Someday we would like to support HLSL on a wider range of targets, but
today targeting anything other than `dxil` is likly to cause lots of
headaches. This adds an error and tests to validate that the expected
target is `dxil-?-shadermodel`.
We will continue to do a best effort to ensure the code we write makes
it easy to support other targets (like SPIR-V), but this error will
prevent users from hitting frustrating errors for unsupported cases.
Reviewed By: jcranmer-intel, Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132056
Since the patch missed release 15.x and will be included in release 16.x. Also, simplify related tests.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132414
As proposed in D126215 (ffe7950ebc62380c3afc7c71f454a1db3f6f5c76),
I'm dropping the `-analyzer-store` and
`-analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks` clang frontend flags.
I'm also dropping the corresponding commandline handlers of `scanbuild`.
This behavior is planned to be part of `clang-16`.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132289
Move copying compiler arguments to a vector<string> and modifying
common module-related options into CompilerInvocation in preparation for
using some of them in more places and to avoid duplicating this code
accidentally in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132419
In D131869 we noticed that we jump through some hoops because we parse the
tolerance option used in MisExpect.cpp into a 64-bit integer. This is
unnecessary, since the value can only be in the range [0, 100).
This patch changes the underlying type to be 32-bit from where it is
parsed in Clang through to it's use in LLVM.
Reviewed By: jloser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131935
-E option will set entry function for hlsl.
The format is -E entry_name.
To avoid conflict with existing option with name 'E', add an extra prefix '--'.
A new field HLSLEntry is added to TargetOption.
To share code with HLSLShaderAttr, entry function will be add HLSLShaderAttr attribute too.
Reviewed By: beanz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124751
Currently when assertions are enabled, the cc1 flag is not
inserted into the llvmcmd section of object files with embedded
bitcode. This deviates from the normal behavior where this is
the first flag that is inserted. This error stems from incorrect
use of the function generateCC1CommandLine() which requires
manually adding in the -cc1 flag which is currently not done.
Reviewed By: jansvoboda11
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130620
We are supporting quadword lock free atomics on AIX. For the situation that users on AIX are using a libatomic that is lock-based for quadword types, we can't enable quadword lock free atomics by default on AIX in case user's new code and existing code accessing the same shared atomic quadword variable, we can't guarentee atomicity. So we need an option to enable quadword lock free atomics on AIX, thus we can build a quadword lock-free libatomic(also for advanced users considering atomic performance critical) for users to make the transition smooth.
Reviewed By: shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127189
Reverting to simplify some Google-internal rollout issues. Will recommit
in a week or two.
This reverts commit 517bbc64dbe493644eff8d55fd9566435e930520.
Simplify debug info back to just "limited" or "full" by rolling the ctor
type homing fully into the "limited" debug info.
Also fix a bug I found along the way that was causing ctor type homing
to kick in even when something could be vtable homed (where vtable
homing is stronger/more effective than ctor homing) - fixing at the same
time as it keeps the tests (that were testing only "limited non ctor"
homing and now test ctor homing) passing.
It was previously reverted by 8406839d1926486de900c7cabeea9f841bd3edf2.
---
This flag was introduced by
6818991d71
commit 6818991d7165f68fe196922d9e5c6648dd57cc47
Author: Ted Kremenek <kremenek@apple.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 22:06:12 2009 +0000
Add clang-cc option '-analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' to treat
block literals as an entry point for analyzer checks.
The last reference was removed by this commit:
5c32dfc5fb
commit 5c32dfc5fb1cfcff8ae3671284e17daa8da3a188
Author: Anna Zaks <ganna@apple.com>
Date: Fri Dec 21 01:19:15 2012 +0000
[analyzer] Add blocks and ObjC messages to the call graph.
This paves the road for constructing a better function dependency graph.
If we analyze a function before the functions it calls and inlines,
there is more opportunity for optimization.
Note, we add call edges to the called methods that correspond to
function definitions (declarations with bodies).
Consequently, we should remove this dead flag.
However, this arises a couple of burning questions.
- Should the `cc1` frontend still accept this flag - to keep
tools/users passing this flag directly to `cc1` (which is unsupported,
unadvertised) working.
