mirror of
https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git
synced 2024-12-11 13:37:05 +00:00
9ee86b8526
Several commits have been changing the generator, but not updating the docs to match: - The implicit tag member is named "type", not "kind". Screwed up in commit39a1815
. - Commit9f08c8ec
made list types lazy, and thereby dropped UserDefOneList if nothing explicitly uses the list type. - Commit51e72bc1
switched the parameter order with 'name' occurring earlier. - Commite65d89bf
changed the layout of UserDefOneList. - Prefer the term 'member' over 'field'. - We now expose visit_type_FOO_members() for objects. - etc. Rework the examples to show slightly more output (we don't want to show too much; that's what the testsuite is for), and regenerate the output to match all recent changes. Also, rearrange output to show .h files before .c (understanding the interface first often makes the implementation easier to follow). Reported-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1457021813-10704-5-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
342 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
342 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
QEMU Machine Protocol Specification
|
|
|
|
0. About This Document
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2009-2016 Red Hat, Inc.
|
|
|
|
This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
|
|
later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
This document specifies the QEMU Machine Protocol (QMP), a JSON-based
|
|
protocol which is available for applications to operate QEMU at the
|
|
machine-level. It is also in use by the QEMU Guest Agent (QGA), which
|
|
is available for host applications to interact with the guest
|
|
operating system.
|
|
|
|
2. Protocol Specification
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
This section details the protocol format. For the purpose of this document
|
|
"Client" is any application which is using QMP to communicate with QEMU and
|
|
"Server" is QEMU itself.
|
|
|
|
JSON data structures, when mentioned in this document, are always in the
|
|
following format:
|
|
|
|
json-DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME
|
|
|
|
Where DATA-STRUCTURE-NAME is any valid JSON data structure, as defined
|
|
by the JSON standard:
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7159.txt
|
|
|
|
The protocol is always encoded in UTF-8 except for synchronization
|
|
bytes (documented below); although thanks to json-string escape
|
|
sequences, the server will reply using only the strict ASCII subset.
|
|
|
|
For convenience, json-object members mentioned in this document will
|
|
be in a certain order. However, in real protocol usage they can be in
|
|
ANY order, thus no particular order should be assumed. On the other
|
|
hand, use of json-array elements presumes that preserving order is
|
|
important unless specifically documented otherwise. Repeating a key
|
|
within a json-object gives unpredictable results.
|
|
|
|
Also for convenience, the server will accept an extension of
|
|
'single-quoted' strings in place of the usual "double-quoted"
|
|
json-string, and both input forms of strings understand an additional
|
|
escape sequence of "\'" for a single quote. The server will only use
|
|
double quoting on output.
|
|
|
|
2.1 General Definitions
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
2.1.1 All interactions transmitted by the Server are json-objects, always
|
|
terminating with CRLF
|
|
|
|
2.1.2 All json-objects members are mandatory when not specified otherwise
|
|
|
|
2.2 Server Greeting
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Right when connected the Server will issue a greeting message, which signals
|
|
that the connection has been successfully established and that the Server is
|
|
ready for capabilities negotiation (for more information refer to section
|
|
'4. Capabilities Negotiation').
|
|
|
|
The greeting message format is:
|
|
|
|
{ "QMP": { "version": json-object, "capabilities": json-array } }
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
- The "version" member contains the Server's version information (the format
|
|
is the same of the query-version command)
|
|
- The "capabilities" member specify the availability of features beyond the
|
|
baseline specification; the order of elements in this array has no
|
|
particular significance, so a client must search the entire array
|
|
when looking for a particular capability
|
|
|
|
2.2.1 Capabilities
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
As of the date this document was last revised, no server or client
|
|
capability strings have been defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 Issuing Commands
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
The format for command execution is:
|
|
|
|
{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value }
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
- The "execute" member identifies the command to be executed by the Server
|
|
- The "arguments" member is used to pass any arguments required for the
|
|
execution of the command, it is optional when no arguments are
|
|
required. Each command documents what contents will be considered
|
|
valid when handling the json-argument
|
|
- The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the
|
|
command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if
|
|
provided. The "id" member can be any json-value, although most
|
|
clients merely use a json-number incremented for each successive
|
|
command
|
|
|
|
2.4 Commands Responses
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result
|
|
of a command execution: success or error.
