If the height is zero, the decompression will probably end up
failing due to not fitting into the allocated buffer later
anyway, so this doesn't need any more elaborate check.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This is similar to the fix in 35cbc98b.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
The init function reads one byte of extradata.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This is required, since invalid parameters actually could
pass the switch check below.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
A change in framesize caused a perpetual loss of synchronization.
So read (and use) the frame size from the frame header instead of
setting it only once.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
This avoids crashes when initializing the range coder for
the first slice context.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This is similar to an existing check for the second-last frame
from 062421e3.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This avoids a potential division by zero.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Also return a proper error code.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Also pass on any returned error code.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Previously the wrong buffer pointer was checked, when buf
instead of *buf was checked. But checking the return value
instead is even better.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
If idx equaled num_coeffs - 1 on entry to the loop, the previous
check failed to break out of the loop.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
The volatile is not required here, and prevents a miscompilation with GCC
4.8.1 when building on x86 with --cpu=i686
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
The sample buffering logic does not take into account that the blocksize
could change. Reset the buffer if the channel configuration changes,
since if there are leftover samples, it is most likely a broken or
misconcatenated stream. This could lead to negative numbers for
missing_samples during decoding.
Thanks to Michael Niedermeyer for pointing these out.
Also don't pointlessly set the buffer size to 1 after copying
one packet.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This makes sure that linesize * start_y doesn't overflow, so that
emulated_edge_mc can get back the original value if needed.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
The code tries to decode a number of channels at the
offset given by the ff_alac_channel_layout_offsets table.
Even if the number of channels decoded so far doesn't
exceed the total number of channels, we need to check that
we actually can decode that number of channels at this offset
as well.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Otherwise buffer size calculations in allocate_buffers could
overflow later, making the code think a large enough buffer
actually was allocated.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
