The Configurable Fault Status Register for ARMv7M and v8M is
supposed to be byte and halfword accessible, but we were only
implementing word accesses. Add support for the other access
sizes, which are used by the Zephyr RTOS.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512742372-31517-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the v8M security extension, there should be two systick
devices, which use separate banked systick exceptions. The
register interface is banked in the same way as for other
banked registers, including the existence of an NS alias
region for secure code to access the nonsecure timer.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512154296-5652-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Generalize nvic_sysreg_ns_ops so that we can pass it an
arbitrary MemoryRegion which it will use as the underlying
register implementation to apply the NS-alias behaviour
to. We'll want this so we can do the same with systick.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1512154296-5652-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Fix an incorrect mask expression in the handling of v7M MPU_RBAR
reads that meant that we would always report the ADDR field as zero.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1509732813-22957-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This calculation of the first exception vector in
the ITNS<n> register being accessed:
int startvec = 32 * (offset - 0x380) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
is incorrect, because offset is in bytes, so we only want
to multiply by 8.
Spotted by Coverity (CID 1381484, CID 1381488), though it is
not correct that it actually overflows the buffer, because
we have a 'startvec + i < s->num_irq' guard.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1507650856-11718-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Coverity points out that we forgot the 'break' for
the SAU_CTRL write case (CID1381683). This has
no actual visible consequences because it happens
that the following case is effectively a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1507742676-9908-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
When we added support for the new SHCSR bits in v8M in commit
437d59c17e the code to support writing to the new HARDFAULTPENDED
bit was accidentally only added for non-secure writes; the
secure banked version of the bit should also be writable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-21-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the register interface for the SAU: SAU_CTRL,
SAU_TYPE, SAU_RNR, SAU_RBAR and SAU_RLAR. None of the
actual behaviour is implemented here; registers just
read back as written.
When the CPU definition for Cortex-M33 is eventually
added, its initfn will set cpu->sau_sregion, in the same
way that we currently set cpu->pmsav7_dregion for the
M3 and M4.
Number of SAU regions is typically a configurable
CPU parameter, but this patch doesn't provide a
QEMU CPU property for it. We can easily add one when
we have a board that requires it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add the new M profile Secure Fault Status Register
and Secure Fault Address Register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the v7M architecture, there is an invariant that if the CPU is
in Handler mode then the CONTROL.SPSEL bit cannot be nonzero.
This in turn means that the current stack pointer is always
indicated by CONTROL.SPSEL, even though Handler mode always uses
the Main stack pointer.
In v8M, this invariant is removed, and CONTROL.SPSEL may now
be nonzero in Handler mode (though Handler mode still always
uses the Main stack pointer). In preparation for this change,
change how we handle this bit: rename switch_v7m_sp() to
the now more accurate write_v7m_control_spsel(), and make it
check both the handler mode state and the SPSEL bit.
Note that this implicitly changes the point at which we switch
active SP on exception exit from before we pop the exception
frame to after it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reset for devices does not include an automatic clear of the
device state (unlike CPU state, where most of the state
structure is cleared to zero). Add some missing initialization
of NVIC state that meant that the device was left in the wrong
state if the guest did a warm reset.
