mirror of
https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git
synced 2024-11-24 12:09:58 +00:00
a38299bf43
Fix COLO-Proxy part of COLO architecture diagram Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
192 lines
9.9 KiB
Plaintext
192 lines
9.9 KiB
Plaintext
COarse-grained LOck-stepping Virtual Machines for Non-stop Service
|
||
----------------------------------------
|
||
Copyright (c) 2016 Intel Corporation
|
||
Copyright (c) 2016 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
|
||
Copyright (c) 2016 Fujitsu, Corp.
|
||
|
||
This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
|
||
See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
|
||
|
||
This document gives an overview of COLO's design and how to use it.
|
||
|
||
== Background ==
|
||
Virtual machine (VM) replication is a well known technique for providing
|
||
application-agnostic software-implemented hardware fault tolerance,
|
||
also known as "non-stop service".
|
||
|
||
COLO (COarse-grained LOck-stepping) is a high availability solution.
|
||
Both primary VM (PVM) and secondary VM (SVM) run in parallel. They receive the
|
||
same request from client, and generate response in parallel too.
|
||
If the response packets from PVM and SVM are identical, they are released
|
||
immediately. Otherwise, a VM checkpoint (on demand) is conducted.
|
||
|
||
== Architecture ==
|
||
|
||
The architecture of COLO is shown in the diagram below.
|
||
It consists of a pair of networked physical nodes:
|
||
The primary node running the PVM, and the secondary node running the SVM
|
||
to maintain a valid replica of the PVM.
|
||
PVM and SVM execute in parallel and generate output of response packets for
|
||
client requests according to the application semantics.
|
||
|
||
The incoming packets from the client or external network are received by the
|
||
primary node, and then forwarded to the secondary node, so that both the PVM
|
||
and the SVM are stimulated with the same requests.
|
||
|
||
COLO receives the outbound packets from both the PVM and SVM and compares them
|
||
before allowing the output to be sent to clients.
|
||
|
||
The SVM is qualified as a valid replica of the PVM, as long as it generates
|
||
identical responses to all client requests. Once the differences in the outputs
|
||
are detected between the PVM and SVM, COLO withholds transmission of the
|
||
outbound packets until it has successfully synchronized the PVM state to the SVM.
|
||
|
||
Primary Node Secondary Node
|
||
+------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------+ +------------+
|
||
| | | HeartBeat +<----->+ HeartBeat | | |
|
||
| Primary VM | +-----------+-----------+ +-----------+------------+ |Secondary VM|
|
||
| | | | | |
|
||
| | +-----------|-----------+ +-----------|------------+ | |
|
||
| | |QEMU +---v----+ | |QEMU +----v---+ | | |
|
||
| | | |Failover| | | |Failover| | | |
|
||
| | | +--------+ | | +--------+ | | |
|
||
| | | +---------------+ | | +---------------+ | | |
|
||
| | | | VM Checkpoint +-------------->+ VM Checkpoint | | | |
|
||
| | | +---------------+ | | +---------------+ | | |
|
||
|Requests<--------------------------\ /-----------------\ /--------------------->Requests|
|
||
| | | ^ ^ | | | | | | |
|
||
|Responses+---------------------\ /-|-|------------\ /-------------------------+Responses|
|
||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
||
| | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | | | +----------+ | | |
|
||
| | | | COLO disk | | | | | | | | | | | | COLO disk| | | |
|
||
| | | | Manager +---------------------------->| Manager | | | |
|
||
| | | ++----------+ v v | | | | | v v | +---------++ | | |
|
||
| | | |+-----------+-+-+-++| | ++-+--+-+---------+ | | | |
|
||
| | | || COLO Proxy || | | COLO Proxy | | | | |
|
||
| | | || (compare packet || | |(adjust sequence | | | | |
|
||
| | | ||and mirror packet)|| | | and ACK) | | | | |
|
||
| | | |+------------+---+-+| | +-----------------+ | | | |
|
||
+------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------+ +------------+
|
||
+------------+ | | | | +------------+
|
||
| VM Monitor | | | | | | VM Monitor |
|
||
+------------+ | | | | +------------+
|
||
+---------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------+
|
||
| Kernel | | | | | Kernel | |
|
||
+---------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------+
|
||
| | | |
|
||
+--------------v+ +---------v---+--+ +------------------+ +v-------------+
|
||
| Storage | |External Network| | External Network | | Storage |
|
||
+---------------+ +----------------+ +------------------+ +--------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
== Components introduction ==
|
||
|
||
You can see there are several components in COLO's diagram of architecture.
|
||
Their functions are described below.
|
||
|
||
HeartBeat:
|
||
Runs on both the primary and secondary nodes, to periodically check platform
|
||
availability. When the primary node suffers a hardware fail-stop failure,
|
||
the heartbeat stops responding, the secondary node will trigger a failover
|
||
as soon as it determines the absence.
|
||
|
||
COLO disk Manager:
|
||
When primary VM writes data into image, the colo disk manger captures this data
|
||
and sends it to secondary VM's which makes sure the context of secondary VM's
|
||
image is consistent with the context of primary VM 's image.
|
||
For more details, please refer to docs/block-replication.txt.
|
||
|
||
Checkpoint/Failover Controller:
|
||
Modifications of save/restore flow to realize continuous migration,
|
||
to make sure the state of VM in Secondary side is always consistent with VM in
|
||
Primary side.
|
||
|
||
COLO Proxy:
|
||
Delivers packets to Primary and Seconday, and then compare the responses from
|
||
both side. Then decide whether to start a checkpoint according to some rules.
|
||
Please refer to docs/colo-proxy.txt for more informations.
