Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
This is in preparation for C++ P0136R1, which switches the model for inheriting
constructors over from synthesizing a constructor to finding base class
constructors (via using shadow decls) when looking for derived class
constructors.
llvm-svn: 269231
Given the following test case:
typedef struct {
const char *name;
id field;
} Test9;
extern void doSomething(Test9 arg);
void test9() {
Test9 foo2 = {0, 0};
doSomething(foo2);
}
With a release compiler, we don't emit any message and silently ignore the
variable "foo2". With an assert compiler, we get an assertion failure.
The root cause —————————————
Back in r140457 we gave InitListChecker a verification-only mode, and will use
CanUseDecl instead of DiagnoseUseOfDecl for verification-only mode.
These two functions handle unavailable issues differently:
In Sema::CanUseDecl, we say the decl is invalid when the Decl is unavailable and
the current context is available.
In Sema::DiagnoseUseOfDecl, we say the decl is usable by ignoring the return
code of DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl
So with an assert build, we will hit an assertion in diagnoseListInit
assert(DiagnoseInitList.HadError() &&
"Inconsistent init list check result.");
The fix -------------------
If we follow what is implemented in CanUseDecl and treat Decls with
unavailable issues as invalid, the variable decl of “foo2” will be marked as
invalid. Since unavailable checking is processed in delayed diagnostics
(r197627), we will silently ignore the diagnostics when we find out that
the variable decl is invalid.
We add a flag "TreatUnavailableAsInvalid" for the verification-only mode.
For overload resolution, we want to say decls with unavailable issues are
invalid; but for everything else, we should say they are valid and
emit diagnostics. Depending on the value of the flag, CanUseDecl
can return different values for unavailable issues.
rdar://23557300
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15314
llvm-svn: 263149
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
is complete (with an error produced if not) and a function that merely queries
whether the type is complete. Either way we'll trigger instantiation if
necessary, but only the former will diagnose and recover from missing module
imports.
The intent of this change is to prevent a class of bugs where code would call
RequireCompleteType(..., 0) and then ignore the result. With modules, we must
check the return value and use it to determine whether the definition of the
type is visible.
This also fixes a debug info quality issue: calls to isCompleteType do not
trigger the emission of debug information for a type in limited-debug-info
mode. This allows us to avoid emitting debug information for type definitions
in more cases where we believe it is safe to do so.
llvm-svn: 256049
for the derived class into it. This is mostly just a cleanup, but could in
principle be a bugfix if there is some codepath that reaches here and didn't
previously require a complete type (I couldn't find any such codepath, though).
llvm-svn: 256037
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20334
Unfortunately, clang currently checks for a certain brokenness of implementations of std::initializer_list in CodeGen (void
AggExprEmitter::VisitCXXStdInitializerListExpr), not in SemaInit. Until that is fixed, make sure we don't let broken attempts that are aggregates leak through into sema, which allows maintenance of expected invariants, and avoids triggering an assertion.
llvm-svn: 254889
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
This fixes a bug where one can take the address of a conditionally
enabled function to drop its enable_if guards. For example:
int foo(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, "")));
int (*p)(int) = &foo;
int result = p(-1); // compilation succeeds; calls foo(-1)
Overloading logic has been updated to reflect this change, as well.
Functions with enable_if attributes that are always true are still
allowed to have their address taken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13607
llvm-svn: 250090
We took both source locations from the end of the initializer list what
the code below doesn't expect. This can lead to a crash when rendering
the diagnostic (PR24816). Assert that we have more than one element in
a scalar initializer with too many elements.
llvm-svn: 248391
While working around a bug in certain standard library implementations,
we would try to diagnose the issue so that library implementors would
fix their code. However, we assumed an entity being initialized was
a non-static data member subobject when other circumstances are
possible.
This fixes PR24526.
llvm-svn: 245675
Without DR1579 implemented, the only case for -Wredundant-move is for a
parameter being returned with the same type as the function return type. Also
include a check to verify that the move constructor will be used by matching
nodes in the AST dump.
llvm-svn: 243594
Dependent types can throw off the analysis for these warnings, possibly giving
conflicting warnings and fix-its. Disabling the warning in template
instantiations will prevent this problem, and will still catch the
non-dependent cases in templates.
llvm-svn: 243538
error.
If the object being moved has a move constructor and a deleted copy constructor,
std::move is required, otherwise Clang will give a deleted constructor error.
llvm-svn: 243463
If we're returning a function parameter, copy elision isn't possible,
so we now warn for redundant move.
PR: 23819
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11305
llvm-svn: 242600
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
The error has the form ... 'int' ... 'const int' ... dropped qualifiers. At
first glance, it appears that the const qualifier is added. Reverse the types
so that the second type is less qualified than the first.
llvm-svn: 237482
-Wpessimizing-move warns when a call to std::move would prevent copy elision
if the argument was not wrapped in a call. This happens when moving a local
variable in a return statement when the variable is the same type as the
return type or using a move to create a new object from a temporary object.
-Wredundant-move warns when an implicit move would already be made, so the
std::move call is not needed, such as when moving a local variable in a return
that is different from the return type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7633
llvm-svn: 236075
We could probably make this work if we cared enough. However, we are
far outside any language rules at this point.
This fixes PR21834.
llvm-svn: 235818
r235046 turned "extern __declspec(selectany) int a;" from a declaration into
a definition to fix PR23242 (required for compatibility with mc.exe output).
However, this broke parsing Windows headers: A d3d11 headers contain something
like
struct SomeStruct {};
extern const __declspec(selectany) SomeStruct some_struct;
This is now a definition, and const objects either need an explicit default
ctor or an initializer so this errors out with
d3d11.h(1065,48) :
error: default initialization of an object of const type
'const CD3D11_DEFAULT' without a user-provided default constructor
(cl.exe just doesn't implement this rule, independent of selectany.)
To work around this, weaken this error into a warning for selectany decls
in microsoft mode, and recover with zero-initialization.
Doing this is a bit hairy since it adds a fixit on an error emitted
by InitializationSequence – this means it needs to build a correct AST, which
in turn means InitializationSequence::Failed() cannot return true when this
fixit is applied. As a workaround, the patch adds a fixit member to
InitializationSequence, and InitializationSequence::Perform() prints the
diagnostic if the fixit member is set right after its call to Diagnose.
That function is usually called when InitializationSequences are used –
InitListChecker::PerformEmptyInit() doesn't call it, but the InitListChecker
case never performs default-initialization, so this is technically OK.
This is the alternative, original fix for PR20208 that got reviewed in the
thread "[patch] Improve diagnostic on default-initializing const variables
(PR20208)". This change basically reverts r213725, adds the original fix for
PR20208, and makes the error a warning in Microsoft mode.
llvm-svn: 235166
Given something like 'int({}, 1)', we would try to emit a diagnostic
regarding the excess element in the scalar initializer. However, we
assumed that the initializer list had an element in it.
llvm-svn: 234565
invalidate lookup_iterators and lookup_results for some name within a
DeclContext if the lookup results for a *different* name change.
llvm-svn: 230121
subobject initialization is not possible, be sure to note the overall
initialization as having failed so that overload resolution knows that the
relevant candidate is not viable.
llvm-svn: 229353
always use the normal copy-initialization rules. Remove a special case that
tries to stay within the list initialization checker here; that makes us do the
wrong thing when list-initialization of an aggregate would not perform
aggregate initialization.
llvm-svn: 228897
based on whether "redundant" braces are ever reasonable as part of the
initialization of the entity, rather than whether the initialization is
"top-level". In passing, add a warning flag for it.
llvm-svn: 228896
