The test was off-by-one, because tag_last points to the
last byte of the tag to check, thus tag_last - prev_page
will equal TARGET_PAGE_SIZE when we use the first byte
of the next page.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/403
Reported-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210612195707.840217-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
_Static_assert is part of C11, which is now required.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-9-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
All previous users now use C11 _Generic.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-8-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This is both more and less complicated than our expansion
using __builtin_choose_expr and __builtin_types_compatible_p.
The expansion through QEMU_MAKE_LOCKABLE_ doesn't work because
we're not emumerating all of the types within the same _Generic,
which results in errors about unhandled cases. We must also
handle void* explicitly, so that the NULL constant can be used.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-7-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We will shortly convert lockable.h to _Generic, and we cannot
have two compatible types in the same expansion. Wrap QemuMutex
in a struct, and unwrap in qemu-thread-posix.c.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Create macros for file+line expansion in qemu_rec_mutex_unlock
like we have for qemu_mutex_unlock.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Move the declarations from thread-win32.h into thread.h
and remove the macro redirection from thread-posix.h.
This will be required by following cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Now that the minimum gcc version is 7.5, we can use C11.
This will allow lots of cleanups to the code, currently
hidden behind macros in include/qemu/compiler.h.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
When the selective CR0 write intercept is set, all writes to bits in
CR0 other than CR0.TS or CR0.MP cause a VMEXIT.
Signed-off-by: Lara Lazier <laramglazier@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210616123907.17765-5-laramglazier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The combination of unset CD and set NW bit in CR0 is illegal.
CR0[63:32] are also reserved and need to be zero.
(AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual, V2, 15.5)
Signed-off-by: Lara Lazier <laramglazier@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210616123907.17765-4-laramglazier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Zero VMRUN intercept and ASID should cause an immediate VMEXIT
during the consistency checks performed by VMRUN.
(AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual, V2, 15.5)
Signed-off-by: Lara Lazier <laramglazier@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210616123907.17765-3-laramglazier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Added cpu_svm_has_intercept to reduce duplication when checking the
corresponding intercept bit outside of cpu_svm_check_intercept_param
Signed-off-by: Lara Lazier <laramglazier@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210616123907.17765-2-laramglazier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
_Static_assert is part of C11, which is now required.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-9-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
All previous users now use C11 _Generic.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-8-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
This is both more and less complicated than our expansion
using __builtin_choose_expr and __builtin_types_compatible_p.
The expansion through QEMU_MAKE_LOCKABLE_ doesn't work because
we're not emumerating all of the types within the same _Generic,
which results in errors about unhandled cases. We must also
handle void* explicitly, so that the NULL constant can be used.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-7-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
We will shortly convert lockable.h to _Generic, and we cannot
have two compatible types in the same expansion. Wrap QemuMutex
in a struct, and unwrap in qemu-thread-posix.c.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Create macros for file+line expansion in qemu_rec_mutex_unlock
like we have for qemu_mutex_unlock.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Move the declarations from thread-win32.h into thread.h
and remove the macro redirection from thread-posix.h.
This will be required by following cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Now that the minimum gcc version is 7.5, we can use C11.
This will allow lots of cleanups to the code, currently
hidden behind macros in include/qemu/compiler.h.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210614233143.1221879-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The meson.build file defines supported_cpus which does not contain
x32, and x32 is not one of meson's stable built-in values:
https://mesonbuild.com/Reference-tables.html#cpu-families
Signed-off-by: David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <878s3jrzm0.fsf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's print the new property.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-16-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's include the new property. Instead of relying on CONFIG_LINUX,
let's try to unconditionally grab the property and treat errors as
"does not exist".
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-15-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's print the property.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-14-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's include the property, which can be helpful when debugging,
for example, to spot misuse of MAP_PRIVATE which can result in some ugly
corner cases (e.g., double-memory consumption on shmem).
Use the same description we also use for describing the property.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-13-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We return information on the currently configured memory backends and
don't configure them, so decribe what the currently set properties
express.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-12-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's provide a way to control the use of RAM_NORESERVE via memory
backends using the "reserve" property which defaults to true (old
behavior).
Only Linux currently supports clearing the flag (and support is checked at
runtime, depending on the setting of "/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory").
Windows and other POSIX systems will bail out with "reserve=false".
The target use case is virtio-mem, which dynamically exposes memory
inside a large, sparse memory area to the VM. This essentially allows
avoiding to set "/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory == 0") when using
virtio-mem and also supporting hugetlbfs in the future.