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
HeartBeat has not been implemented yet, so you need to trigger failover process
|
||
by using 'x-colo-lost-heartbeat' command.
|
||
|
||
== Test procedure ==
|
||
1. Startup qemu
|
||
Primary:
|
||
# qemu-kvm -enable-kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 -qmp stdio -vnc :7 -name primary \
|
||
-device piix3-usb-uhci \
|
||
-device usb-tablet -netdev tap,id=hn0,vhost=off \
|
||
-device virtio-net-pci,id=net-pci0,netdev=hn0 \
|
||
-drive if=virtio,id=primary-disk0,driver=quorum,read-pattern=fifo,vote-threshold=1,\
|
||
children.0.file.filename=1.raw,\
|
||
children.0.driver=raw -S
|
||
Secondary:
|
||
# qemu-kvm -enable-kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 -qmp stdio -vnc :7 -name secondary \
|
||
-device piix3-usb-uhci \
|
||
-device usb-tablet -netdev tap,id=hn0,vhost=off \
|
||
-device virtio-net-pci,id=net-pci0,netdev=hn0 \
|
||
-drive if=none,id=secondary-disk0,file.filename=1.raw,driver=raw,node-name=node0 \
|
||
-drive if=virtio,id=active-disk0,driver=replication,mode=secondary,\
|
||
file.driver=qcow2,top-id=active-disk0,\
|
||
file.file.filename=/mnt/ramfs/active_disk.img,\
|
||
file.backing.driver=qcow2,\
|
||
file.backing.file.filename=/mnt/ramfs/hidden_disk.img,\
|
||
file.backing.backing=secondary-disk0 \
|
||
-incoming tcp:0:8888
|
||
|
||
2. On Secondary VM's QEMU monitor, issue command
|
||
{'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
|
||
{ 'execute': 'nbd-server-start',
|
||
'arguments': {'addr': {'type': 'inet', 'data': {'host': 'xx.xx.xx.xx', 'port': '8889'} } }
|
||
}
|
||
{'execute': 'nbd-server-add', 'arguments': {'device': 'secondeary-disk0', 'writable': true } }
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
a. The qmp command nbd-server-start and nbd-server-add must be run
|
||
before running the qmp command migrate on primary QEMU
|
||
b. Active disk, hidden disk and nbd target's length should be the
|
||
same.
|
||
c. It is better to put active disk and hidden disk in ramdisk.
|
||
|
||
3. On Primary VM's QEMU monitor, issue command:
|
||
{'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
|
||
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
|
||
'arguments': {'command-line': 'drive_add -n buddy driver=replication,mode=primary,file.driver=nbd,file.host=xx.xx.xx.xx,file.port=8889,file.export=secondary-disk0,node-name=nbd_client0'}}
|
||
{ 'execute':'x-blockdev-change', 'arguments':{'parent': 'primary-disk0', 'node': 'nbd_client0' } }
|
||
{ 'execute': 'migrate-set-capabilities',
|
||
'arguments': {'capabilities': [ {'capability': 'x-colo', 'state': true } ] } }
|
||
{ 'execute': 'migrate', 'arguments': {'uri': 'tcp:xx.xx.xx.xx:8888' } }
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
a. There should be only one NBD Client for each primary disk.
|
||
b. xx.xx.xx.xx is the secondary physical machine's hostname or IP
|
||
c. The qmp command line must be run after running qmp command line in
|
||
secondary qemu.
|
||
|
||
4. After the above steps, you will see, whenever you make changes to PVM, SVM will be synced.
|
||
You can issue command '{ "execute": "migrate-set-parameters" , "arguments":{ "x-checkpoint-delay": 2000 } }'
|
||
to change the checkpoint period time
|
||
|
||
5. Failover test
|
||
You can kill Primary VM and run 'x_colo_lost_heartbeat' in Secondary VM's
|
||
monitor at the same time, then SVM will failover and client will not detect this
|
||
change.
|
||
|
||
Before issuing '{ "execute": "x-colo-lost-heartbeat" }' command, we have to
|
||
issue block related command to stop block replication.
|
||
Primary:
|
||
Remove the nbd child from the quorum:
|
||
{ 'execute': 'x-blockdev-change', 'arguments': {'parent': 'colo-disk0', 'child': 'children.1'}}
|
||
{ 'execute': 'human-monitor-command','arguments': {'command-line': 'drive_del blk-buddy0'}}
|
||
Note: there is no qmp command to remove the blockdev now
|
||
|
||
Secondary:
|
||
The primary host is down, so we should do the following thing:
|
||
{ 'execute': 'nbd-server-stop' }
|
||
|
||
== TODO ==
|
||
1. Support continuous VM replication.
|
||
2. Support shared storage.
|
||
3. Develop the heartbeat part.
|
||
4. Reduce checkpoint VM’s downtime while doing checkpoint.
|