Check that the core can once again receive packets before asking the
net layer to do a flush. This will make it more convenient to flush
packets when adding new conditions to can_receive.
Add missing if braces while moving the can_receive() core code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Message-id: 92e15e12a6964274f4bc0eb71b61a7d94326f6c6.1441873621.git.crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
All NICs have a cleanup function that, in most cases, zeroes the pointer
to the NICState. In some cases, it frees data belonging to the NIC.
However, this function is never called except when exiting from QEMU.
It is not necessary to NULL pointers and free data here; the right place
to do that would be in the device's unrealize function, after calling
qemu_del_nic. Zeroing the NIC multiple times is also wrong for multiqueue
devices.
This cleanup function gets in the way of making the NetClientStates for
the NIC hold an object_ref reference to the object, so get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
After commit 767adce2d, they are redundant. This way we don't assign them
except when needed. Once there, there were lots of cases where the ".fields"
indentation was wrong:
.fields = (VMStateField []) {
and
.fields = (VMStateField []) {
Change all the combinations to:
.fields = (VMStateField[]){
The biggest problem (apart from aesthetics) was that checkpatch complained
when we copy&pasted the code from one place to another.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
[PMM: fixed minor conflict, corrected commit message typos]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In case the smc91c111 interface signals that it cannot receive more
packets the packets are queued and further reception will be disabled.
In case the interface is again ready to receive packets notify the upper
layer.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
The recent rearrangement of include files had some minor errors:
devices.h is not ARM specific and should not be in arm/
arm.h should be in arm/
Move these two headers to correct this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>