xemu-project/xemu
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git synced 2024-11-25 04:30:02 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

target/arm: Move NS TBFLAG from bit 19 to bit 6

Browse Source 
Move the NS TBFLAG down from bit 19 to bit 6, which has not
been used since commit c1e3781090 in 2015, when we
started passing the entire MMU index in the TB flags rather
than just a 'privilege level' bit.

This rearrangement is not strictly necessary, but means that
we can put M-profile-only bits next to each other rather
than scattered across the flag word.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190416125744.27770-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This commit is contained in:
Peter Maydell 2019-04-29 17:36:01 +01:00
parent 6808c4d2d2
commit 7fbb535f7a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
target/arm/cpu.h
View File

@ -3138,6 +3138,12 @@ FIELD(TBFLAG_ANY, BE_DATA, 23, 1)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, THUMB, 0, 1)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VECLEN, 1, 3)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VECSTRIDE, 4, 2)
/*
* Indicates whether cp register reads and writes by guest code should access
* the secure or nonsecure bank of banked registers; note that this is not
* the same thing as the current security state of the processor!
*/
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, NS, 6, 1)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VFPEN, 7, 1)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, CONDEXEC, 8, 8)
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, SCTLR_B, 16, 1)
@ -3145,11 +3151,6 @@ FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, SCTLR_B, 16, 1)
* checks on the other bits at runtime
*/
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, XSCALE_CPAR, 17, 2)
/* Indicates whether cp register reads and writes by guest code should access
* the secure or nonsecure bank of banked registers; note that this is not
* the same thing as the current security state of the processor!
*/
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, NS, 19, 1)
/* For M profile only, Handler (ie not Thread) mode */
FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 21, 1)
/* For M profile only, whether we should generate stack-limit checks */