mirror of
https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git
synced 2024-11-24 12:09:58 +00:00
e6af4f0e94
Add test to show that simple DFS recursion order is not correct for permission update. Correct order is topological-sort order, which will be introduced later. Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific permissions. And, these two children has a common base child, like this: ┌─────┐ ┌──────┐ │ fl2 │ ◀── │ top │ └─────┘ └──────┘ │ │ │ │ w │ ▼ │ ┌──────┐ │ │ fl1 │ │ └──────┘ │ │ │ │ w │ ▼ │ ┌──────┐ └───────▶ │ base │ └──────┘ So, exclusive write is propagated. Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1. So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update. If permission update (remember, it's DFS) goes first through top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren. But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet updated fl1->base child will be in conflict. Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update from <build-directory>/tests. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
acceptance | ||
bench | ||
data | ||
decode | ||
docker | ||
fp | ||
guest-debug | ||
image-fuzzer | ||
include | ||
keys | ||
migration | ||
multiboot | ||
perf/block/qcow2 | ||
plugin | ||
qapi-schema | ||
qemu-iotests | ||
qtest | ||
rocker | ||
tcg | ||
tsan | ||
uefi-test-tools | ||
unit | ||
vm | ||
vmstate-static-checker-data | ||
check-block.sh | ||
dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh | ||
Makefile.include | ||
meson.build | ||
requirements.txt | ||
test-qht-par.c | ||
vhost-user-bridge.c |