Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
Summary:
Someone wrote SetEffectiveSetEffectiveGroupID instead of SetEffectiveUserID.
After this fix, the android process list can show user names, e.g.
```
PID PARENT USER GROUP EFF USER EFF GROUP TRIPLE ARGUMENTS
====== ====== ========== ========== ========== ========== ============================== ============================
529 1 root 0 root 0 /sbin/ueventd
```
Reviewers: labath,clayborg,aadsm,xiaobai
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373953
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
There's no need to wrap the just-constructed json::Array in a
json::Value, we can just return that and pass ownership to the
raw_ostream.
llvm-svn: 373656
Although it's called "GetString", StreamString::GetString actually
returns a StringRef. Creating a json object with a StringRef does not
make a copy, which means the StringRef will be dangling as soon as the
underlying stream is destroyed. Add a .str() to force the json object to
hold a copy of the string.
This fixes nearly every test on linux.
llvm-svn: 373572
Summary:
This patch factors out File as an abstract base
class and moves most of its actual functionality into
a subclass called NativeFile. In the next patch,
I'm going to be adding subclasses of File that
don't necessarily have any connection to actual OS files,
so they will not inherit from NativeFile.
This patch was split out as a prerequisite for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68188
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68317
llvm-svn: 373564
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerCommon.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68304
llvm-svn: 373500
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerPlatform.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68302
llvm-svn: 373499
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68301
llvm-svn: 373498
This patch replaces the LLDB's JSON implementation with the one from
LLVM in GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68299
llvm-svn: 373497
This patch replaces the hand-rolled JSON emission in StructuredData with
LLVM's JSON library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248
llvm-svn: 373359
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
Summary:
This patch converts FileSystem::Open from this prototype:
Status
Open(File &File, const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
to this one:
llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<File>>
Open(const FileSpec &file_spec, ...);
This is beneficial on its own, as llvm::Expected is a more modern
and recommended error type than Status. It is also a necessary step
towards https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891, and further developments
for lldb_private::File.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67996
llvm-svn: 373003
lvm_private::File::GetStream() can fail if m_options == 0
It's not clear from the header a File created with a descriptor will be
not be usable by many parts of LLDB unless SetOptions is also called,
but it is.
This is because those parts of LLDB rely on GetStream() to use the
file, and that in turn relies on calling fdopen on the descriptor. When
calling fdopen, GetStream relies on m_options to determine the access
mode. If m_options has never been set, GetStream() will fail.
This patch adds options as a required argument to File::SetDescriptor
and the corresponding constructor.
Patch by: Lawrence D'Anna
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67792
llvm-svn: 372652
Fix processing of "C" packet with signal for the whole process to
default signal value for action list to LLDB_INVALID_SIGNAL_NUMBER
rather than 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67625
llvm-svn: 372090
This moves the dumping logic from the GDBRemoteCommunicationHistory
class into the GDBRemotePacket so that it can be reused from the
reproducer command object.
llvm-svn: 372028
To support dumping the reproducer's GDB remote packets, we need the
(de)serialization logic to live in Utility rather than the GDB remote
plugin. This patch renames StreamGDBRemote to GDBRemote and moves the
relevant packet code there.
Its uses in the GDBRemoteCommunicationHistory and the
GDBRemoteCommunicationReplayServer are updated as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67523
llvm-svn: 371907
Originally the idea was for providers to be defined close to where they
are used. While this helped designing the providers in such a way that
they don't depend on each other, it also means that it's not possible to
access them from a central place. This proved to be a problem for some
providers and resulted in them living in the reproducer class.
The ProcessGDBRemote provider is the last remaining exception. This
patch makes things consistent and moves it into the reproducer like the
other providers.
llvm-svn: 371685
This removes the CleanUp class and replaces its usages with llvm's
ScopeExit, which has similar semantics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67378
llvm-svn: 371474
This is a fix for the issue described in r371144.
> On more than one occasion I've found this test got stuck during replay
> while waiting for a packet from debugserver when the debugger was in
> the process of being destroyed.
When the replay server is out of packets we should just disconnect so
the debugger doesn't have to do any cleanup that it wouldn't do during
capture.
llvm-svn: 371459
plugin.
Unfortunately the test is currently XFAILed because of missing changes
to the clang driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67124
llvm-svn: 370931
My previous attempt in attempt in r369904 actually broke the 32bit build
because File::Read expects to take a reference to size_t. Fix the
warning by using SIZE_MAX to denote failure instead.
llvm-svn: 369910
This patch removes the two variant of StringExtractor::GetStringRef that
return (non-)const references to std::string. The non-const one was
being abused to reinitialize the StringExtractor and its uses are
replaced by calls to the copy asignment operator. The const variant was
refactored to return an actual llvm::StringRef.
llvm-svn: 369493
I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
regex.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392
llvm-svn: 369352
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
This commit contains three small changes to enable lldb-server on Windows.