(In particular, since we were resetting the computed state like
s->exception_prio but not all the state it was computed
from like s->vectors[x].active, the NVIC wound up in an
inconsistent state that could later trigger assertion failures.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1506092407-26985-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() and armv7m_nvic_complete_irq()
to handle banked exceptions:
* acknowledge needs to use the correct vector, which may be
in sec_vectors[]
* acknowledge needs to return to its caller whether the
exception should be taken to secure or non-secure state
* complete needs its caller to tell it whether the exception
being completed is a secure one or not
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-20-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Handle banking of SHCSR: some register bits are banked between
Secure and Non-Secure, and some are only accessible to Secure.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-19-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ICSR NVIC register is banked for v8M. This doesn't
require any new state, but it does mean that some bits
are controlled by BFHNFNMINS and some bits must work
with the correct banked exception. There is also a new
in v8M PENDNMICLR bit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-18-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now that we have a banked FAULTMASK register and banked exceptions,
we can implement the correct check in cpu_mmu_index() for whether
the MPU_CTRL.HFNMIENA bit's effect should apply. This bit causes
handlers which have requested a negative execution priority to run
with the MPU disabled. In v8M the test has to check this for the
current security state and so takes account of banking.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-17-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update nvic_exec_prio() to support the v8M changes:
* BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and PRIMASK are all banked
* AIRCR.PRIS can affect NS priorities
* AIRCR.BFHFNMINS affects FAULTMASK behaviour
These changes mean that it's no longer possible to
definitely say that if FAULTMASK is set it overrides
PRIMASK, and if PRIMASK is set it overrides BASEPRI
(since if PRIMASK_NS is set and AIRCR.PRIS is set then
whether that 0x80 priority should take effect or the
priority in BASEPRI_S depends on the value of BASEPRI_S,
for instance). So we switch to the same approach used
by the pseudocode of working through BASEPRI, PRIMASK
and FAULTMASK and overriding the previous values if
needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-16-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
If AIRCR.BFHFNMINS is clear, then although NonSecure HardFault
can still be pended via SHCSR.HARDFAULTPENDED it mustn't actually
preempt execution. The simple way to achieve this is to clear the
enable bit for it, since the enable bit isn't guest visible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In v7M, the fixed-priority exceptions are:
Reset: -3
NMI: -2
HardFault: -1
In v8M, this changes because Secure HardFault may need
to be prioritised above NMI:
Reset: -4
Secure HardFault if AIRCR.BFHFNMINS == 1: -3
NMI: -2
Secure HardFault if AIRCR.BFHFNMINS == 0: -1
NonSecure HardFault: -1
Make these changes, including support for changing the
priority of Secure HardFault as AIRCR.BFHFNMINS changes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When escalating to HardFault, we must go into Lockup if we
can't take the synchronous HardFault because the current
execution priority is already at or below the priority of
HardFault. In v7M HF is always priority -1 so a simple < 0
comparison sufficed; in v8M the priority of HardFault can
vary depending on whether it is a Secure or NonSecure
HardFault, so we must check against the priority of the
HardFault exception vector we're about to use.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In armv7m_nvic_set_pending() we have to compare the
priority of an exception against the execution priority
to decide whether it needs to be escalated to HardFault.
In the specification this is a comparison against the
exception's group priority; for v7M we implemented it
as a comparison against the raw exception priority
because the two comparisons will always give the
same answer. For v8M the existence of AIRCR.PRIS and
the possibility of different PRIGROUP values for secure
and nonsecure exceptions means we need to explicitly
calculate the vector's group priority for this check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the set_prio() function take a bool indicating
whether to pend the secure or non-secure version of a banked
interrupt, and use this to implement the correct banking
semantics for the SHPR registers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the armv7m_nvic_set_pending() and armv7m_nvic_clear_pending()
functions take a bool indicating whether to pend the secure
or non-secure version of a banked interrupt, and update the
callsites accordingly.
In most callsites we can simply pass the correct security
state in; in a couple of cases we use TODO comments to indicate
that we will return the code in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the nvic_recompute_state() code to handle the security
extension and its associated banked registers.
Code that uses the resulting cached state (ie the irq
acknowledge and complete code) will be updated in a later
commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M, the NVIC has a new set of registers per interrupt,
NVIC_ITNS<n>. These determine whether the interrupt targets Secure
or Non-secure state. Implement the register read/write code for
these, and make them cause NVIC_IABR, NVIC_ICER, NVIC_ISER,
NVIC_ICPR, NVIC_IPR and NVIC_ISPR to RAZ/WI for non-secure
accesses to fields corresponding to interrupts which are
configured to target secure state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the code in nvic_rettobase() so that it checks the
sec_vectors[] array as well as the vectors[] array if needed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Application Interrupt and Reset Control Register has some changes
for v8M:
* new bits SYSRESETREQS, BFHFNMINS and PRIS: these all have
real state if the security extension is implemented and otherwise
are constant
* the PRIGROUP field is banked between security states
* non-secure code can be blocked from using the SYSRESET bit
to reset the system if SYSRESETREQS is set
Implement the new state and the changes to register read and write.
