. The only policy
statements that do contain a list of policy statements are:
block, in, tunableif, booleanif, true (conditional block), false
(conditional block), macro, optional, and src_info.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
If an optional that is to be disabled is the child of an optional that
is going to be disabled, then there is no reason to add that optional
to the stack of disabled optionals, because it is going to be destroyed
anyways. This means that there is no reason to maintain a stack of
disabled optionals at all.
Instead of using a stack to track disabled optionals, use a pointer
that points to the top-most optional that is to be disabled. When a
rule fails to resolve in an optional, if the disabled optional pointer
has not been set, then set it to that optional. If the pointer has
been set already, then the optional is already going to be destroyed,
so nothing else needs to be done. The resolution failure and the fact
that the optional is being disabled is reported in either case.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
File names for typetransition rules are stored in their own datums.
This allows them to be passed as a parameter, but there needs to be
a check in __cil_insert_name() so that parameter names are not
mistaken for file name strings. This check did not verify that a
matching parameter name had the flavor of CIL_NAME.
Check that the parameter flavor is CIL_NAME and that the paramter
name matches the file name to be stored in the datum.
This bug was found by the secilc-fuzzer.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
A list is created to store type attribute datums when resolving an
expandtypeattribute rule and that list needs to be destroyed if the
AST is reset or a memory leak will occur.
Destroy the list storing type attributes datums when resetting
expandtypeattribute rules.
This bug was found by the secilc-fuzzer.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
The function cil_tree_get_next_path() does not check whether the
parse tree node that stores the high-level language file path of a
src_info rule actually exists before trying to read the path. This
can result in a NULL dereference.
Check that all of the parse tree nodes of a src_info rule exist
before reading the data from them.
This bug was found by the secilc-fuzzer.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Import the setools classes needed for Python bindings from specific
setools modules in order to reduce the dependency footprint
of the Python bindings. Importing the top-level module causes all
setools modules to be loaded which includes the modules that require
networkx.
SELinux packages belong to the group of core system packages on Gentoo
Linux. It is desirable to keep the system set as small as possible,
and the dependency between setools and networkx seems to be the easiest
link to break without major loss of functionality.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
The commit d155b410d4 (libsepol/cil:
Check for duplicate blocks, optionals, and macros) added checks when
copying blocks, macros, and optionals so that a duplicate would cause
an exit with an error. Unfortunately, some policies exist that depend
on this behavior when using inheritance.
The behavior is as follows.
For macros only the first declared macro matters.
;
(macro m ((type ARG1))
(allow ARG1 self (CLASS (PERM1)))
)
(block b
(macro m ((type ARG1))
(allow ARG1 self (CLASS (PERM2)))
)
)
(blockinherit b)
(type t)
(call m (t))
;
For this policy segment, the macro m in block b will not be called.
Only the original macro m will be.
This behavior has been used to override macros that are going to
be inherited. Only the inherited macros that have not already been
declared in the destination namespace will be used.
Blocks seem to work fine even though there are two of them
;
(block b1
(blockinherit b2)
(block b
(type t1)
(allow t1 self (CLASS (PERM)))
)
)
(block b2
(block b
(type t2)
(allow t2 self (CLASS (PERM)))
)
)
(blockinherit b1)
;
In this example, the blockinherit of b2 will cause there to be
two block b's in block b1. Note that if both block b's tried to
declare the same type, then that would be an error. The blockinherit
of b1 will copy both block b's.
This behavior has been used to allow the use of in-statements for
a block that is being inherited. Since the in-statements are resolved
before block inheritance, this only works if a block with the same
name as the block to be inherited is declared in the namespace.
To support the use of these two behaviors, allow duplicate blocks
and macros when they occur as the result of block inheritance. In
any other circumstances and error for a redeclaration will be given.
Since the duplicate macro is not going to be used it is just skipped.
The duplicate block will use the datum of the original block. In both
cases a warning message will be produced (it will only be seen if
"-v" is used when compiling the policy).
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
In order to retain as much information as possible, when writing
out the CIL AST, use line mark notation to write out src_info
nodes. This includes using line marks to denote the original CIL
files the AST comes from.
The line numbers will not always be exactly correct because any
blank lines and comments in the original files will not be
represented in the AST.
Line marks are not written for the parse tree because the line
numbers will be widely inaccurate since each token will be on
a different line.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
CIL supports specifiying the original high-level language file and
line numbers when reporting errors. This is done through line marks
and is mostly used to report the original Refpolicy file and line
number for neverallow rules that have been converted to CIL.
As long as the line mark remain simple, everything works fine, but
the wrong line numbers will be reported with more complex nextings
of line marks.
Example:
;;* lms 100 file01.hll
(type t1a)
(allow t1a self (CLASS (PERM)))
;;* lmx 200 file02.hll
(type t2a)
(allow t2a self (CLASS (PERM)))
;;* lme
(type t1b)
(allow t1b self (CLASS (PERM)))
(allow bad1b self (CLASS (PERM))) ; file01.hll:101 (Should be 106)
;;* lme
The primary problem is that the tree nodes can only store one hll
line number. Instead a number is needed that can be used by any
number of stacked line mark sections. This number would increment
line a normal line number except when in lmx sections (that have
the same line number throughout the section because they represent
an expansion of a line -- like the expansion of a macro call. This
number can go backwards when exiting a lms section within a lmx
section, because line number will increase in the lms section, but
outside the lmx section, the line number did not advance.