- If we should remain backward compatible, how long?
- How can we get rid of deprecated and obsolete flags at some point?
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
When I read the code I found it easier to reason about if `getUserMode`
is inlined. It might be a personal preference though.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127486
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
This reverts commit d50d9946d1d7e5f20881f0bc71fbd025040b1c96.
Broke check-clang, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
Also revert dependent change "[analyzer] Deprecate the unused 'analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' cc1 flag"
This reverts commit 07b4a6d0461fe64e10d30029ed3d598e49ca3810.
Also revert "[analyzer] Fix buildbots after introducing a new frontend warning"
This reverts commit 90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb.
(See https://reviews.llvm.org/rG90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb)
This flag was introduced by
6818991d71
commit 6818991d7165f68fe196922d9e5c6648dd57cc47
Author: Ted Kremenek <kremenek@apple.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 22:06:12 2009 +0000
Add clang-cc option '-analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' to treat
block literals as an entry point for analyzer checks.
The last reference was removed by this commit:
5c32dfc5fb
commit 5c32dfc5fb1cfcff8ae3671284e17daa8da3a188
Author: Anna Zaks <ganna@apple.com>
Date: Fri Dec 21 01:19:15 2012 +0000
[analyzer] Add blocks and ObjC messages to the call graph.
This paves the road for constructing a better function dependency graph.
If we analyze a function before the functions it calls and inlines,
there is more opportunity for optimization.
Note, we add call edges to the called methods that correspond to
function definitions (declarations with bodies).
Consequently, we should remove this dead flag.
However, this arises a couple of burning questions.
- Should the `cc1` frontend still accept this flag - to keep
tools/users passing this flag directly to `cc1` (which is unsupported,
unadvertised) working.
- If we should remain backward compatible, how long?
- How can we get rid of deprecated and obsolete flags at some point?
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
Vector types in hlsl is using clang ext_vector_type.
Declaration of vector types is in builtin header hlsl.h.
hlsl.h will be included by default for hlsl shader.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125052
This reverts commit e576280380d3f5221cfcc14e9fabeacc8506a43c.
Breaks tests on mac/arm, see comment on https://reviews.llvm.org/D125052
Also revert follow-up "[gn build] Port e576280380d3"
This reverts commit 1e01b1ec72031fcaceb4e77e1c5c8e34f1e862e8.
Vector types in hlsl is using clang ext_vector_type.
Declaration of vector types is in builtin header hlsl.h.
hlsl.h will be included by default for hlsl shader.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125052
Since this didn't make it into the v14 release - anyone requesting the
v14 ABI shouldn't get this GCC-compatible change that isn't backwards
compatible with v14 Clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126334
When Clang generates the path prefix (i.e. the path of the directory
where the file is) when generating FILE, __builtin_FILE(), and
std::source_location, Clang uses the platform-specific path separator
character of the build environment where Clang _itself_ is built. This
leads to inconsistencies in Chrome builds where Clang running on
non-Windows environments uses the forward slash (/) path separator
while Clang running on Windows builds uses the backslash (\) path
separator. To fix this, we add a flag -ffile-reproducible (and its
inverse, -fno-file-reproducible) to have Clang use the target's
platform-specific file separator character.
Additionally, the existing flags -fmacro-prefix-map and
-ffile-prefix-map now both imply -ffile-reproducible. This can be
overriden by setting -fno-file-reproducible.
[0]: https://crbug.com/1310767
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122766
D87451 added -mignore-xcoff-visibility for AIX targets and made it the default (which mimicked the behaviour of the XL 16.1 compiler on AIX).
However, ignoring hidden visibility has unwanted side effects and some libraries depend on visibility to hide non-ABI facing entities from user headers and
reserve the right to change these implementation details based on this (https://libcxx.llvm.org/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.html). This forces us to use
internal linkage fallbacks for these cases on AIX and creates an unwanted divergence in implementations on the plaform.
For these reasons, it's preferable to not add -mignore-xcoff-visibility by default, which is what this patch does.