As really only Linux implements RAM_NORESERVE right now, let's expose
the property only with CONFIG_LINUX. Setting the property to "false"
will then only fail in corner cases -- for example on very old kernels
or when memory overcommit was completely disabled by the admin.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-11-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's support RAM_NORESERVE via MAP_NORESERVE on Linux. The flag has no
effect on most shared mappings - except for hugetlbfs and anonymous memory.
Linux man page:
"MAP_NORESERVE: Do not reserve swap space for this mapping. When swap
space is reserved, one has the guarantee that it is possible to modify
the mapping. When swap space is not reserved one might get SIGSEGV
upon a write if no physical memory is available. See also the discussion
of the file /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory in proc(5). In kernels before
2.6, this flag had effect only for private writable mappings."
Note that the "guarantee" part is wrong with memory overcommit in Linux.
Also, in Linux hugetlbfs is treated differently - we configure reservation
of huge pages from the pool, not reservation of swap space (huge pages
cannot be swapped).
The rough behavior is [1]:
a) !Hugetlbfs:
1) Without MAP_NORESERVE *or* with memory overcommit under Linux
disabled ("/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory == 2"), the following
accounting/reservation happens:
For a file backed map
SHARED or READ-only - 0 cost (the file is the map not swap)
PRIVATE WRITABLE - size of mapping per instance
For an anonymous or /dev/zero map
SHARED - size of mapping
PRIVATE READ-only - 0 cost (but of little use)
PRIVATE WRITABLE - size of mapping per instance
2) With MAP_NORESERVE, no accounting/reservation happens.
b) Hugetlbfs:
1) Without MAP_NORESERVE, huge pages are reserved.
2) With MAP_NORESERVE, no huge pages are reserved.
Note: With "/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory == 0", we were already able
to configure it for !hugetlbfs globally; this toggle now allows
configuring it more fine-grained, not for the whole system.
The target use case is virtio-mem, which dynamically exposes memory
inside a large, sparse memory area to the VM.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-10-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's introduce RAM_NORESERVE, allowing mmap'ing with MAP_NORESERVE. The
new flag has the following semantics:
"
RAM is mmap-ed with MAP_NORESERVE. When set, reserving swap space (or huge
pages if applicable) is skipped: will bail out if not supported. When not
set, the OS will do the reservation, if supported for the memory type.
"
Allow passing it into:
- memory_region_init_ram_nomigrate()
- memory_region_init_resizeable_ram()
- memory_region_init_ram_from_file()
... and teach qemu_ram_mmap() and qemu_anon_ram_alloc() about the flag.
Bail out if the flag is not supported, which is the case right now for
both, POSIX and win32. We will add Linux support next and allow specifying
RAM_NORESERVE via memory backends.
The target use case is virtio-mem, which dynamically exposes memory
inside a large, sparse memory area to the VM.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-9-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's pass flags instead of bools to prepare for passing other flags and
update the documentation of qemu_ram_mmap(). Introduce new QEMU_MAP_
flags that abstract the mmap() PROT_ and MAP_ flag handling and simplify
it.
We expose only flags that are currently supported by qemu_ram_mmap().
Maybe, we'll see qemu_mmap() in the future as well that can implement these
flags.
Note: We don't use MAP_ flags as some flags (e.g., MAP_SYNC) are only
defined for some systems and we want to always be able to identify
these flags reliably inside qemu_ram_mmap() -- for example, to properly
warn when some future flags are not available or effective on a system.
Also, this way we can simplify PROT_ handling as well.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-8-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's pass ram_flags to qemu_ram_alloc() and qemu_ram_alloc_internal(),
preparing for passing additional flags.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-7-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's pass in ram flags just like we do with qemu_ram_alloc_from_file(),
to clean up and prepare for more flags.
Simplify the documentation of passed ram flags: Looking at our
documentation of RAM_SHARED and RAM_PMEM is sufficient, no need to be
repetitive.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-5-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We want to activate memory within a reserved memory region, to make it
accessible. Let's factor that out.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-4-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We want to reserve a memory region without actually populating memory.
Let's factor that out.
Reviewed-by: Igor Kotrasinski <i.kotrasinsk@partner.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-3-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Let's factor out calculating the size of the guard page and rename the
variable to make it clearer that this pagesize only applies to the
guard page.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> for memory backend and machine core
Cc: Igor Kotrasinski <i.kotrasinsk@partner.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210510114328.21835-2-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
RAM_SHARED now also properly indicates shared anonymous memory. Let's check
that flag for anonymous memory as well, to restore the proper mapping.
Fixes: 06329ccecf ("mem: add share parameter to memory-backend-ram")
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210406080126.24010-4-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We can create shared anonymous memory via
"-object memory-backend-ram,share=on,..."
which is, for example, required by PVRDMA for mremap() to work.
