Evaluation odering in function call arguments is implementation-dependent.
In fact, gcc evaluates bottom-top and clang does top-bottom.
Fixes#55283 partially.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D125627
Opaque pointers cannot be polymorphic on the pointed type given their
lack thereof. However they are currently accepted by tablegen but the
intrinsic signature verifier trips when verifying any further
polymorphic type because the opaque pointer codepath for pointers will
not push the pointed type in ArgTys.
This commit adds an assert to easily catch such cases instead of having
the generic signature match failure.
Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125764
Currently several buildbots give unsymbolized traces on crash.
I suspect these are configuring the symbolizer in this way and regressed in
D122251 or thereabouts.
Trying this coupled with a reland of patch that failed on a couple of bots with
no useful stacktrace...
We could do better by inserting a bitcast from scalar int
to vector int or using an insertelement (the alternate test
does not crash because there's an independent fold like that).
But this doesn't seem like a likely pattern, so just bail out
for now.
Fixes issue #55516.
Previously if you read a code/data mask before there was a valid thread
you would get the top byte mask. This meant the value was "valid" as in,
don't read it again.
When using a corefile we ask for the data mask very early on and this
meant that later once you did have a thread it wouldn't read the
register to get the rest of the mask.
This fixes that and adds a corefile test generated from the same program
as in my previous change on this theme.
Depends on D118794
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122411
InstCombine is not required to do anything sensible if it receives
invalid IR.
These tests seem to be testing self-referential instructions that
may occur in unreachable code -- but InstCombine actually goes out
of the way to remove such instructions ahead of time so it doesn't
need to deal with them.
Steve Klabnik recently left the Rust project. Josh Stone (the other member of
the Rust Security Response WG) replaces him as one of the vendor contacts for
Rust.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119137
This brings clang/llvm into line with GCC. The Pass is still enabled for
the affected cores, but is now opt-in when using `-march=`.
I also took the opportunity to add release notes for this change.
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125775
Lowering through libm gives us a baseline version, even though it's not
going to be particularly fast. This is similar to what we do for some
math dialect ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125550
Non-address bits are not part of the virtual address in a pointer.
So they must be removed before passing to interfaces like ptrace.
Some of them we get way with not removing, like AArch64's top byte.
However this is only because of a hardware feature that ignores them.
This change updates all the Process/Target Read/Write memory methods
to remove non-address bits before using addresses.
Doing it in this way keeps lldb-server simple and also fixes the
memory caching when differently tagged pointers for the same location
are read.
Removing the bits is done at the ReadMemory level not DoReadMemory
because particualrly for process, many subclasses override DoReadMemory.
Tests have been added for read/write at the command and API level,
for process and target. This includes variants like
Read<sometype>FromMemory. Commands are tested to make sure we remove
at the command and API level.
"memory find" is not included because:
* There is no API for it.
* It already has its own address handling tests.
Software breakpoints do use these methods but they are not tested
here because there are bigger issues to fix with those. This will
happen in another change.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118794
CodeGen will only produce fixed formwat prologues, but hand-written assembly
can have .cfi directives in any combination they want. This should cause a
fallback to DWARF rather than an assertion failure (or an incorrect compact
unwind if assertions are disabled).
This adds an option to the memory region command
to print all regions at once. Like you can do by
starting at address 0 and repeating the command
manually.
memory region [-a] [<address-expression>]
(lldb) memory region --all
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) ---
[0x0000000000400000-0x0000000000401000) r-x <...>/a.out PT_LOAD[0]
<...>
[0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack]
[0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) ---
The output matches exactly what you'd get from
repeating the command. Including that it shows
unmapped areas between the mapped regions.
(this is why Process GetMemoryRegions is not
used, that skips unmapped areas)
Help text has been updated to show that you can have
an address or --all but not both.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111791
This code is valid for any icmp, so we can safely look through a
freeze when trying to find one.
A caveat here is that replaceFoldableUses() may not end up replacing
any uses in this case. It might make sense to use the freeze as the
context instruction (rather than the terminator) if there is a
freeze, to ensure that it always gets folded. This would require
some changes to how replaceFoldedUses() works though, as it
currently assumes that the value is valid at the end of the block.
Fold immediates regardless of how many uses they have. This is expected
to increase overall code size, but decrease register usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114644
The modified function was incorrectly (not unnecessarily) ignoring grandchild
loops, and this change fixes the bug. In particular, this fixes the handling of
the loop { inner, body }. The TODO in the same function is talking about the b1
self loop, which may be "unnecessarily" lost, but that is a different issue.
It's sufficient to just fold the icmp to true/false here, and then
let constant terminator folding take care of the rest.
It should be noted that while replaceFoldableUses() may not replace
all uses of the icmp, at least the use in the terminator we're
working on is always replaceable, so terminator constant folding
should be reliably enabled as a subsequent step.
Previously SIFoldOperands::foldInstOperand would only fold a
non-inlinable immediate into a single user, so as not to increase code
size by adding the same 32-bit literal operand to many instructions.
This patch removes that restriction, so that a non-inlinable immediate
will be folded into any number of users. The rationale is:
- It reduces the number of registers used for holding constant values,
which might increase occupancy. (On the other hand, many of these
registers are SGPRs which no longer affect occupancy on GFX10+.)
- It reduces ALU stalls between the instruction that loads a constant
into a register, and the instruction that uses it.
- The above benefits are expected to outweigh any increase in code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114643
GetDirtyPageList was being assigned to const & in most places anyway.
If you wanted to change the list you'd make a new one and call
SetDirtyPageList.
GetPageSize is just an int so no issues being const.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125786
This new CTU implementation is the natural extension of the normal single TU
analysis. The approach consists of two analysis phases. During the first phase,
we do a normal single TU analysis. During this phase, if we find a foreign
function (that could be inlined from another TU) then we don’t inline that
immediately, we rather mark that to be analysed later.
When the first phase is finished then we start the second phase, the CTU phase.
In this phase, we continue the analysis from that point (exploded node)
which had been enqueued during the first phase. We gradually extend the
exploded graph of the single TU analysis with the new node that was
created by the inlining of the foreign function.
We count the number of analysis steps of the first phase and we limit the
second (ctu) phase with this number.
This new implementation makes it convenient for the users to run the
single-TU and the CTU analysis in one go, they don't need to run the two
analysis separately. Thus, we name this new implementation as "onego" CTU.
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-much-faster-cross-translation-unit-ctu-analysis-implementation/61728
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123773
x86-target-features.c can spuriously fail when checking for absence of
the string "lvi" in the compiler output due to the temporary path used
for the output file. For example:
"-o" "/tmp/lit-tmp-981j7lvi/x86-target-features-670b86.o"
will make the test fail. This commit checks specifically for lvi as a
target feature, in a similar way to the positive CHECK directive just
above.
Test Plan: fails when using -mlvi-hardening and pass otherwise
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125084
