Use a specialized buffer wrapper to limit the number of insertions in the
buffer. After the limit has been reached the buffer only needs to count
the number of insertions to return the buffer size required to store the
entire output.
Depends on D110498
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110499
This optimizes the __format_arg_store type to allow a more efficient
storage of the basic_format_args.
It stores the data in two arrays:
- A struct with the tag of the exposition only variant's type and the
offset of the element in the data array. Since this array only depends
on the type information it's calculated at compile time and can be
shared by different instances of this class.
- The arguments converted to the types used in the exposition only
variant of basic_format_arg. This means the packed data can be
directly copied to an element of this variant.
The new code uses rvalue reference arguments in preparation for P2418.
The handle class also has some changes to prepare for P2418. The real
changed for P2418 will be done separately, but these parts make it
easier to implement that paper.
Some parts of existing test code are removed since they were no longer
valid after the changes, but new tests have been added.
Implements parts of:
- P2418 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
Completes:
- LWG3473 Normative encouragement in non-normative note
Depends on D121138
Reviewed By: #libc, vitaut, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121514
This formatter isn't in the list of required formatters in
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
Since remove_cvref_t<const charT[N]> is charT[N] the formatter is
required by
[format.functions]/25
Preconditions: formatter<remove_cvref_t<Ti>, charT> meets the
BasicFormatter requirements ([formatter.requirements]) for each Ti in
Args.
Depends on D120921
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121138
The concept is based on P2286R2 Formatting Ranges. It will be used to
optimise the storage of __format_arg_store as required by LWG-3473.
Depends on D120916
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120921
As mentionned in D97044, it is fine if users include <atomic> and then
include <stdatomic.h> -- we don't need to error out for that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125579
This simplifies the string structs a bit more and the normal layout should not contain any undefined behaviour anymore. I don't think there is a way to achieve this in the alternate string mode without breaking the ABI.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125496
This patch overhauls how we pick up the ABI library. Instead of setting
ad-hoc flags, it creates interface targets that can be linked against by
the rest of the build, which is easier to follow and extend to support
new ABI libraries.
This is intended to be a NFC change, however there are some additional
simplifications and improvements we can make in the future that would
require a slight behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120727
I guess this is an ABI break for the 32 bit AIX configuration, but I'm
not sure if that one is meant to be ABI stable yet or not.
Previously, this used int32_t for this type on linux, but int64_t
on all other platforms. This was added in D68480 /
54fa9ecd3088508b05b0c5b5cb52da8a3c188655, but I don't really see
any discussion around this detail there.
Switching this to 32 bit on 32 bit AIX silences these libcxx build
warnings:
```
In file included from /scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/libcxx/src/atomic.cpp:12:
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1005:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_add(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:948:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_load(const_cast<__ptr_type>(&__a->__a_value), static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1000:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_add(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1022:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_sub(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
4 warnings generated.
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124519
After feedback from D122861, do the same thing with some of the other headers. Try to move the
headers so they have a similar style and way of doing things.
Reviewed By: ldionne, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124227
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
[libcxx] Reject month 0 in get_date/__get_month
This fixes#47663.
Months in dates should be >= 1 and <= 12.
We parse up to two digits then minus one, because
we want to store this as "months since January"
(0-11).
However we didn't check that the result of that
was not -1. For example if you had (MM/DD/YYYY)
00/21/2022.
Added tests for:
* Failing if month is 0
* Failing if month is 13
* Allowing a leading zero in month e.g. "01"
Note that libc++ and libstdc++ return different
values on parsing failure, and MSVC STL returns
end of stream instead.
Handle the first two by checking for defines, MSVC STL
expects these tests to fail for other reasons already:
https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/main/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt#L372
so not handling that case here.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124175
There are many more instances of this pattern, but I chose to limit this change to .rst files (docs), anything in libcxx/include, and string literals. These have the highest chance of being seen by end users.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante, martong, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124708
Several helper functions specify preconditions as comments, but we never
check them. I ran across a bug report (without a reproducer) in this code,
and I thought that having these assertions in place would make it easier
to troubleshoot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124477
Replace all the instances of `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` with `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` and `_VSTD` with `std`.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124662
- add zip_view and views::zip for C++23
- added unit tests
- implemented section 5.6 (zip) in P2321R2
I used clang-format to format the files but they look nothing like the rest of the code base. Manually indenting each line to match the styles sounds like an impossible task. Is there any clang-format file which can format it reasonable similar to the rest of the code base so that I can manually format the rest lines that look weird?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Spies: Mordante, philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122806
D123182 fixes a bug in Clang's overload resolution. After it landed it
was discovered `basic_format_arg`'s constructors contains this bug. This
fixes the bug in libc++, unblocking D123182.
The code has been tested in combination with D123182.
Reviewed By: royjacobson, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124103
`vector<bool>::const_reference` and `vector<bool>::const_iterator::reference` should be the same type.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123851
This makes the code a bit simpler and (I think) removes the undefined behaviour from the normal string layout.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: labath, dblaikie, JDevlieghere, krytarowski, jgorbe, jingham, saugustine, arichardson, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123580
- added views::join adaptor object
- added test for the adaptor object
- fixed some join_view's tests. e.g iter_swap test
- added some negative tests for join_view to test that operations do not exist when constraints aren't met
- added tests that locks down issues that were already addressed in previous change
- LWG3500 `join_view::iterator::operator->()` is bogus
- LWG3313 `join_view::iterator::operator--` is incorrectly constrained
- LWG3517 `join_view::iterator`'s `iter_swap` is underconstrained
- P2328R1 join_view should join all views of ranges
- fixed some issues in join_view and added tests
- LWG3535 `join_view::iterator::iterator_category` and `::iterator_concept` lie
- LWG3474 Nesting ``join_views`` is broken because of CTAD
- added tests for an LWG issue that isn't resolved in the standard yet, but the previous code has workaround.
- LWG3569 Inner iterator not default_initializable
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Spies: var-const, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123466
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
When we build the library with the stable ABI, we need to include some
functions in the dylib that were made inline in later versions of the
library (to avoid breaking code that might be relying on those symbols).
However, those methods were made non-inline whenever we'd be building
the library, which means that all translation units would end up using
the old out-of-line definition of these methods, as opposed to the new
inlined version. This patch makes it so that only the translation units
that actually define the out-of-line methods use the old definition,
opening up potential optimization opportunities in other translation
units.
This should solve some of the issues encountered in D65667.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123519
The Android platform does not have ndk-version.h, but it will always
have up-to-date libc headers, so it does not need any compatibility
code intended for past versions of NDK_MAJOR. If ndk-version.h is missing,
assume NDK_MAJOR is (conceptually) infinite
Bug: https://buganizer.corp.google.com/issues/222341313
Test: None
