The ASPEED SoCs contain a single register that returns random data when
read. This models that register so that guests can use it.
The random number data register has a corresponding control register,
however it returns data regardless of the state of the enabled bit, so
the model follows this behaviour.
When the qcrypto call fails we exit as the guest uses the random number
device to feed it's entropy pool, which is used for cryptographic
purposes.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Message-id: 20180613114836.9265-1-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Some register blocks of the ast2500 are protected by protection key
registers which require the right magic value to be written to those
registers to allow those registers to be mutated.
Register manuals indicate that writing the correct magic value to these
registers should cause subsequent reads from those values to return 1,
and writing any other value should cause subsequent reads to return 0.
Previously, qemu implemented these registers incorrectly: the registers
were handled as simple memory, meaning that writing some value x to a
protection key register would result in subsequent reads from that
register returning the same value x. The protection was implemented by
ensuring that the current value of that register equaled the magic
value.
This modifies qemu to have the correct behaviour: attempts to write to a
ast2500 protection register results in a transition to 1 or 0 depending
on whether the written value is the correct magic. The protection logic
is updated to ensure that the value of the register is nonzero.
This bug caused deadlocks with u-boot HEAD: when u-boot is done with a
protectable register block, it attempts to lock it by writing the
bitwise inverse of the correct magic value, and then spinning forever
until the register reads as zero. Since qemu implemented writes to these
registers as ordinary memory writes, writing the inverse of the magic
value resulted in subsequent reads returning that value, leading to
u-boot spinning forever.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-id: 20180220132627.4163-1-hlandau@devever.net
[PMM: fixed incorrect code indentation]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ASPEED hardware contains a lock register for the SCU that disables
any writes to the SCU when it is locked. The machine comes up with the
lock enabled, but on all known hardware u-boot will unlock it and leave
it unlocked when loading the kernel.
This means the kernel expects the SCU to be unlocked. When booting from
an emulated ROM the normal u-boot unlock path is executed. Things don't
go well when booting using the -kernel command line, as u-boot does not
run first.
Change behaviour so that when a kernel is passed to the machine, set the
reset value of the SCU to be unlocked.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 20171114122018.12204-1-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-id: 1480434248-27138-12-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
There is not much differences with the A0 revision apart from the DDR
calibration.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-id: 1480434248-27138-10-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Based on previous work done by Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1473438177-26079-9-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
AST2400_A0_SILICON_REV is defined twice. Fix this by including the
definition in the header file as well as the routine to check if a
silicon revision is supported. It will useful to reuse in other
controllers.
Let's add also AST2500_A0_SILICON_REV for future use.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 1467994016-11678-5-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-id: 1467994016-11678-2-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tracing configurations error out currently as follows:
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c: In function ‘aspeed_scu_read’:
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c:130:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘qemu_log_mask’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c:130:9: error: nested extern declaration of ‘qemu_log_mask’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c:130:23: error: ‘LOG_GUEST_ERROR’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c:130:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c: In function ‘aspeed_scu_write’:
/home/travis/build/pranith/qemu/hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c:154:23: error: ‘LOG_GUEST_ERROR’ undeclared (first use in this function)
This is caused by a missing header file. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-id: 20160627215304.821-1-bobby.prani@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The SCU is a collection of chip-level control registers that manage the
various functions supported by ASPEED SoCs. Typically the bits control
interactions with clocks, external hardware or reset behaviour, and we
can largly take a hands-off approach to reads and writes.
Firmware makes heavy use of the state to determine how to boot, but the
reset values vary from SoC to SoC (eg AST2400 vs AST2500). A qdev
property is exposed so that the integrating SoC model can configure the
silicon revision, which in-turn selects the appropriate reset values.
Further qdev properties are exposed so the board model can configure the
board-dependent hardware strapping.
Almost all provided AST2400 reset values are specified by the datasheet.
The notable exception is SOC_SCRATCH1, where we mark the DRAM as
successfully initialised to avoid unnecessary dark corners in the SoC's
u-boot support.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Message-id: 1466744305-23163-2-git-send-email-andrew@aj.id.au
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: drop unnecessary inttypes.h include]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