For the moment we ignore the effects of the secure PRIGROUP.
We will implement the effects of PRIS and BFHFNMIS later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of looking up the pending priority
in nvic_pending_prio(), cache it in a new state struct
field. The calculation of the pending priority given
the interrupt number is more complicated in v8M with
the security extension, so the caching will be worthwhile.
This changes nvic_pending_prio() from returning a full
(group + subpriority) priority value to returning a group
priority. This doesn't require changes to its callsites
because we use it only in comparisons of the form
execution_prio > nvic_pending_prio()
and execution priority is always a group priority, so
a test (exec prio > full prio) is true if and only if
(execprio > group_prio).
(Architecturally the expected comparison is with the
group priority for this sort of "would we preempt" test;
we were only doing a test with a full priority as an
optimisation to avoid the mask, which is possible
precisely because the two comparisons always give the
same answer.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
With banked exceptions, just the exception number in
s->vectpending is no longer sufficient to uniquely identify
the pending exception. Add a vectpending_is_s_banked bool
which is true if the exception is using the sec_vectors[]
array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the v8M security extension, some exceptions must be banked
between security states. Add the new vecinfo array which holds
the state for the banked exceptions and migrate it if the
CPU the NVIC is attached to implements the security extension.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
In several places we were unconditionally applying the
nvic_gprio_mask() to a priority value. This is incorrect
if the priority is one of the fixed negative priority
values (for NMI and HardFault), so don't do it.
This bug would have caused both NMI and HardFault to be
considered as the same priority and so NMI wouldn't
correctly preempt HardFault.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505137930-13255-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the CFSR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Not all the bits in this register are banked: the BFSR
bits [15:8] are shared between S and NS, and we store them
in the NS copy of the register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-19-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MMFAR register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-18-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the CCR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
This is slightly more complicated than the other "add banking"
patches because there is one bit in the register which is not
banked. We keep the live data in the NS copy of the register,
and adjust it on register reads and writes. (Since we don't
currently implement the behaviour that the bit controls, there
is nowhere else that needs to care.)
This patch includes the enforcement of the bits which are newly
RES1 in ARMv8M.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-17-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU_CTRL register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-16-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU_RNR register banked if v8M security extensions are
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU registers MPU_MAIR0 and MPU_MAIR1 banked if v8M security
extensions are enabled.
We can freely add more items to vmstate_m_security without
breaking migration compatibility, because no CPU currently
has the ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY bit enabled and so this
subsection is not yet used by anything.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-14-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the MPU registers MPU_MAIR0 and MPU_MAIR1 banked if v8M security
extensions are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the VTOR register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-12-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For v8M the range 0xe002e000..0xe002efff is an alias region which
for secure accesses behaves like a NonSecure access to the main
SCS region. (For nonsecure accesses including when the security
extension is not implemented, it is RAZ/WI.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-11-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the FAULTMASK register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Note that we do not yet implement the functionality of the new
AIRCR.PRIS bit (which allows the effect of the NS copy of FAULTMASK to
be restricted).
This patch includes the code to determine for v8M which copy
of FAULTMASK should be updated on exception exit; further
changes will be required to the exception exit code in general
to support v8M, so this is just a small piece of that.
