Summary:
The previous attempt at making nameless process not match when searching for a
given name failed because the macos implementation was depending on this detail
in its partial matching strategy. Doing partial matching to avoid expensive
lookups is a perfectly valid thing to do, the way it was implemented seems
somewhat unexpected.
This patch implements it differently by providing special
methods in the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch which match only a subset of fields,
and changes mac host code to use those instead.
Then, it re-applies r373925 to get make the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch with a
name *not* match a nameless process.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, teemperor, jingham
Subscribers: wallace, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68631
llvm-svn: 374529
Since D68289, a couple of tests on linux started being extremely flaky.
All of them were doing name-based attaching and were failing because
they couldn't find an unambiguous process to attach to.
The patch above changed the process finding logic, so that failure to
find a process name does not constitute an error. This meant that a lot
more transient processes showed up in the process list during the test
suite run. Previously, these processes would not appear as they would be
gone by the time we went to read their executable name, arguments, etc.
Now, this alone should not cause an issue were it not for the fact that
we were considering a process with no name as if it matched by default
(even if we were explicitly searching for a process with a specified
name). This meant that any of the "transient" processes with no name
would make the name match ambiguous. That clearly seems like a bug to me
so I fix that.
llvm-svn: 373925
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