Reviewed By: DiggerLin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125141
The Itanium C++ ABI says prefixes are substitutable. For most prefixes
we already handle this: the manglePrefix(const DeclContext *, bool) and
manglePrefix(QualType) overloads explicitly handles substitutions or
defer to functions that handle substitutions on their behalf. The
manglePrefix(NestedNameSpecifier *) overload, however, is different and
handles some cases implicitly, but not all. The Identifier case was not
handled; this change adds handling for it, as well as a test case.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122663
When the denormal-fp-math option is used, this should set the
denormal handling mode for all floating point types. However,
currently 32-bit float types can ignore this setting as there is a
variant of the option, denormal-fp-math-f32, specifically for that type
which takes priority when checking the mode based on type and remains
at the default of IEEE. From the description, denormal-fp-math would
be expected to set the mode for floats unless overridden by the f32
variant, and code in the front end only emits the f32 option if it is
different to the general one, so setting just denormal-fp-math should
be valid.
This patch changes the denormal-fp-math option to also set the f32
mode. If denormal-fp-math-f32 is also specified, this is then
overridden as expected, but if it is absent floats will be set to the
mode specified by the former option, rather than remain on the default.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122589
When assertions are enabled, clang will perform RoundTrip for CompilerInvocation argument generation. ibt-seal flags are currently missing in this argument generation, and because of that, the feature doesn't get enabled for these cases. Performing RoundTrip is the default for assert builds, rendering the feature broken in these scenarios.
This patch fixes this and adds a test to properly verify that modules are being generated with the flag when -mibt-seal is used.
Please, add any known relevant reviewer which I may have missed.
[1] - https://reviews.llvm.org/D116070
Reviewed By: pengfei, gftg, aaron.ballman, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118052
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
This removes the -flegacy-pass-manager and
-fno-experimental-new-pass-manager options, and the corresponding
support code in BackendUtil. The -fno-legacy-pass-manager and
-fexperimental-new-pass-manager options are retained as no-ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123609
The function is moved from clangFrontend to clangBasic, which allows tools
(e.g. clang pseudoparser) which don't depend on clangFrontend to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121375
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
This reverts commit 3f0587d0c668202bb89d29a25432aa290e551a31.
Not all tests pass after a few rounds of fixes.
I spot one failure that std::shuffle (potentially different results with
different STL implementations) was misused and replaced it with llvm::shuffle,
but there appears to be another failure in a Windows build.
The latest failure is reported on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3440383
The Randstruct feature is a compile-time hardening technique that
randomizes the field layout for designated structures of a code base.
Admittedly, this is mostly useful for closed-source releases of code,
since the randomization seed would need to be available for public and
open source applications.
Why implement it? This patch set enhances Clang’s feature parity with
that of GCC which already has the Randstruct feature. It's used by the
Linux kernel in certain structures to help thwart attacks that depend on
structure layouts in memory.
This patch set is a from-scratch reimplementation of the Randstruct
feature that was originally ported to GCC. The patches for the GCC
implementation can be found here:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/04/06/14
Link: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-March/061607.html
Co-authored-by: Cole Nixon <nixontcole@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Connor Kuehl <cipkuehl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Foster <jafosterja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Takahashi <jeffrey.takahashi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Cantrell <jordan.cantrell@mail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikk Forbus <nicholas.forbus@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Pugh <nwtpugh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556
The LANGOPT macro allows you to specify a default value for the
langauge option. However, it's expected that these values be constant
rather than depending on other language options (because the
constructor setting the default values does not know the language mode
at the time it's being constructed).
Some of our language options were abusing this and passing in other
language mode options which were then set correctly by other parts of
frontend initialization. This removes the default values for the
language options, and then ensures they're consistently set from the
same place when setting language standard defaults.
compiler is allowed to use optimizations that allow reassociation and
transformations that don’t guaranty accuracy.
For example (x+y)+z is transformed into x+(y+z) . Although
mathematically equivalent, these two expressions may not lead to the
same final result due to errors of summation.
Or x/x is transformed into 1.0 but x could be 0.0, INF or NaN. And so
this transformation also may not lead to the same final result.
Setting the eval method 'ffp-eval-method' or via '#pragma clang fp
eval_method' in this mode, doesn’t have any effect.
This patch adds code to warn the user of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122155
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