The v8M ARM ARM introduces a notation where individual paragraphs
are labelled with R (for rule) or I (for information) followed
by a random group of subscript letters. In comments where we want
to refer to a particular part of the manual we use this convention,
which should be more stable across document revisions than using
section or page numbers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-9-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the PRIMASK register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Note that we do not yet implement the functionality of the new
AIRCR.PRIS bit (which allows the effect of the NS copy of PRIMASK to
be restricted).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Make the BASEPRI register banked if v8M security extensions are enabled.
Note that we do not yet implement the functionality of the new
AIRCR.PRIS bit (which allows the effect of the NS copy of BASEPRI to
be restricted).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-7-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
As part of ARMv8M, we need to add support for the PMSAv8 MPU
architecture.
PMSAv8 differs from PMSAv7 both in register/data layout (for instance
using base and limit registers rather than base and size) and also in
behaviour (for example it does not have subregions); rather than
trying to wedge it into the existing PMSAv7 code and data structures,
we define separate ones.
This commit adds the data structures which hold the state for a
PMSAv8 MPU and the register interface to it. The implementation of
the MPU behaviour will be added in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1503414539-28762-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ARMv7M architecture specifies that most of the addresses in the
PPB region (which includes the NVIC, systick and system registers)
are not accessible to unprivileged accesses, which should
BusFault with a few exceptions:
* the STIR is configurably user-accessible
* the ITM (which we don't implement at all) is always
user-accessible
Implement this by switching the register access functions
to the _with_attrs scheme that lets us distinguish user
mode accesses.
This allows us to pull the handling of the CCR.USERSETMPEND
flag up to the level where we can make it generate a BusFault
as it should for non-permitted accesses.
Note that until the core ARM CPU code implements turning
MEMTX_ERROR into a BusFault the registers will continue to
act as RAZ/WI to user accesses.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1501692241-23310-16-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The armv7m_nvic.h header file was accidentally placed in
include/hw/arm; move it to include/hw/intc to match where
its corresponding .c file lives.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1501692241-23310-15-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We currently store the M profile CPU register state PRIMASK and
FAULTMASK in the daif field of the CPU state in its I and F
bits. This is a legacy from the original implementation, which
tried to share the cpu_exec_interrupt code between A profile
and M profile. We've since separated out the two cases because
they are significantly different, so now there is no common
code between M and A profile which looks at env->daif: all the
uses are either in A-only or M-only code paths. Sharing the state
fields now is just confusing, and will make things awkward
when we implement v8M, where the PRIMASK and FAULTMASK
registers are banked between security states.
Switch M profile over to using v7m.faultmask and v7m.primask
fields for these registers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1501692241-23310-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Remove an out of date comment which says there's only one
item in the NVIC container region -- we put systick into its
own device object a while back and so now there are two
things in the container.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1501692241-23310-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Almost all of the PMSAv7 state is in the pmsav7 substruct of
the ARM CPU state structure. The exception is the region
number register, which is in cp15.c6_rgnr. This exception
is a bit odd for M profile, which otherwise generally does
not store state in the cp15 substruct.
Rename cp15.c6_rgnr to pmsav7.rnr accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 1501153150-19984-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The M series MPU is almost the same as the already implemented R
profile MPU (v7 PMSA). So all we need to implement here is the MPU
register interface in the system register space.
This implementation has the same restriction as the R profile MPU
that it doesn't permit regions to be sized down smaller than 1K.
We also do not yet implement support for MPU_CTRL.HFNMIENA; this
bit should if zero disable use of the MPU when running HardFault,
NMI or with FAULTMASK set to 1 (ie at an execution priority of
less than zero) -- if the MPU is enabled we don't treat these
cases any differently.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
Message-id: 1493122030-32191-13-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
[PMM: Keep all the bits in mpu_ctrl field, rather than
using SCTLR bits for them; drop broken HFNMIENA support;
various cleanup]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The SysTick timer isn't really part of the NVIC proper;
we just modelled it that way back when we couldn't
easily have devices that only occupied a small chunk
of a memory region. Split it out into its own device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1487604965-23220-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
