This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
Summary:
In a decl like `int AA(BB cc)` where BB isn't defined, we end up trying to
parse `BB cc` as an expression (vexing parse) and end up triggering the
parser's "recovery-in-function" completion with no actual function
scope.
This patch avoids the assumption that such a scope exists in this context.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53070
llvm-svn: 344133
Summary:
The initial fix (r337453) had bug and was partially reverted (r338255).
This simplies the original fix by explicitly passing the naming class to the
completion consumer.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52647
llvm-svn: 343575
Summary:
In clangd we had a new type of completion suggestions for cpp
class/struct/unions that will show override signatures for virtual methods in
base classes. This patch implements it in sema because it is hard to deduce more
info about completion token outside of Sema and handle itchy cases.
See the patch D50898 for more info on the functionality.
In addition to above patch this one also converts the suggestion into a
CK_Pattern with whole insertion text as the name of the suggestion and factors
out CodeCompletionString generation for declerations so that it can be re-used
by others.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52225
llvm-svn: 343568
Summary:
The dir component ("somedir" in #include <somedir/fo...>) is considered fixed.
We append "foo" to each directory on the include path, and then list its files.
Completions are of the forms:
#include <somedir/fo^
foo.h>
fox/
The filter is set to the filename part ("fo"), so fuzzy matching can be
applied to the filename only.
No fancy scoring/priorities are set, and no information is added to
CodeCompleteResult to make smart scoring possible. Could be in future.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52076
llvm-svn: 342449
Summary:
Factors out member decleration gathering and uses it in parsing to call signature
help. Doesn't support signature help for base class constructors, the code was too
coupled with diagnostic handling, but still can be factored out but just needs
more afford.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, ioeric
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51917
llvm-svn: 341949
Summary:
Code completion in clang is actually a mix of two features:
- Code completion is a familiar feature. Results are exposed via the
CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessCodeCompleteResults callback.
- Signature help figures out if the current expression is an argument of
some function call and shows corresponding signatures if so.
Results are exposed via CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessOverloadCandidates.
This patch refactors the implementation to untangle those two from each
other and makes some naming tweaks to avoid confusion when reading the
code.
The refactoring is required for signature help fixes, see D51038.
The only intended behavior change is the order of callbacks.
ProcessOverloadCandidates is now called before ProcessCodeCompleteResults.
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51782
llvm-svn: 341660
Summary:
This provides information about the macro definition. For example, it
can be used to compute macro USRs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51675
llvm-svn: 341476
Started crashing in r337453. See the added test case for the crash repro.
The fix reverts part of r337453 that causes the crash and does
not actually break anything when reverted.
llvm-svn: 338255
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.
This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.
As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.
llvm-svn: 338056
Summary:
Currently, protected members from base classes are marked as
inaccessible when completing in derived class. This patch fixes the problem by
setting the naming class correctly when looking up results in base class
according to [11.2.p5].
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49421
llvm-svn: 337453
Having `using qualified::name;` for some symbol is an important signal
for clangd code completion as the user is more likely to use such
symbol. This patch helps to uprank the relevant symbols by saving
UsingShadowDecl in the new field of CodeCompletionResult and checking
whether the corresponding UsingShadowDecl is located in the main file
later in ClangD code completion routine. While the relative importance
of such signal is a subject to change in the future, this patch simply
bumps DeclProximity score to the value of 1.0 which should be enough for
now.
The patch was tested using
`$ ninja check-clang check-clang-tools`
No unexpected failures were noticed after running the relevant testsets.
Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49012
llvm-svn: 336810
Summary:
The method only takes PPreprocessor and don't require structures that
might not be available (e.g. Sema and ASTContext) when CodeCompletionString
needs to be generated for macros.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48973
llvm-svn: 336427
This patch is a preparation for another one containing meaningful
changes. This patch simply removes trailing whitespaces in few files
affected by the upcoming patch and reformats
llvm-svn: 336330
Currently getting such completions requires source correction, reparsing
and calling completion again. And if it shows no results and rollback is
required then it costs one more reparse.
With this change it's possible to get all results which can be later
filtered to split changes which require correction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41537
llvm-svn: 333272
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
Summary:
This would allow code completion clients to know which context is visited during Sema code completion.
Also some changes:
* add `EnteredContext` callback in VisibleDeclConsumer.
* add a simple unittest for sema code completion (only for visited contexts at the moment).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, bkramer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42071
llvm-svn: 322661
Summary:
Enumerating the contents of a namespace or global scope will omit any
decls that aren't already loaded, instead of deserializing them from the
PCH.
This allows a fast hybrid code completion where symbols from headers are
provided by an external index. (Sema already exposes the information
needed to do a reasonabl job of filtering them).
Clangd plans to implement this hybrid.
This option is just a hint - callers still need to postfilter results if
they want to *avoid* completing decls outside the main file.
Reviewers: bkramer, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41989
llvm-svn: 322371
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
Summary:
Adjusted PrintingPolicy inside code completion to avoid printing some
redundant name qualifiers.
Before this change, typedefs that were written unqualified in source
code were printed with qualifiers in completion. For example, in the
following code
struct foo {
typedef int type;
type method();
};
completion item for `method` had return type of `foo::type`, even
though the original code used `type` without qualifiers.
After this change, the completion item has return type `type`, as
originally written in the source code.
Note that this change does not suppress qualifiers written by the
user. For example, in the following code
typedef int type;
struct foo {
typedef int type;
::type method(foo::type);
};
completion item for `method` has return type of `::type` and
parameter type of `foo::type`, as originally written in the source
code.
Reviewers: arphaman, bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38538
llvm-svn: 317677
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33904
Happens when static function is accessed via the class variable. That leads to incorrect overloads number because the variable is considered as the first argument.
struct Bar {
static void foo(); static void foo(int);
};
int main() {
Bar b;
b.foo(/*complete here*/); // did not work before
Bar::foo(/*complete here*/); // worked fine
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36390
llvm-svn: 316646
With enabled CINDEXTEST_CODE_COMPLETE_PATTERNS env option (which enables
IncludeCodePatterns in completion options) code completion after colon
currently suggests access modifiers with 2 completion chunks which is
incorrect.
Example:
class A : <Cursor>B
{
}
Currently we get 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public}{Colon :} (40)'
but the correct line is just 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public} (40)'
The fix introduces more specific scope that occurs between ':' and '{'
It allows us to determine when we don't need to add ':' as a second
chunk to the public/protected/private access modifiers.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38618
llvm-svn: 316436
When selecting constructors for initializing an object of type T from a single
expression of class type U, also consider conversion functions of U that
convert to T (rather than modeling such conversions as calling a conversion
function and then calling a constructor).
This approach is proposed as the resolution for the defect, and is also already
implemented by GCC.
llvm-svn: 314231
Summary:
It will move destructors and operators to the end of completion list.
Destructors and operators are currently very high on the completion
list, as they have the same priority as member functions. However,
they are clearly not something users usually choose in completion
lists.
Reviewers: arphaman, erikjv, bkramer, krasimir
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: eraman, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38081
llvm-svn: 314019
In case of copy constructor is implicitly deleted it's still shown.
PR34402 describes a way to reproduce that.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37435
llvm-svn: 312785
