These tests are failing with various assertion failures, but they all
throw the following error message first:
error: a.out 0x0000002d: adding range [0x14-0x24) which has a base that
is less than the function's low PC 0x40060c.
See llvm.org/pr44037.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70381
this reland the commit 4f80fc2491 which
has been reverted at f805c60a09.
Fixed windows buildbot failure (by adding -fno-delayed-template-parsing flag).
Remove the restriction, from the mve tail predication pass, that the
all masked vectors instructions need to be 128-bits. This allows us
to supported extending loads and truncating stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69946
This patch modifies ARMLowOverheadLoops to convert a predicated
vector low-overhead loop into a tail-predicatd one. This is currently
a very basic conversion, with the following restrictions:
- Operates only on single block loops.
- The loop can only contain a single vctp instruction.
- No other instructions can write to the vpr.
- We only allow a subset of the mve instructions in the loop.
TODO: Pass the number of elements, not the number of iterations to
dlstp/wlstp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69945
Up until now, clang interface stubs has replaced the standard
PP -> C -> BE -> ASM -> LNK pipeline. With this change, it will happen in
conjunction with it. So what when you build your code you will get an
a.out or lib.so as well as an interface stub file.
Example:
clang -shared -o libfoo.so -emit-interface-stubs ...
will generate both a libfoo.so and a libfoo.ifso. The .so file will
contain the code from the standard compilation pipeline and the .ifso
file will contain the ELF stub library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70274
This takes a long time and never reduces anything useful for me
(e.g. I've been waiting for 3 hours on a testcase and it hasn't found
any attributes to remove yet). This should probably start by assuming
no attributes matter, and adding back.
This reverts commit 17e37ba57a
because it introduced a circular dependency between Core and Common.
Because d0371f4736 fixed a build issue,
we no longer need that dependency.
We're checking for support but we're discarding the result. My best
guess is that these warnings were disabled in the past. However, I don't
see a reason to keep it that way.
This adds a page about LLDB reproducers. It describes how to use the
reproducers on the command line and lists some of the known
issues/limitations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70409
Summary:
The termination function duplicated the functionality of the
__attribute((destructor))-annotated function __kmp_internal_end_fini,
and we have no indication that this doesn't work.
The function might cause issues with link-time optimization turned on:
until very recently, none of the usual linkers was reporting functions
named in -Wl,-fini as used to the LTO plugin, so it might be dropped.
If the function is dropped, -Wl,-fini=__kmp_internal_end_fini doesn't
do what we want: with ld.bfd and lld it drops the FINI attribute from
.dynamic and with gold we get FINI = 0x0, which leads to a crash on
cleanup. This can be reproduced by building with
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;openmp" \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_LTO=Thin \
-DLLVM_USE_LINKER=gold
The issue in lld has been fixed in f95273f75a, but gold remains without
fix so far.
Fixes PR43927.
Reviewers: JonChesterfield, jdoerfert, AndreyChurbanov
Reviewed By: AndreyChurbanov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69927
Assign artificial locations to calls to special struct-related helper
functions.
Such calls may not inherit a location if emitted within FinishFunction,
at which point the lexical scope stack may be empty, causing CGDebugInfo
to report the current DebugLoc as empty.
Fixes an IR verifier complaint about a call to '__destructor_8_s0' not
having a !dbg location attached.
rdar://57293361
Summary:
For platform that uses macho format, c++filt should be stripping the
leading underscore by default. Introduce the binutil compatible "-n"
option to control strip-undercore behaivor together with the existing
"-_" option and fallback to system default if none of them are set.
rdar://problem/57173514
Reviewers: compnerd, erik.pilkington, dexonsmith, mattd
Reviewed By: compnerd, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70250
Summary: The earlier commit (https://reviews.llvm.org/D70014) missed this one : If Always_Inline happens to be the only entry in FuncFlags, then the assembler will not print it in the summary.
Patch by Bharathi Seshadri <bseshadr@cisco.com>
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70323
SUMMARY:
Adding a test case for read-only data assembly writing for aix
Reviewers: daltenty,Xiangling_Liao
Subscribers: rupprecht, seiyai,hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70182
This patch aims to improve the code generation for float vector gather on POWER9.
Patterns have been implemented to utilize instructions that deliver improved
performance.
Patch by: Kamau Bridgeman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62908
checkTargetFeatures was incorrectly checking for cpu_specific instead of
just 'target'. While this function was never called in that situation,
it seemed correct to fix the condition. Additionally, multiversion
functions can never be always_inline, but if any function accidentially
ended up here we shouldn't diagnose.
Note that the adding of target-features to the list is unnecessary since
the getFunctionFeatureMap actually considers attribute target,
however adding it results in significantly better error messages by
putting the 'target' features first (and thus first to fail).
Otherwise, the error message would be the first feature 'implied' by the
target attribute, and not necessarily the feature listed in the
attribute itself.
This apparently breaks weird use cases where the build directory is on
a separate drive. Someone reported that failure to me privately.
I can't remember of a reason for collating the two arguments in the
first place, so I don't think this should break anything.
Summary:
I saw the doc comment using the Option + Click in Xcode and I was
confused by the fact that tvOS wasn't listed. The method definition
also doesn't make it clear that the check for tvOS is taking place as
the tvOS check is hidden in the isiOS() check.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70364
This patch is from Varun Gandhi <varun_gandhi@apple.com>
