xemu/tests/acpi-utils.h

84 lines
3.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Utilities for working with ACPI tables
*
* Copyright (c) 2013 Red Hat Inc.
*
* Authors:
* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>,
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
* See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*/
#ifndef TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H
#define TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H
#include "hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h"
#include "libqtest.h"
/* DSDT and SSDTs format */
typedef struct {
union {
AcpiTableHeader *header;
uint8_t *aml; /* aml bytecode from guest */
};
gsize aml_len;
gchar *aml_file;
gchar *asl; /* asl code generated from aml */
gsize asl_len;
gchar *asl_file;
bool tmp_files_retain; /* do not delete the temp asl/aml */
} AcpiSdtTable;
#define ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, field, addr) \
do { \
qtest_memread(qts, addr, &field, sizeof(field)); \
addr += sizeof(field); \
maint: Fix macros with broken 'do/while(0); ' usage The point of writing a macro embedded in a 'do { ... } while (0)' loop (particularly if the macro has multiple statements or would otherwise end with an 'if' statement) is so that the macro can be used as a drop-in statement with the caller supplying the trailing ';'. Although our coding style frowns on brace-less 'if': if (cond) statement; else something else; that is the classic case where failure to use do/while(0) wrapping would cause the 'else' to pair with any embedded 'if' in the macro rather than the intended outer 'if'. But conversely, if the macro includes an embedded ';', then the same brace-less coding style would now have two statements, making the 'else' a syntax error rather than pairing with the outer 'if'. Thus, even though our coding style with required braces is not impacted, ending a macro with ';' makes our code harder to port to projects that use brace-less styles. The change should have no semantic impact. I was not able to fully compile-test all of the changes (as some of them are examples of the ugly bit-rotting debug print statements that are completely elided by default, and I didn't want to recompile with the necessary -D witnesses - cleaning those up is left as a bite-sized task for another day); I did, however, audit that for all files touched, all callers of the changed macros DID supply a trailing ';' at the callsite, and did not appear to be used as part of a brace-less conditional. Found mechanically via: $ git grep -B1 'while (0);' | grep -A1 \\\\ Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171201232433.25193-7-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-12-01 23:24:32 +00:00
} while (0)
#define ACPI_READ_ARRAY_PTR(qts, arr, length, addr) \
do { \
int idx; \
for (idx = 0; idx < length; ++idx) { \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, arr[idx], addr); \
} \
maint: Fix macros with broken 'do/while(0); ' usage The point of writing a macro embedded in a 'do { ... } while (0)' loop (particularly if the macro has multiple statements or would otherwise end with an 'if' statement) is so that the macro can be used as a drop-in statement with the caller supplying the trailing ';'. Although our coding style frowns on brace-less 'if': if (cond) statement; else something else; that is the classic case where failure to use do/while(0) wrapping would cause the 'else' to pair with any embedded 'if' in the macro rather than the intended outer 'if'. But conversely, if the macro includes an embedded ';', then the same brace-less coding style would now have two statements, making the 'else' a syntax error rather than pairing with the outer 'if'. Thus, even though our coding style with required braces is not impacted, ending a macro with ';' makes our code harder to port to projects that use brace-less styles. The change should have no semantic impact. I was not able to fully compile-test all of the changes (as some of them are examples of the ugly bit-rotting debug print statements that are completely elided by default, and I didn't want to recompile with the necessary -D witnesses - cleaning those up is left as a bite-sized task for another day); I did, however, audit that for all files touched, all callers of the changed macros DID supply a trailing ';' at the callsite, and did not appear to be used as part of a brace-less conditional. Found mechanically via: $ git grep -B1 'while (0);' | grep -A1 \\\\ Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171201232433.25193-7-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-12-01 23:24:32 +00:00
} while (0)
#define ACPI_READ_ARRAY(qts, arr, addr) \
ACPI_READ_ARRAY_PTR(qts, arr, sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]), addr)
#define ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER(qts, table, addr) \
do { \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->signature, addr); \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->length, addr); \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->revision, addr); \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->checksum, addr); \
ACPI_READ_ARRAY(qts, (table)->oem_id, addr); \
ACPI_READ_ARRAY(qts, (table)->oem_table_id, addr); \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->oem_revision, addr); \
ACPI_READ_ARRAY(qts, (table)->asl_compiler_id, addr); \
ACPI_READ_FIELD(qts, (table)->asl_compiler_revision, addr); \
maint: Fix macros with broken 'do/while(0); ' usage The point of writing a macro embedded in a 'do { ... } while (0)' loop (particularly if the macro has multiple statements or would otherwise end with an 'if' statement) is so that the macro can be used as a drop-in statement with the caller supplying the trailing ';'. Although our coding style frowns on brace-less 'if': if (cond) statement; else something else; that is the classic case where failure to use do/while(0) wrapping would cause the 'else' to pair with any embedded 'if' in the macro rather than the intended outer 'if'. But conversely, if the macro includes an embedded ';', then the same brace-less coding style would now have two statements, making the 'else' a syntax error rather than pairing with the outer 'if'. Thus, even though our coding style with required braces is not impacted, ending a macro with ';' makes our code harder to port to projects that use brace-less styles. The change should have no semantic impact. I was not able to fully compile-test all of the changes (as some of them are examples of the ugly bit-rotting debug print statements that are completely elided by default, and I didn't want to recompile with the necessary -D witnesses - cleaning those up is left as a bite-sized task for another day); I did, however, audit that for all files touched, all callers of the changed macros DID supply a trailing ';' at the callsite, and did not appear to be used as part of a brace-less conditional. Found mechanically via: $ git grep -B1 'while (0);' | grep -A1 \\\\ Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171201232433.25193-7-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2017-12-01 23:24:32 +00:00
} while (0)
#define ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(actual, expected) do { \
char ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str[5] = {}; \
memcpy(ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str, &actual, 4); \
g_assert_cmpstr(ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str, ==, expected); \
} while (0)
#define ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(actual, expected) do { \
char ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str[9] = {}; \
memcpy(ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str, &actual, 8); \
g_assert_cmpstr(ACPI_ASSERT_CMP_str, ==, expected); \
} while (0)
uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */