Summary:
Currently our handling of CUDA architectures is scattered all around
clang. This patch centralizes it.
A key advantage of this centralization is that you can now write a C++
switch on e.g. CudaArch and get a compile error if you don't handle one
of the enum values.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21867
llvm-svn: 274681
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22007
llvm-svn: 274604
- Added new Builtins: enqueue_kernel, get_kernel_work_group_size
and get_kernel_preferred_work_group_size_multiple.
These Builtins use custom check to diagnose parameters of the passed Blocks
i. e. variable number of 'local void*' type params, and check different
overloads specified in Table 6.31 of OpenCL v2.0.
- IR is generated as an internal library call for each OpenCL Builtin,
reusing ObjC Block implementation.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20249
llvm-svn: 274540
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute parallel for simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21977
llvm-svn: 274530
Currently we only have OpenCL 2.0 Builtins i.e. pipes or address space conversions.
They have to be added only in the version 2.0 compilation mode to make the identifiers
available for use in the other versions.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20249
llvm-svn: 274509
member is redundantly redeclared outside the class definition in code built in
c++17 mode, ensure we emit a non-discardable definition of the data member for
c++11 and c++14 compilations to use.
llvm-svn: 274416
This feature needs to be explicitly enabled by overriding shouldTraversePostOrder()
as it has performance drawbacks for the iterative Stmt-traversal.
Patch by Raphael Isemann!
Reviewed by Richard Smith and Benjamin Kramer.
llvm-svn: 274348
This patch adds a __nth_element builtin that allows fetching the n-th type of a
parameter pack with very little compile-time overhead. The patch was inspired by
r252036 and r252115 by David Majnemer, which add a similar __make_integer_seq
builtin for efficiently creating a std::integer_sequence.
Reviewed as D15421. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421
llvm-svn: 274316
Summary: This patch changes the options used by offloading to start with -fopenmp instead of -fomp. This makes the option naming more consistent and materializes a suggestion by Richard Smith in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9888.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: kkwli0, cfe-commits, caomhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21841
llvm-svn: 274283
Summary:
Summary:
Change Clang calling convention SpirKernel to OpenCLKernel.
Set calling convention OpenCLKernel for amdgcn as well.
Add virtual method .getOpenCLKernelCallingConv() to TargetCodeGenInfo
and use it to set target calling convention for AMDGPU and SPIR.
Update tests.
Reviewers: rsmith, tstellarAMD, Anastasia, yaxunl
Subscribers: kzhuravl, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21367
llvm-svn: 274220
No semantic analysis yet.
This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.
We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.
llvm-svn: 274169
Allow -cl-std and other standard -cl- options from cc1 to driver.
Added a test for the options moved.
Patch by Aaron En Ye Shi.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21031
llvm-svn: 274150
constructor would be; this is effectively required by P0136R1. This has the
effect of exposing the validity of the base class initialization steps to
SFINAE checks.
llvm-svn: 274088
When a class property is accessed with an object instance, before this commit,
we try to apply a typo correction of the same property:
property 'c' not found on object of type 'A *'; did you mean 'c'?
With this commit, we correctly emit a diagnostics:
property 'c' is a class property; did you mean to access it with class 'A'?
rdar://26866973
llvm-svn: 274076
We continue accepting "macosx" but canonicalize it to "macos", When emitting
diagnostics, we use "macOS" instead of "OS X".
The PlatformName in TargetInfo is changed from "macosx" to "macos" so we can
directly compare the Platform in AvailabilityAttr with the PlatformName
in TargetInfo.
rdar://26795172
rdar://26800775
llvm-svn: 274064
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
Summary:
Currently output of child process, however in my use case, it
needs to be captured and presented to the user.
Add Redirect method to Compilation and use existing infrastructure
for redirecting output of commands.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21224
llvm-svn: 273997
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273884
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273705
