the following '@'. Conceivably, we could skip tokens until something that
can validly start an @interface declaration here, but it's not clear that
it matters.
llvm-svn: 128325
AttributeLists do not accumulate over the lifetime of parsing, but are
instead reused. Also make the arguments array not require a separate
allocation, and make availability attributes store their stuff in
augmented memory, too.
llvm-svn: 128209
which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example,
void foo()
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6)));
says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in
10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with
the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that
we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete
behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the
function foo() above:
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo"
will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed
attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic)
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo"
will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as
if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it
- If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is
weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak
imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it.
Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a
declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform
matters when checking availability attributes.
The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and
"macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we
have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the
deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open
this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms"
that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang
define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to
shake out more issues with this narrower problem first.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>.
As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and
unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 128127
add support for the OpenCL __private, __local, __constant and
__global address spaces, as well as the __read_only, _read_write and
__write_only image access specifiers. Patch originally by ARM;
language-specific address space support by myself.
llvm-svn: 127915
ActOnFinishFunctionBody/ActOnBlockStmtExpr. This way, we ensure that
we diagnose undefined labels before the jump-scope checker gets run,
since the jump-scope checker requires (as its invariant) that all of
the GotoStmts be wired up correctly.
Fixes PR9495.
llvm-svn: 127738
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
headers, which use C++0x generalized initializer lists. Per PR7069, it
appears that the only use is as the return type of a function, so this
commit enables this extension just in that narrow case. If it's enough
for libstdc++ 4.5, or if it can be trivially extended to work with
libstdc++ 4.5, we'll keep it. Otherwise, or if this breaks anything,
we'll revert and wait for the real feature.
llvm-svn: 127507
to cope with non-type templates by providing appropriate
errors. Previously, we would either assert, crash, or silently build a
dependent type when we shouldn't. Fixes PR9226.
llvm-svn: 127037
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
llvm-svn: 126808
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
The previous name was inaccurate as this token in fact appears at
the end of every preprocessing directive, not just macro definitions.
No functionality change, except for a diagnostic tweak.
llvm-svn: 126631
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
with another component in the nested-name-specifiers, updating its
representation (a NestedNameSpecifier) and source-location information
(currently a SourceRange) simultaneously. This is groundwork for
adding source-location information to nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126346
