*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
This is a preparatory commit for D22914, where I'd like to replace this mutex by an R/W lock
(which is also not recursive). This required a couple of changes:
- The only caller of Read/WriteRegister, GDBRemoteRegisterContext class, was already acquiring
the mutex, so these functions do not need to. All functions which now do not take a lock, take
an lock argument instead, to remind the caller of this fact.
- GetThreadSuffixSupported() was being called from locked and unlocked contexts (including
contexts where the process was running, and the call would fail if it did not have the result
cached). I have split this into two functions, one which computes the thread suffix support and
caches it (this one always takes the lock), and another, which returns the cached value (and
never needs to take the lock). This feels quite natural as ProcessGdbRemote was already
pre-caching this value at the start.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23802
llvm-svn: 279725
Summary:
The tricky part here was that the exisiting implementation of WriteAllRegisters was expecting
hex-encoded data (as that was what the first implementation I replaced was using, but here we had
binary data to begin with. I thought the read/write register functions would be more useful if
they handled the hex-encoding themselves (all the other client functions provide the responses in
a more-or-less digested form). The read functions return a DataBuffer, so they can allocate as
much memory as they need to, while the write functions functions take an llvm::ArrayRef, as that
can be constructed from pretty much anything.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23659
llvm-svn: 279232
Summary:
Before this, each function had a copy of the code which handled appending of the thread suffix to
the packet (or using $Hg instead). I have moved that code into a single function and made
everyone else use that. The function takes the partial packet as a StreamString rvalue reference,
to avoid a copy and to remind the users that the packet will have undeterminate contents after
the call.
This also fixes the incorrect formatting of the QRestoreRegisterState packet in case thread
suffix is not supported.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23604
llvm-svn: 279040
Apparently clang will happily capture a const variable in a lambda without it being specified in
the capture clause. MSVC does not like that.
llvm-svn: 278925
Summary:
When saving/restoring registers the GDBRemoteRegisterContext class was manually constructing
the register save/restore packets. This creates appropriate helper functions in
GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and switches the class to use those. It also removes what a
duplicate packet send in some of those functions, a thing that I can only attribute to a bad
merge artefact.
I also add a test framework for testing gdb-remote client functionality and add tests for the new
functions I introduced. I'd like to be able to test the register context changes in isolation as
well, but currently there doesn't seem to be a way to reasonably construct a standalone register
context object, so we'll have to rely on the end-to-end tests to verify that.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23553
llvm-svn: 278915
