This patch applies the same treatment to CSS transitions that we applied to CSS
animations in the previous patch in this series.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 1XNVVYTh0C2
extra : rebase_source : 4e27eaaab5e2b734636fa29406b42ae799e1f493
In order to sort CSS animation objects correctly, we need to know which
element's animation-name property they appear in, if any. Normally that's
simply the target element of the animation's keyframe effect but it can differ
in the following cases:
1) When script modifies a CSSAnimation's effect to target a different element
(or simply removes the effect altogether). In this case we use the
*owning* element to determine the priority of the animation, not the target
element.
This scenario does not yet occur (bug 1049975).
2) When script creates a CSSAnimation object using the CSSAnimation constructor.
In this case, the owning element should be empty (null) and we should
determine the priority of the animation in the same way as any other
Animation object.
Again, this is not yet supported (or even specced) but will be eventually.
3) When script holds a reference to a CSSAnimation object but then updates the
animation-name property such that the animation object is cancelled. In this
case the owning element should be cleared (null) so we know to not to try and
sort this with regard to any animation-name property.
This is possible using code such as the following:
elem.style.animation = 'a 5s';
var a = elem.getAnimations()[0];
elem.style.animation = 'b 5s';
a.play(); // Bring a back to life
document.timeline.getAnimations();
// ^ At this point we need to know how to sort 'a' and 'b' which depends
// on recognizing that a is no longer part of an animation-name list.
Until we implement bug 1049975, we could support sorting animations without
adding the reference to the owning element by setting a flag on the CSSAnimation
object but (having tried this) it turns out to be cleaner to just introduce this
reference now, particularly since we know we will need it later.
Note that we will also need this information in future to dispatch events to the
correct element in circumstances such as (1) once we separate updating timing
information (including events) from applying animation values.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 8o9bf6l7kj7
extra : rebase_source : 391a4e8769cc96584ebd625d4b1d0e873373fd41
Prior to this patch we cancel animations in AnimationCollection::Destroy but
this is not called automatically when the property holding the collection is
destroyed via its destructor. When an element is unbound from the tree we
destroy its animation properties but don't call AnimationCollection::Destroy.
This means, that in such circumstances:
* We won't create animation mutation records for the removed animations
* Once we start registering animations with a timeline they won't have a
chance to remove themselves from the timeline (meaning
document.timeline.getAnimations()) will keep returning them
* Once we go to implement the animationcancel and transitioncancel events we
won't fire them in this case (assuming we implement the queueing/dispatch of
those events as part of the cancel code)
This patch addresses this by moving the call to cancel each animations to the
property destructor for the animation properties.
We do this first so we can land this change separately to ease bisecting any
regressions it might trigger.
--HG--
extra : commitid : KzukSO91RMH
extra : rebase_source : 54ed2aeb69d8bceca424c70c7f33d4bf92d54546