|
|
|
|
2.4.1 success
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
The format of a success response is:
|
|
|
|
{ "return": json-value, "id": json-value }
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
- The "return" member contains the data returned by the command, which
|
|
is defined on a per-command basis (usually a json-object or
|
|
json-array of json-objects, but sometimes a json-number, json-string,
|
|
or json-array of json-strings); it is an empty json-object if the
|
|
command does not return data
|
|
- The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated
|
|
with the command execution if issued by the Client
|
|
|
|
2.4.2 error
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
The format of an error response is:
|
|
|
|
{ "error": { "class": json-string, "desc": json-string }, "id": json-value }
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
- The "class" member contains the error class name (eg. "GenericError")
|
|
- The "desc" member is a human-readable error message. Clients should
|
|
not attempt to parse this message.
|
|
- The "id" member contains the transaction identification associated with
|
|
the command execution if issued by the Client
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Some errors can occur before the Server is able to read the "id" member,
|
|
in these cases the "id" member will not be part of the error response, even
|
|
if provided by the client.
|
|
|
|
2.5 Asynchronous events
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
As a result of state changes, the Server may send messages unilaterally
|
|
to the Client at any time, when not in the middle of any other
|
|
response. They are called "asynchronous events".
|
|
|
|
The format of asynchronous events is:
|
|
|
|
{ "event": json-string, "data": json-object,
|
|
"timestamp": { "seconds": json-number, "microseconds": json-number } }
|
|
|
|
Where,
|
|
|
|
- The "event" member contains the event's name
|
|
- The "data" member contains event specific data, which is defined in a
|
|
per-event basis, it is optional
|
|
- The "timestamp" member contains the exact time of when the event
|
|
occurred in the Server. It is a fixed json-object with time in
|
|
seconds and microseconds relative to the Unix Epoch (1 Jan 1970); if
|
|
there is a failure to retrieve host time, both members of the
|
|
timestamp will be set to -1.
|
|
|
|
For a listing of supported asynchronous events, please, refer to the
|
|
qmp-events.txt file.
|
|
|
|
Some events are rate-limited to at most one per second. If additional
|
|
"similar" events arrive within one second, all but the last one are
|
|
dropped, and the last one is delayed. "Similar" normally means same
|
|
event type. See qmp-events.txt for details.
|
|
|
|
2.6 QGA Synchronization
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
When using QGA, an additional synchronization feature is built into
|
|
the protocol. If the Client sends a raw 0xFF sentinel byte (not valid
|
|
JSON), then the Server will reset its state and discard all pending
|
|
data prior to the sentinel. Conversely, if the Client makes use of
|
|
the 'guest-sync-delimited' command, the Server will send a raw 0xFF
|
|
sentinel byte prior to its response, to aid the Client in discarding
|
|
any data prior to the sentinel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. QMP Examples
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
This section provides some examples of real QMP usage, in all of them
|
|
"C" stands for "Client" and "S" stands for "Server".
|
|
|
|
3.1 Server greeting
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
S: { "QMP": { "version": { "qemu": { "micro": 50, "minor": 6, "major": 1 },
|
|
"package": ""}, "capabilities": []}}
|
|
|
|
3.2 Client QMP negotiation
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
C: { "execute": "qmp_capabilities" }
|
|
S: { "return": {}}
|
|
|
|
3.3 Simple 'stop' execution
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
C: { "execute": "stop" }
|
|
S: { "return": {} }
|
|
|
|
3.4 KVM information
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
C: { "execute": "query-kvm", "id": "example" }
|
|
S: { "return": { "enabled": true, "present": true }, "id": "example"}
|
|
|
|
3.5 Parsing error
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
C: { "execute": }
|
|
S: { "error": { "class": "GenericError", "desc": "Invalid JSON syntax" } }
|
|
|
|
3.6 Powerdown event
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
S: { "timestamp": { "seconds": 1258551470, "microseconds": 802384 },
|
|
"event": "POWERDOWN" }
|
|
|
|
4. Capabilities Negotiation
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
When a Client successfully establishes a connection, the Server is in
|
|
Capabilities Negotiation mode.
|
|
|
|
In this mode only the qmp_capabilities command is allowed to run, all
|
|
other commands will return the CommandNotFound error. Asynchronous
|
|
messages are not delivered either.
