17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolas Klauser
ed2d3644ab [libc++][NFC] Prefer type aliases over structs
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: sstefan1, libcxx-commits, jeroen.dobbelaere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134901
2022-10-01 22:49:36 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
5146b57b40 [libc++][NFC] Rename the constexpr macros
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.

Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
2022-08-19 15:35:02 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
f4fb72e6d4 [libc++] Use uninitialized algorithms for vector
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: huixie90, eaeltsin, joanahalili, bgraur, alexfh, hans, avogelsgesang, augusto2112, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128146
2022-07-26 17:44:31 +02:00
Hui Xie
0f6364b8a1 [libc++][ranges] implement std::ranges::equal_range
implement `std::ranges::equal_range` which delegates to
`std::equal_range`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129796
2022-07-22 10:24:08 +01:00
Konstantin Varlamov
295b951ebc [lib++][ranges][NFC] Refactor iterator_operations.h to use tags.
Change the mechanism in `iterator_operations.h` to pass around a generic
policy tag indicating whether an internal function is being invoked from
a "classic" STL algorithm or a ranges algorithm. `IterOps` is now
a template class specialized on the policy tag.

The advantage is that this mechanism is more generic and allows defining
arbitrary conditions in a clean manner.

Also add a few more iterator functions to `IterOps`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129390
2022-07-12 17:53:58 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
b48c5010a4 [libc++] Make parameter names consistent and enforce the naming style using readability-identifier-naming
Ensure that parameter names have the style `__lower_case`

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: aheejin, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, miyuki

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129051
2022-07-08 18:17:47 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
988682a389 [libc++] Fix std::lower_bound with C++20-hostile iterators
Reviewed By: EricWF, #libc

Spies: sstefan1, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127577
2022-06-13 12:19:28 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
3cd4531b9b [libc++] Granularize <iterator> includes
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127445
2022-06-10 22:43:57 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
8171586176 [libc++][ranges] Implement ranges::binary_search and ranges::{lower, upper}_bound
Reviewed By: Mordante, var-const, ldionne, #libc

Spies: sstefan1, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121964
2022-06-06 13:33:18 +02:00
Louis Dionne
368faacac7 [libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
2022-03-01 08:20:24 -05:00
Christopher Di Bella
5aaefa510e [libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
2022-02-26 09:00:25 +00:00
Arthur O'Dwyer
fa6b9e4010 [libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
2022-02-04 12:27:19 -05:00
Arthur O'Dwyer
4d81a46f7f [libc++] Alphabetize header #includes. NFCI.
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
2022-01-10 16:30:38 -05:00
Louis Dionne
64184b4af0 [libc++][NFC] Remove useless _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS
Only files that actually use min/max are required to do this dance.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108778
2021-08-27 12:41:55 -04:00
Louis Dionne
134723edd5 [libcxx] Move all algorithms into their own headers
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.

This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb899, which was reverted in 692d7166f771
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583

Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:

Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
2021-06-19 07:49:06 -04:00
Petr Hosek
692d7166f7 Revert "[libcxx][gardening] Move all algorithms into their own headers."
This reverts commit 7ed7d4ccb8991e2b5b95334b508f8cec2faee737 as it
uncovered a Clang bug PR50592.
2021-06-07 17:15:20 -07:00
zoecarver
7ed7d4ccb8 [libcxx][gardening] Move all algorithms into their own headers.
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into its own header. This is a NFC.

Note: during this change, I burned down all the includes, so this follows "include only and exactly what you use."

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
2021-06-04 09:37:12 -07:00