This number is called the hll_offset and this is the value that is
now stored in tree nodes instead of the hll line number. To calculate
the hll line number for a rule, a search is made for an ancestor of
the node that is a line mark and the line number for a lms section
is the hll line number stored in the line mark, plus the hll offset
of the rule, minus the hll offset of the line mark node, minus one.
(hll_lineno + hll_offset_rule - hll_offset_lm - 1)
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
To be able to write line mark information when writing the AST,
the line mark kind and line number is needed in the src info.
Instead of indicating whether the src info is for CIL or a hll,
differentiate between CIL, a normal hll line mark, and an expanded
hll line mark. Also include the line mark line number in the src
info nodes.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
The functions cil_fill_integer() and cil_fill_integer64() exist in
cil_build_ast.c, but these functions take a node and it would be
better to have a function that can be used in add_hll_linemark()
so that the common functinality is in one place.
Create cil_string_to_uint32() and cil_string_to_uint64() and use
these functions in cil_fill_integer(), cil_fill_integer64(), and
add_hll_linemark().
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
CIL line mark rules are used to annotate the original line and file
of a rule. It is mostly used for neverallow rules that have been
converted to CIL.
Pushing the current line mark state after processing a line mark
section does not make sense since that information is never used.
When the line mark section ends the information is just popped and
discarded. It also makes pop_hll_info() more complicated than it
needs to be.
Push the line mark state first and simplfy pop_hll_info().
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
It clearer to check that the line mark type is a valid option right
after getting the token.
Check that the line mark type is one of the expected values right
awasy.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
In add_hll_linemark(), cil_lexer_next() is called and the token
type is not checked after the call for the expected type (SYMBOL).
Check that the token type is SYMBOL after calling cil_lexer_next().
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Every rule other than src_info has their syntax checked when
building the AST. It wasn't considered necessary for src_info rules
because they were expected to always be generated by the parser and
aren't part of the CIL language. But there is no check preventing
them from occurring in a policy and the secilc fuzzer found some bugs
by using src_info rules in a policy. This caused some syntax checking
to be added. Since the parse AST from secil2tree will contain src_info
rules and since the goal is to be able to compile the output of
secil2tree, it makes sense to check the syntax of src_info rules
in the same way that all of the other rules are checked.
Check the syntax of src_info statements in the same way every other
rule is checked.
Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
It should make it easier to reproduce bugs found by OSS-Fuzz locally
without docker. The fuzz target can be built and run with the corpus
OSS-Fuzz has accumulated so far by running the following commands:
```
./scripts/oss-fuzz.sh
wget https://storage.googleapis.com/selinux-backup.clusterfuzz-external.appspot.com/corpus/libFuzzer/selinux_secilc-fuzzer/public.zip
unzip -d CORPUS public.zip
./out/secilc-fuzzer CORPUS/
```
It was tested in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6026
by pointing OSS-Fuzz to the branch containing the patch and
running all the tests with all the sanitizers and fuzzing engines
there: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/actions/runs/1024673143
[v2]
[1] oss-fuzz: make shellcheck happy
[2] oss-fuzz: build libsepol only
The fuzz target covers libsepol so it's unnecessary to build everything
else. Apart from that, the "LDFLAGS" kludge was removed since libsepol
is compatible with the sanitizers flags passed via CFLAGS only. It
should be brought back one way or another eventually though to fix
build failures like
```
clang -L/home/vagrant/selinux/selinux/DESTDIR/usr/lib -L/home/vagrant/selinux/selinux/DESTDIR/usr/lib -L../src sefcontext_compile.o ../src/regex.o -lselinux -lpcre ../src/libselinux.a -lsepol -o sefcontext_compile
/usr/bin/ld: sefcontext_compile.o: in function `usage':
/home/vagrant/selinux/selinux/libselinux/utils/sefcontext_compile.c:271: undefined reference to `__asan_report_load8'
/usr/bin/ld: /home/vagrant/selinux/selinux/libselinux/utils/sefcontext_compile.c:292: undefined reference to `__asan_handle_no_return'
/usr/bin/ld: sefcontext_compile.o: in function `asan.module_ctor':
```
[3] oss-fuzz: make it possible to run the script more than once
by removing various build artifacts
[4] oss-fuzz: make it possible to run the script from any directory
[5] oss-fuzz: be a little bit more specific about what the script does
[6] oss-fuzz: stop overwriting all the Makefiles
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Vereshchagin <evvers@ya.ru>
Acked-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
The standard function `strerror(3)` is not thread safe. This does not
only affect the concurrent usage of libselinux itself but also with
other `strerror(3)` linked libraries.
Use the thread safe GNU extension format specifier `%m`[1].
libselinux already uses the GNU extension format specifier `%ms`.
[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Other-Output-Conversions.html
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
The standard function `strerror(3)` is not thread safe. This does not
only affect the concurrent usage of libselinux itself but also with
other `strerror(3)` linked libraries.
Use the thread safe GNU extension format specifier `%m`[1].
libselinux already uses the GNU extension format specifier `%ms`.
[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Other-Output-Conversions.html
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Fixes:
trans: a🅱️c:s9 -> a🅱️c:TOP SECRET != a🅱️c:TOP SECRET SUCCESS
untrans: a🅱️c:T O P S E C R E T -> a🅱️c:s9 != a🅱️c:s9 SUCCESS
Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Commit a60343cabf ("libsepol/cil: remove unnecessary hash tables")
removed FILENAME_TRANS_TABLE_SIZE macro that this comment was referring
to. Remove the comment as well to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