- Add lldb-server for Windows to the build
- Disable pty redirection on Windows for the initial lldb-server bring up
- Add a support to get the parent pid for a process on Windows
- Ifdef some signals which aren't supported on Windows
Thanks to Hui Huang for the help with this patch!
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, Hui, amccarth, xiaobai, srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61686
llvm-svn: 368774
Summary:
This test doesn't make sense. Change to be consistent with what we did
in GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65965
llvm-svn: 368352
This function is not portable, and there are only a handful of usages of
it anyway. Replacing it with std::this_thread::sleep_for enables us to
get rid of the compatibility code in PosixApi.h.
llvm-svn: 367814
Improved the GDB client base documentation while I was reading through
it. Looks like it got messed up during the automatic comment reflow a
while ago.
llvm-svn: 367481
Summary:
This is a bit more explicit, and makes it possible to build LLDB without
varying the -I lines per-directory.
(The latter is useful because many build systems only allow this to be
configured per-library, and LLDB is insufficiently layered to be split into
multiple libraries on stricter build systems).
(My comment on D65185 has some more context)
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, chandlerc, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65397
Patch by Sam McCall!
llvm-svn: 367241
Right now our Properties.inc only generates the initializer for the
options list but not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the
array definition is identical for all arrays, we might as well also let
the Properties.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
Unfortunately we cannot do the same for enums, as there's this magic
ePropertyExperimental, which needs to come at the end to be interpreted
correctly. Hopefully we can get rid of this in the future and do the
same for the property enums.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65353
llvm-svn: 367238
Property definitions are currently defined in a PropertyDefinition array
and have a corresponding enum to index in this array. Unfortunately this
is quite error prone. Indeed, just today we found an incorrect merge
where a discrepancy between the order of the enum values and their
definition caused the test suite to fail spectacularly.
Tablegen can streamline the process of generating the property
definition table while at the same time guaranteeing that the enums stay
in sync. That's exactly what this patch does. It adds a new tablegen
file for the properties, building on top of the infrastructure that
Raphael added recently for the command options. It also introduces two
new tablegen backends: one for the property definitions and one for
their corresponding enums.
It might be worth mentioning that I generated most of the tablegen
definitions from the existing property definitions, by adding a dump
method to the struct. This seems both more efficient and less error
prone that copying everything over by hand. Only Enum properties needed
manual fixup for the EnumValues and DefaultEnumValue fields.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65185
llvm-svn: 367058
Summary:
Here's a replacement for D62504. I thought I could use LoadModules to implement this but in reality I can't because there are at few issues with it:
* The LoadModules assumes that the list returned by GetLoadedModuleList is comprehensive in the sense that reflects all the mapped segments, however, this is not true, for instance VDSO entry is not there since it's loaded manually by LoadVDSO using GetMemoryRegionInfo and it doesn't represent a specific shared object in disk. Because of this LoadModules will unload the VDSO module.
* The loader (interpreter) module might have also been loaded using GetMemoryRegionInfo, this is true when we launch the process and the rendezvous structure is not yet available (done through LoadInterpreterModule()). The problem here is that this entry will point to the same file name as the one found in /proc/pid/maps, however, when we read the same module from the r_debug.link_map structure it might be under a different name. This is true at least on CentOS where the loader is a symlink. Because of this LoadModules will unload and load the module in a way where the rendezvous breakpoint is unresolved but not resolved again (because we add the new module first and remove the old one after).
The symlink issue might be fixable by first unloading the old and loading the news (but sounds super brittle), however, I'm not sure how to fix the VDSO issue.
Since I can't trust it I'm just going to use GetLoadedModuleList directly with the same logic that we use today for when we read the linked list in lldb. The only safe thing to do here is to only calculate differences between different snapshots of the svr4 packet itself. This will also cut the dependency this plugin has from LoadModules.
I separated the 2 logics into 2 different functions (remote and not remote) because I don't like mixing 2 different logics in the same function with if/else's. Two different functions makes it easier to reason with I believe. However, I did abstract away the logic that decides if we should take a snapshot or add/remove modules so both functions could reuse it.
The other difference between the two is that on the UpdateSOEntriesFromRemote I take the snapshot only once when state = Consistent because I didn't find a good reason to always update that, as we already got the list from state = Add | Remove. I probably should use the same logic on UpdateSOEntries though I don't see a reason not to since it's really using the same data, just read in different places. Any thoughts here?
It might also be worthwhile to add a test to make sure we don't unload modules that were not actually "unloaded" like the vdso. I haven't done this yet though.
This diff is also missing the option for svr4 like proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62503#1564296, I'll start working on this but wanted to have this up first.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil, clayborg, xiaobai
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: srhines, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64013
llvm-svn: 367020
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
