Summary:
We always have a dummy target, so any error handling regarding a missing dummy target is dead code now.
Also makes the CommandObject methods that return Target& to express this fact in the API.
This patch just for the CommandObject part of LLDB. I'll migrate the rest of LLDB in a follow-up patch that's WIP.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66737
llvm-svn: 369939
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Reformat OptionEnumValueElement to make it easier to distinguish between
its fields. This also removes the need to disable clang-format for these
arrays.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65489
llvm-svn: 367638
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
In r359354 a GetDebugger() method was added to the CommandObject class,
so that we didn't have to go through the command interpreter to obtain
the script interpreter. This patch simplifies other call sites where
m_interpreter.GetDebugger() was used, and replaces them with a shorter
call to the new method.
llvm-svn: 359373
Inspired by Zachary's mail on lldb-dev, this seemed like low hanging
fruit. This patch breaks the circular dependency between commands and
expression.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59158
llvm-svn: 355762
This patch adds the necessary logic to capture and replay commands
entered into the command interpreter. A DataRecorder shadows the input
and writes its data to a know file. During replay this file is used as
the command interpreter's input.
It's possible to the command interpreter more than once, with a
different input source. We support this scenario by using multiple
buffers. The synchronization for this takes place at the SB layer, where
we create a new recorder every time the debugger input is changed.
During replay we use the corresponding buffer as input.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58564
llvm-svn: 355249
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)
As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.
llvm-svn: 344722
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message. This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.
<rdar://problem/44539514>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309
llvm-svn: 344647
The patch was originally written before we had a CompletionRequest,
so it still used a StringList to pass back the completions to
the request.
llvm-svn: 341124
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.
We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.
The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).
This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.
Reviewers: jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465
llvm-svn: 341086
Summary:
This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function,
making the code simpler and less memory unsafe.
There seems to be a assumption in some command objects that this parameter could be a nullptr,
but from what I can see the rest of the API doesn't actually allow this (and other command
objects and related code pieces dereference this parameter without any checks).
Especially CommandObjectRegexCommand has error handling code for a nullptr that is now gone.
Reviewers: davide, jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49207
llvm-svn: 336955
Summary:
A subset of the LLDB commands follows this command line interface style:
<command name> [arguments] -- <string suffix>
The parsing code for this interface has been so far been duplicated into the different
command objects which makes it hard to maintain and reuse elsewhere.
This patches improves the situation by adding a OptionsWithRaw class that centralizes
the parsing logic and allows easier testing. The different commands now just call this class to
extract the arguments and the raw suffix from the provided user input.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49106
llvm-svn: 336723
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
This allows us to collect useful metrics about lldb debugging sessions.
I thought that an example would be better than a thousand words:
Process 19705 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = step in
frame #0: 0x0000000100000fb4 blah`main at blah.c:3
1 int main(void) {
2 int a = 6;
-> 3 return 0;
4 }
(lldb) statistics enable
(lldb) frame var a
(int) a = 6
(lldb) expr a
(int) $1 = 6
(lldb) statistics disable
(lldb) statistics dump
Number of expr evaluation successes : 1
Number of expr evaluation failures : 0
Number of frame var successes : 1
Number of frame var failures : 0
Future improvements might include:
1. Passing a file, or implementing categories. The way this patch has
been implemented is generic enough to allow this to be extended
easily without breaking the grammar.
2. Adding an SBAPI and Python API for use in scripts.
Thanks to Jim Ingham for discussing the design with me.
<rdar://problem/36555975>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45547
llvm-svn: 330043
Summary:
The idea behind this is to move the functionality which depend on other lldb
classes into a separate class. This way, the Args class can be turned
into a lightweight arc+argv wrapper and moved into the lower lldb
layers.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44306
llvm-svn: 329677
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
This is forcing to use Error::success(), which is in a wide majority
of cases a lot more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26481
llvm-svn: 286561
This change is very mechanical. All it does is change the
signature of `Options::GetDefinitions()` and `OptionGroup::
GetDefinitions()` to return an `ArrayRef<OptionDefinition>`
instead of a `const OptionDefinition *`. In the case of the
former, it deletes the sentinel entry from every table, and
in the case of the latter, it removes the `GetNumDefinitions()`
method from the interface. These are no longer necessary as
`ArrayRef` carries its own length.
In the former case, iteration was done by using a sentinel
entry, so there was no knowledge of length. Because of this
the individual option tables were allowed to be defined below
the corresponding class (after all, only a pointer was needed).
Now, however, the length must be known at compile time to
construct the `ArrayRef`, and as a result it is necessary to
move every option table before its corresponding class. This
results in this CL looking very big, but in terms of substance
there is not much here.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24834
llvm-svn: 282188
This patch also marks the const char* versions as =delete to prevent
their use. This has the potential to cause build breakages on some
platforms which I can't compile. I have tested on Windows, Linux,
and OSX. Best practices for fixing broken callsites are outlined in
Args.h in a comment above the deleted function declarations.
Eventually we can remove these =delete declarations, but for now they
are important to make sure that all implicit conversions from
const char * are manually audited to make sure that they do not invoke a
conversion from nullptr.
llvm-svn: 281919
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
easier to scan a set of options with a relatively large number of positional
arguments. This commit standardizes their formatting throughout LLDB and
applies surrounding directives to exempt them from being formatted by
clang-format.
These kinds of exemptions should be rare cases that benefit significantly
from alternative formatting. They also imply a long-term obligation to
maintain their format since the automated tools will not do so.
llvm-svn: 279882
Options used to store a reference to the CommandInterpreter instance
in the base Options class. This made it impossible to parse options
independent of a CommandInterpreter.
This change removes the reference from the base class. Instead, it
modifies the options-parsing-related methods to take an
ExecutionContext pointer, which the options may inspect if they need
to do so.
Closes https://reviews.llvm.org/D23416
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
llvm-svn: 278440
review it for consistency, accuracy, and clarity. These changes attempt to
address all of the above while keeping the text relatively terse.
<rdar://problem/24868841>
llvm-svn: 275485
This allows expressions such as 'i == 1 || i == 2` to be executed using the IR interpreter, instead of relying on JIT code injection (which may not be available on some platforms).
Patch by cameron314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19124
llvm-svn: 269340
IOHandlerLinesUpdated() does nothing, and IOHandlerIsInputComplete should be
implemented but isn't. This means that multiline expressions don't work. This
patch fixes that. Test case to follow in the next commit.
llvm-svn: 268970
This option evaluates an expression and, if the result is of pointer type, treats it as if it was an array of that many elements and displays such elements
This has a couple subtle points but is mostly as straightforward as it sounds
Add a parray N <expr> alias for this new mode
Also, extend the --object-description mode to do the moral equivalent of the above but display each element in --object-description mode
Add a poarray N <expr> alias for this
llvm-svn: 267372
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.
Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264793