Shared anonymous memory is weird, though. Instead of MADV_DONTNEED, we
have to use MADV_REMOVE: MADV_DONTNEED will only remove / zap all
relevant page table entries of the current process, the backend storage
will not get removed, resulting in no reduced memory consumption and
a repopulation of previous content on next access.
Shared anonymous memory is internally really just shmem, but without a
fd exposed. As we cannot use fallocate() without the fd to discard the
backing storage, MADV_REMOVE gets the same job done without a fd as
documented in "man 2 madvise". Removing backing storage implicitly
invalidates all page table entries with relevant mappings - an additional
MADV_DONTNEED is not required.
Fixes: 06329ccecf ("mem: add share parameter to memory-backend-ram")
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210406080126.24010-3-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEuBi5yt+QicLVzsZrda1lgCoLQhEFAmDIwqsACgkQda1lgCoL
QhGa9QgAg0Ai+7Low6hBXiHdKi0dYzfCAIrtkcDimXNMfdyzjckOy+QANrAvAnbV
PEJbQfzucdGhbEYRwPTzcEFfN853Z9JItXNcAfOaYBnFTmUayj2t1hz2hONfSvQP
6AQzNTfe7lJoroFfft+On5aLg+veZrSp+YudBn3NMM0AnMnwigvzCiSkHCWkplNf
SAZcWOb9e07tiR2ZUq95VII3o6jBSE2MTXO28X6FIYnABcN7Maz6yxIxflfBVwYI
GkeJ4oWsNrVntowKB9gp7DGi0InaO0SMM3OUd4r68n0+pPHMLuE6xMz+nuBazGP+
ekey0YsnJ0mKCwLFNAo38LPzM+Dcdw==
=LEDV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanberger/tags/pull-tpm-2021-06-15-1' into staging
Merge tpm 2021/06/15 v1
# gpg: Signature made Tue 15 Jun 2021 16:09:31 BST
# gpg: using RSA key B818B9CADF9089C2D5CEC66B75AD65802A0B4211
# gpg: Good signature from "Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>" [unknown]
# gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
# gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: B818 B9CA DF90 89C2 D5CE C66B 75AD 6580 2A0B 4211
* remotes/stefanberger/tags/pull-tpm-2021-06-15-1:
tpm: Return QMP error when TPM is disabled in build
sysemu: Make TPM structures inaccessible if CONFIG_TPM is not defined
acpi: Eliminate all TPM related code if CONFIG_TPM is not set
arm: Eliminate all TPM related code if CONFIG_TPM is not set
i386: Eliminate all TPM related code if CONFIG_TPM is not set
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In commit da6d674e50 we split the NVIC code out from the GIC.
This allowed us to specify the NVIC's default value for the num-irq
property (64) in the usual way in its property list, and we deleted
the previous hack where we updated the value in the state struct in
the instance init function. Remove a stale comment about that hack
which we forgot to delete at that time.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210614161243.14211-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add a comment and i2c method that describes the board layout.
Tested: firmware booted to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Kim <brandonkim@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20210608193605.2611114-3-venture@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This fprintf+assert has been in place since the beginning.
It is after to the fp_access_check, so we need to move the
check up. Fold that in to the pairwise filter.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20210604183506.916654-4-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The default of this switch is truly unreachable.
The switch selector is 3 bits, and all 8 cases are present.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20210604183506.916654-3-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This fprintf+assert has been in place since the beginning.
It is prior to the fp_access_check, so we're still good to
raise sigill here.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/381
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20210604183506.916654-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Commit 382c7160d1 ("hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif: Fix EOIR write access
check logic") added an assert_not_reached() if the guest writes the EOIR
register while no interrupt is active.
It turns out some software does this: EDK2, in
GicV3ExitBootServicesEvent(), unconditionally write EOIR for all
interrupts that it manages. This now causes QEMU to abort when running
UEFI on a VM with GICv3. Although it is UNPREDICTABLE behavior and EDK2
does need fixing, the punishment seems a little harsh, especially since
icc_eoir_write() already tolerates writes of nonexistent interrupt
numbers. Display a guest error and tolerate spurious EOIR writes.
Fixes: 382c7160d1 ("hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif: Fix EOIR write access check logic")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210604130352.1887560-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Let's drop the "shared" parameter from ram_block_add() and properly
store it in the flags of the ram block instead, such that
qemu_ram_is_shared() properly succeeds on all ram blocks that were mapped
MAP_SHARED.
We'll use this information next to fix some cases with shared anonymous
memory.
Reviewed-by: Igor Kotrasinski <i.kotrasinsk@partner.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210406080126.24010-2-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
