Summary:
Only implemented by nsWebBrowser, only 2 methods used in TabChild.
Move methods to nsWebBrowser implementation and remove unused methods,
change names to something more obvious, and remove interface.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4WwBrVWQEVy
Test Plan: Try run
Reviewers: nika
Tags: #secure-revision
Bug #: 1480645
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2752
Summary:
We only use one branch of the property set method in
nsIWebBrowserSetup, in one place. Expose this setting in the C++ API
and remove the XPCOM interface.
This patch also exposes the nsWebBrowser.h header to the codebase,
meaning we can possibly start removing some uses of nsIWebBrowser
elsewhere.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G3gnRWJUx6M
Test Plan: Try run
Reviewers: nika
Tags: #secure-revision
Bug #: 1480643
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2736
Summary:
Unused interface that can be removed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GnHRXdtI4qe
Test Plan: Try run
Reviewers: nika
Tags: #secure-revision
Bug #: 1480637
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2694
Summary:
nsIWebShellServices is only implemented by nsDocShell, and only used
in one place in C++. Move definitions to nsIDocShell, and rename
functions to show they are only used as part of Charset changes.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DOSeE3Doc51
Test Plan: Try run
Reviewers: nika
Tags: #secure-revision
Bug #: 1480628
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2692
This fixes the regression of three web-platform-test reftests:
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-002.html
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-011.html
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-012.html
that was caused by patch 1, but it's written on top of the code in
patches 2 and 3 so it's easier to fix afterwards.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2812
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 030c72d1f2945795afe8a81112cd6cb7035d9d6b
This is needed for patch 4.
This is based both on the wording in the spec and the discussion in
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987, and also doesn't
support them for nsMathMLContainerFrame, which is similar to inlines and
ruby.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2815
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b7e23fb248fa34957ca2d539134e872f5a03f5a8
This fixes a rather subtle bug. What the underlying code here is trying
to do is remove nsChangeHint_UpdateContainingBlock when some properties
that influence whether a frame is a containing block for absolutely
positioned or fixed positioned elements have changed, but the final
calculation of being a containing block has not changed. However, the
old code was using a function that tested whether the style could
*possibly* lead to a frame being a containing block. Some of the
properties (like the transform properties) that lead to being a
containing block, for example, don't apply to non-replaced inlines.
Some, however, do (such as 'filter'). So if there's a dynamic change
adding or removing a filter, on an inline that also has an *ignored*
transform property (like 'transform' or 'perspective') set, then the
code prior to this patch causes us to remove the UpdateContainingBlock
hint.
This patch fixes things by testing whether being a containing block
could have changed for *any* type of frame, by separately testing the
changes.
The added tests fail without the patch and pass with the patch, viewed
in isolation. However, without the previous patch, test 003 passes.
Test 003 also fails in Chrome (but 001 and 002 pass).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2814
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0a5dbb15a058cf4a43d989bf53f042c5b718e24d
The basic change here is making nsCSSFrameConstructor::ConstructInline
use the function nsIFrame::IsAbsPosContainingBlock rather than testing
for only one of the conditions in it (being relatively or absolutely
positioned). The rest of the code changes follow from that change.
I tested locally that the added test fails without the patch and passes
with it (either with or without the next patch).
Note that this causes a regression of three web-platform-test reftests:
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-002.html
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-011.html
testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-paint-012.html
which will be fixed in patch 4, since that fix is easier to write after
patch 2.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2813
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0d374628207c234bcd7cf4e320188994fc2680b8
Loading SpecialPowers into frame scripts has side-effects, detailed in part 1,
which are undesirable. The main side-effect that I'm trying to get rid of here
is the force-enabling of permissive COWs in frame script scopes, which is
blocking changes that I need to make elsewhere. But both that and the scope
pollution it causes are likely to allow code to work when running in
automation which fails in real world usage.
This patch changes our special powers frame scripts to load specialpowers.js
and specialpowersAPI.js as JSMs, which run in their own global, but define
most of the same properties on our frame script globals.
Most other callers still load those scripts via <script> tags or the subscript
loader, and should ideally migrated in a follow-up. But even so, this patch
still gives us a cleaner separation of the frame script and non-frame-script
loading code.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CR226gCDaGY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fa253abde2029ec09c724404106d83623f064875
Right now, a lot of test code relies on side-effects of SpecialPowers being
loaded into frame script globals. In particular:
- It forces permissive COWs from those scopes, which allows frame scripts to
pass objects from those scopes to unprivileged content that they otherwise
wouldn't.
- It imports a bunch of helper modules and WebIDL globals which would
otherwise not be available.
Fortunately, this seems to only impact test code at this point. But there's a
real down-the-road risk of it impacting shipping code, which ends up working
in automation due to the side-effects of SpecialPowers, but failing in real
world use.
MozReview-Commit-ID: G27eSSOHymX
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c528dffe3a54eec75ad6cb358980b783b00eb4a4
Summary: When removing frames from the trackbuffer we may remove frames outside the original removal interval as we must remove all frames depending on the removed frames.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2837
PresShell does this already.
I updated the scroll / drag code as well, but I need to admit I didn't figure
out how to write a test for it. The rest of the codepaths are needed for the
added test to pass.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2871
We shouldn't fire mouseenter / leave based on the light tree, but the
flattened tree, the same way as the rest of the hover code works.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2866
parseDeclarations was ignoring html comment tokens, but in fact they
should not be treated any differently from other CSS tokens.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 27Mxt5zbSSJ
--HG--
extra : amend_source : 91e47bbf6951ac9dd4709ac10c49ff51c1781ce8
This alters nsILoadURIDelegate.loadURI() to return a Promise rather than spinning the event loop to synchronously return a boolean, and alters nsDocShell::InternalLoad to allow for those changes by re-calling itself if necessary based on the resolution of the promise.
It turns out that this check is the major bottleneck in this task. Simply
catching the error caused by the duplicate files has the same effect, but is
several orders of magnitude faster.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8vFyQ7VVYRD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 59d724dafd8c9739869a70272e2c9d2778958ffe
Bug 1480624 added new code that results in a warning on MSVC debug builds. This
warning is treated as an error and makes such builds unhappy. The warning is
due to implicit deletion of a dtor, this changeset makes that deletion
explicit to avoid the fatal warning.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2865
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