|
|
|
|
Clients should use the qmp_capabilities command to enable capabilities
|
|
advertised in the Server's greeting (section '2.2 Server Greeting') they
|
|
support.
|
|
|
|
When the qmp_capabilities command is issued, and if it does not return an
|
|
error, the Server enters in Command mode where capabilities changes take
|
|
effect, all commands (except qmp_capabilities) are allowed and asynchronous
|
|
messages are delivered.
|
|
|
|
5 Compatibility Considerations
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
All protocol changes or new features which modify the protocol format in an
|
|
incompatible way are disabled by default and will be advertised by the
|
|
capabilities array (section '2.2 Server Greeting'). Thus, Clients can check
|
|
that array and enable the capabilities they support.
|
|
|
|
The QMP Server performs a type check on the arguments to a command. It
|
|
generates an error if a value does not have the expected type for its
|
|
key, or if it does not understand a key that the Client included. The
|
|
strictness of the Server catches wrong assumptions of Clients about
|
|
the Server's schema. Clients can assume that, when such validation
|
|
errors occur, they will be reported before the command generated any
|
|
side effect.
|
|
|
|
However, Clients must not assume any particular:
|
|
|
|
- Length of json-arrays
|
|
- Size of json-objects; in particular, future versions of QEMU may add
|
|
new keys and Clients should be able to ignore them.
|
|
- Order of json-object members or json-array elements
|
|
- Amount of errors generated by a command, that is, new errors can be added
|
|
to any existing command in newer versions of the Server
|
|
|
|
Any command or member name beginning with "x-" is deemed experimental,
|
|
and may be withdrawn or changed in an incompatible manner in a future
|
|
release.
|
|
|
|
Of course, the Server does guarantee to send valid JSON. But apart from
|
|
this, a Client should be "conservative in what they send, and liberal in
|
|
what they accept".
|
|
|
|
6. Downstream extension of QMP
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
We recommend that downstream consumers of QEMU do *not* modify QMP.
|
|
Management tools should be able to support both upstream and downstream
|
|
versions of QMP without special logic, and downstream extensions are
|
|
inherently at odds with that.
|
|
|
|
However, we recognize that it is sometimes impossible for downstreams to
|
|
avoid modifying QMP. Both upstream and downstream need to take care to
|
|
preserve long-term compatibility and interoperability.
|
|
|
|
To help with that, QMP reserves JSON object member names beginning with
|
|
'__' (double underscore) for downstream use ("downstream names"). This
|
|
means upstream will never use any downstream names for its commands,
|
|
arguments, errors, asynchronous events, and so forth.
|
|
|
|
Any new names downstream wishes to add must begin with '__'. To
|
|
ensure compatibility with other downstreams, it is strongly
|
|
recommended that you prefix your downstream names with '__RFQDN_' where
|
|
RFQDN is a valid, reverse fully qualified domain name which you
|
|
control. For example, a qemu-kvm specific monitor command would be:
|
|
|
|
(qemu) __org.linux-kvm_enable_irqchip
|
|
|
|
Downstream must not change the server greeting (section 2.2) other than
|
|
to offer additional capabilities. But see below for why even that is
|
|
discouraged.
|
|
|
|
Section '5 Compatibility Considerations' applies to downstream as well
|
|
as to upstream, obviously. It follows that downstream must behave
|
|
exactly like upstream for any input not containing members with
|
|
downstream names ("downstream members"), except it may add members
|
|
with downstream names to its output.
|
|
|
|
Thus, a client should not be able to distinguish downstream from
|
|
upstream as long as it doesn't send input with downstream members, and
|
|
properly ignores any downstream members in the output it receives.
|
|
|
|
Advice on downstream modifications:
|
|
|
|
1. Introducing new commands is okay. If you want to extend an existing
|
|
command, consider introducing a new one with the new behaviour
|
|
instead.
|
|
|
|
2. Introducing new asynchronous messages is okay. If you want to extend
|
|
an existing message, consider adding a new one instead.
|
|
|
|
3. Introducing new errors for use in new commands is okay. Adding new
|
|
errors to existing commands counts as extension, so 1. applies.
|
|
|
|
4. New capabilities are strongly discouraged. Capabilities are for
|
|
evolving the basic protocol, and multiple diverging basic protocol
|
|
dialects are most undesirable.
|