wtf, most of the links from the website to the wiki faq are dead anchors.

fix a few here, but there are like dozens more.
This commit is contained in:
Roger Dingledine 2011-02-07 08:13:19 +00:00
parent e57c83630d
commit 336a322cc7

View File

@ -1142,11 +1142,11 @@ use the ReachableAddresses config options, e.g.:
<ul>
<li>Tor has built-in support for <a
href="<wikifaq>#LimitBandwidth">
href="<wikifaq>#WhatbandwidthshapingoptionsareavailabletoTorrelays">
rate limiting</a>. Further, if you have a fast
link but want to limit the number of bytes per
day (or week or month) that you donate, check out the <a
href="<wikifaq>#Hibernation">hibernation
href="<wikifaq>#HowcanIlimitthetotalamountofbandwidthusedbymyTorrelay">hibernation
feature</a>.
</li>
<li>Each Tor relay has an <a href="#ExitPolicies">exit policy</a> that
@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ use the ReachableAddresses config options, e.g.:
<li>If your relay is behind a NAT and it doesn't know its public
IP (e.g. it has an IP of 192.168.x.y), you'll need to set up port
forwarding. Forwarding TCP connections is system dependent but
<a href="<wikifaq>#ServerForFirewalledClients">this FAQ entry</a>
<a href="<wikifaq>#ImbehindaNATFirewall">this FAQ entry</a>
offers some examples on how to do this.
</li>
<li>Your relay will passively estimate and advertise its recent
@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ use the ReachableAddresses config options, e.g.:
<p>
The default exit policy allows access to many popular services
(e.g. web browsing), but <a href="<wikifaq>#DefaultPorts">restricts</a>
(e.g. web browsing), but <a href="<wikifaq>#Istherealistofdefaultexitports">restricts</a>
some due to abuse potential (e.g. mail) and some since
the Tor network can't handle the load (e.g. default
file-sharing ports). You can change your exit policy
@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ the same geographic location.
<li>If you're running on Solaris, OpenBSD, NetBSD, or
old FreeBSD, Tor is probably forking separate processes
rather than using threads. Consider switching to a <a
href="<wikifaq>#RelayOS">better
href="<wikifaq>#WhydoesntmyWindowsorotherOSTorrelayrunwell">better
operating system</a>.</li>
<li>If you still can't handle the memory load, consider reducing the
@ -1492,7 +1492,8 @@ we move to a "directory guard" design as well.
<p>
Requiring every Tor user to be a relay would help with scaling the
network to handle all our users, and <a href="<wikifaq>#RelayAnonymity">running a Tor
network to handle all our users, and <a
href="<wikifaq>#DoIgetbetteranonymityifIrunarelay">running a Tor
relay may help your anonymity</a>. However, many Tor users cannot be good
relays &mdash; for example, some Tor clients operate from behind restrictive
firewalls, connect via modem, or otherwise aren't in a position where they
@ -1529,7 +1530,7 @@ we move to a "directory guard" design as well.
<a href="<page getinvolved/volunteer>#Research">research section of the
volunteer page</a>: "Tor doesn't work very well when relays
have asymmetric bandwidth (e.g. cable or DSL)". It might be that <a
href="<wikifaq>#TransportIPnotTCP">switching
href="<wikifaq>#YoushouldtransportallIPpacketsnotjustTCPpackets.">switching
to UDP transport</a> is the simplest answer here &mdash; which alas is
not a very simple answer at all.
</p>